mesterzakarya
They tried to be fun, but not The film tries to laugh at the viewer, but the scenes are comedy-free The film is successful in ridiculing the superhero movie gaps, but failed to laugh at the viewer with scenes. The rating of this movie is quite appropriate. The short film time is also good and bad It's good to get the viewer far into hollow scenes. It is bad for it to be a kind of low-cost business Nearly 20 minutes from it, it relates to the titles and post scenes.
chris dimarino
Superhero Movie is very odd. Anyone who's seen these Scary Movie spin offs where the movie is a series off topical jokes relating to a movie genre know that they have not been too good lately. This movie surprised me with the fact that I laughed much more than I thought I would. There was a lot of dumb moments that kind of spoil it but I guess it might just be for a different crowd.There are a few well written jokes, and a couple of decent acting jobs. Kevin Hart was funny as always. Leslie Nielsen was a little on the slapstick side but brought his famous personality to it. Sara Paxton almost seemed to pretty and took the movie very seriously. She almost seemed like she was playing an actual part in a hero movie.The real flaws of this movie are when it lulled with sad attempts at jokes and poorly executed goofy moments. Almost every movie in this line has those attempted goofy moments that the self assigned mature audience will dislike, but even some dumb moments made me laugh.I would recommend Superhero Movie to anyone who enjoys comedy and doesn't mind a bunch of moments where the movie lags into dumb comedy.
david-poss
I've got to say that despite what most people reviewed this movie as i found it very entertaining although i can definitely see why this would get low ratings for cheap humor (not that i totally disagree with that) but still despite the cheap humor me and my friend found ourselves laughing very hard at the jokes. If someone asked me to compare this to another comedy i'd compare it to airplane, anyone who has seen airplane can understand this review, its basically very random jokes that are funny but had nothing to do with each other, which brings me to reviewing the plot which without the humor gets like -1 stars but still i give this movie such a high rating mainly because of the way it caused me and my friend to laugh really hard.
elshikh4
Don't get me wrong, this movie is good to some extent, or – fairly – less bad than the recent parodies. I'm just talking about an unmistakable telltale these movies evoke about Hollywood these days.Parody means conscience beside comedy; to observe problems in the art's history (previous movies), or mock at the art itself (the cinema). It assures, more than anything, that cinema has become a living creature in the modern culture, so why not to satirize it, with love.In the last years, the number of parodies got bigger, and the level of making them got awful. So, what's the telltale of that ?! It's not about how for instance the writers and directors have become suddenly stupid! No. It's openly about an industry that lives a crisis; whereas the production has to be speedy and inflate. Hence the artistic level has become something not basic, to keep up with the crazy beat of making many many movies in no time.So, being a movie-maker in Hollywood of today is really shameful. Because it has turned into a city of hastiness, bankruptcy, and endless movies in the same time! Therefore, with great deal of sequels, prequels, spin-offs, remakes, based on already worn-out old works.. etc. the parodies, which are a spoof of all the above, mirror nothing but more bankruptcy. It seems that the deal now is mostly about taking an already made material (not creating original one), doing it very quickly (so farewell to quality too), and – to make it worse and worse – producing big quantity of that every year ! Accordingly (Superhero Movie) is a miniature of a big picture. Being unoriginal, rushed and dirty (as the easiest way to write) all are marks of an ill industry. I believe that in any age the original idea can't disappear, it's the production companies that don't search much, or have a time in the first place; especially while making 400 movies per year in the 2000s vis-à-vis 200 movies per year in the 1980s ! Speaking about the 1980s, look well at the parodies of it, then compare them to the ones of today. Simply the ones of today are far more and less good. For instance, between 1998 and 2008 about 13 parody movies were released by major studios, including nasty flops like the Date, Epic, Disaster, Meet the Spartans series, and some of the Scary Movie series, which makes you long for one Naked Gun movie; at least it was fit for more than one viewing, or a viewing for that matter ! It is, as a whole, a tragedy not of "quantity more than quality", but "quantity beats quality" ! (Superhero Movie) is some witness about how, in the 2000s, the superhero movie has been in fashion as it has never been before. It revenged on one of their worst in my book : Spiderman. It's funny at parts, offensive at many, and fart's lover in between (so while being not as tormenting as its likes lately—it's tormenting anyway !). Yet, its most important witness is the one it didn't intend; about how Super Immature the industry of Hollywood has become ! The parody here is a part of the disease more than a conscience to diagnose it. Obvious disease both ways.
