NekoHomey Purely Joyful Movie!

Claysaba Excellent, Without a doubt!!

Kailansorac Clever, believable, and super fun to watch. It totally has replay value.

Philippa All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

LouZephyr If you're a fan of the 1st movie, then you have to see this one, since it's the best wishmaster sequel you can get. Andrew Divoff is such a joy to watch, he delivers his lines perfectly and he really lives his role. Sure it has stupid plot holes and it has it's goofy moments, also the effects are not the best, but that doesn't make it a bad movie.I just hate the other "good" main characters, i only got my fun out of watching "the wishmaster" doing his magical wonders and his eloquent speaking.If you like a movie with a charismatic bad guy and if you enjoyed the 1st movie, then i would definitely say "give it a watch!", since it's the last time you see Andrew Divoff performing as the master of wishes.5 Stars -> average horror movie + 1 Star : if you're a fan of the first "Wishmaster" + 1 Star : for Divoff's awesome performancejust skip Wishmaster 3 and 4, even as a fan of the series i wouldn't recommend these.

atinder This is yet another Re-watch, ,I have seen this movie 3 times now, as I saw this before seeing the original.I really loved this movie, I found it to be a lot of fun but not as fun as the Original.This as some really nice gory deaths, which I really liked, effect are so fun to watch and some were just playing weird, even for the Wishmaster series. Andrew Divoff is outstanding playing the Wishmaster, his face just give you the creeps. The lead actress went bit over the top with some of her acting in the , some of cast were really bad in this, the most of them were decent, they could have done better. I loved the last scene in the movie, thought it's was so funny!, I didn't like some of effect near the end, I don't think it fitted well with other gory effect that worked really well with the rest of the movie. Not as good as the first but still a fun to be had in this gory sequel.6 out of 10

SnakesOnAnAfricanPlain Andrew Divoff continues to own, in this samey/samey sequel. It's ridiculous, going for laughs and gore, but never a scare. The moment someone says "I wish my lawyer would go f*%k himself!" You know you're in for a treat. It may not make any sense, but at least it was entertaining in a weird way. The film shouldn't be taken seriously, but it should at least create some rules for its mythology. It seems that the Djinn can now pick and choose which wishes he grants, and manipulates them in ways that don't make sense. There's also too much God talk, from a terrible Paul Johansson. To top it off, our heroine is a murderer. In a film like this, you're not going to be able to connect the audience with a complex character, so why bother?

gavin6942 The Djinn breaks free of his prison inside the Ahura Mazda statue during a burglary resulting in a shoot-out. He confesses to the burglary and murder, despite obviously being innocent. Why? Because inside the prison walls, plenty of men have desires just waiting to be fulfilled...This film picks up exactly where the first left off, with Andrew Divoff reprising his role as the Djinn. The gore effects seem slightly nastier here, at times appearing almost like something from a Cronenberg film.It was written and directed by Jack Sholder, probably best known for directing "A Nightmare on Elm Street 2" in 1985 (14 years prior). I hate to say it, but in many ways this film exceeds Robert Kurtzman's original vision.Of course, some liberties are taken with when the Djinn can use his powers, but I suppose that is not new. And after Andrew Divoff left the series, I don't even know why they kept making sequels.