SmugKitZine Tied for the best movie I have ever seen

ChicRawIdol A brilliant film that helped define a genre

Micah Lloyd Excellent characters with emotional depth. My wife, daughter and granddaughter all enjoyed it...and me, too! Very good movie! You won't be disappointed.

Marva-nova Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.

pmunro-45906 I thought season 1 was ok for a sequel to the movie but I have to say the concept for this Season had me hooked from the first episode. The casting and performances were awesome and was hooked right to the end. Bring on Season 3. Stan you have nothing else to offer!!!

georgetheseale "Wolf Creek 2" is the sequel to the wildly chilling Australian horror film "Wolf Creek" (2005) but was it any good? The answer is yes. It was fantastic. John Jarratt returns as Mick Taylor the "outback legend" and quite frankly ups his game from the first on everything that needed to be upped. With his return becoming gruesomely apparent within the first few minutes, you really know your in for a ride. Car chases, truck chases and horse chases ensue as Mick hunts down the tourist scum polluting his perfect country. Featuring a tension filled "torture scene" that keeps you hanging off the edge of the sofa the whole time and an ending, though not phenomenal or groundbreaking, still leaves Mick more of a mysterious character. Which brings me to my next point, Is Mick the "antagonist" anymore? The movie seemed to push the idea that he was who we were meant to be rooting for, which mind you I don't have a problem with, I just hope Wolf Creek 3 (if we ever get there) will bring the fear back into Mick. This movie is fabulous and I recommend to anyone who enjoyed the first or anyone that enjoys horror movies at all! Score - 9/10

Mr_Ectoplasma "Wolf Creek 2" has outback serial killer Mick Taylor (John Jarratt) at it again, hacking and slashing his way through ignorant tourists and backpackers who stumble into his desolate backyard.I remember seeing "Wolf Creek" right after Christmas 2005 when it was released in the United States. It was truly one of the most gut-churning, oppressive horror films I'd ever seen—it managed to capture the kind of raw grit that made Tobe Hooper's "Texas Chain Saw Massacre" such a terrifying sight to behold. In short, it blew me away.I was hesitant about a sequel to the film, so went into this with low expectations, in spite of it having the film's original writer/director at its helm. "Wolf Creek 2" takes the same formula of the original film, but strips away the frayed edges and instead turns the looney antagonist into a franchise movie villain, akin to Freddy Krueger or Jason Voorhees—which, in my opinion, is a problematic move to make given that the anonymity of the backwoods character is what made the original film so unsettling.That said, "Wolf Creek 2" is a technically well-made film. The cinematography of the the Australian outback is even more lush than in the original film, and it is punctuated with outstandingly graphic and creative murder sequences. There is also a ridiculous and fun underground finale that is reminiscent of "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2." The cast delivers solid performances as well, and Jarratt yokes the looney Mick character to the edges of black comedy. Ultimately, I cannot say that "Wolf Creek 2" is a bad film, because it's not. It is suspenseful, well- shot, and appropriately gruesome. As a hard-edged survival thriller, it hits its marks. But I cannot help but mourn the major tonal shift between it and its predecessor. The original film was truly something special—this sequel, while a solid flick, just doesn't have the same edge—and it seems largely to be the fault of the writers' decision to turn an anonymous backcountry looney into a one- liner slewing, flesh-and-bone Freddy Kreuger figure. 6/10.

Shopaholic35 Not a bad horror movie but there didn't seem to be a point to it. The whole thing was just a cat chasing mouse situation and there was no actual climax. I spent the entire movie waiting for it to start. There were a few scary gross moments but the tension and suspense were missing. It is nothing like the original.I was also disappointed with John Jarrett. He just wasn't as creepy. He was your run of the mill psychopath...nothing special this time around. It was still entertaining but you could certainly give it a miss.WARNING: This movie has way too much animal cruelty. It was lucky that the special effects were super fake but it still made me want to be sick.