SincereFinest disgusting, overrated, pointless

Grimossfer Clever and entertaining enough to recommend even to members of the 1%

Aneesa Wardle The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

Nicole I enjoyed watching this film and would recommend other to give it a try , (as I am) but this movie, although enjoyable to watch due to the better than average acting fails to add anything new to its storyline that is all too familiar to these types of movies.

ElMaruecan82 With his bald head, bushy mustache and below average stature, Gérard Jugnot has always been type-casted as the typical French guy, definitely not the leading type by Alain Delon or Lino Ventura's standards.Yet, for an audience avid of characters to mock and/or to identify with, Jugnot's always been one of the most instantly recognizable and popular of all the French actors, thanks or because of the physical qualities I described. To give you a hint, when he shaved his legendary mustache for the first time, it was like a national event in France. In fact, though they played in different registers, Jugnot was the eternal 'average Jean' like Woody Allen the 'neurotic nerd'. And with the same artistic talent, Jugnot was capable to turn what could be seen as a handicap into a true career's asset, when he started directing himself in the early 80's.Jugnot had his breakthrough film as an actor/director by playing "Pinot, simple cop", in the underrated "Wonderful Times", he embraced the economical crisis of the early 90's as Berthier, a guy who lost everything and started living in the streets. And in 2002, he played another memorable anti-heroic role as Edmond Batignole, a Parisian butcher who starts hiding Jewish children and helps them to get to the Swiss border during the Occupation. Although the film can be seen as the typical 'ordinary hero' tale and lesson of courage and integrity, it's not "Life is Beautiful" material and looks more like the kind of TV drama you'd watch on a Thursday night. Strangely enough, the film doesn't have the stylish ambition its story would have called for, a pity considering the potential of the titular character.Batignole's qualities are efficiently highlighted by contrast: he's not as opportunistic as his wife or as zealous as his soon-to-be son-in-law Pierre Jean, a wannabe playwright and notorious collaborator. The film opens in 1942, Batignole, as the brave worker who gets up early finds out that his rabbits were stolen. Convinced that only a child could have entered the warehouse, he questions Dr. Bernstein about his son, keeping him upstairs while Pierre-Jean, smelling the attempt to escape, calls the police, Batignole has some rude words against Dr. Bernstein, not because he's a Jew, but because of his snobbishness. The family ends up being arrested and realizing his participation–Pierre-Jean calls it a deliberate diversion- Batignole understands that his views about class struggles are outdated by a much bigger issue.Yet he acted like a collaborator and thanks to his help, Pierre-Jean pulled some strings to convince Gestapo officers to take Batignole as a caterer. He reluctantly accepts this promotion, he who fought the Germans during the Great War and it's obvious that there is a big part of remorse regarding the Bernstein family. One day though, he finds Simon Bernstein who managed to escape from the Police and an opportunity to redeem himself. He hides Simon and two other girls in his cave, and in the process, kills Pierre-Jean off-screen, when he was about to call the Police. The film's first act is an occasion to remind of the disgrace of the collaboration and humanity of those who jeopardized her lives by protecting Jews.Jean-Paul Rouve is a scene-stealer as the treacherous Pierre-Jean and received a César award for Most Promising Newcomer, the film's only win and nomination. I personally believe that not showing Pierre-Jean's death was a mistake that hurt the film's impact regarding the significance of the character as a first-rate villain and the pivotal role his killing played in Batignole's life. I wonder how the death of Pierre-Jean would have looked on-screen, maybe it wouldn't have worked, but it would have liberated the kind of energy the film mostly lacked. Instead, Jugnot chose the 'easy way', and wasted acting talents for scenes that only consisted on words, while the actions speak much better.The most significant moment is the climactic confrontation with the Vichy Police, the level of tension is perfect when Batignole is asked about Simon, but then, realizing he's not believed, Batignole pretends to be a Jew and starts an inspirational speech accusing the French collaboration. More than a genuine expression of disgust, it sounds like the kind of crowd-pleasing statements intended to raise the eternal 'what would have we done?' question about France's responsibility in the deportation of Jews. Some viewers believe that France resisted and movies like this continue to convey a negative image. Some others believe that such films are essentials, and then some consider that France should approach other historical themes like the unwounded war with Algeria or slavery.I'm sure Jugnot didn't just make another 'Holocaust' film but his climactic speech would have made a more impacting pay-off if the film had featured more intense moments before. Instead, it flirts with many war dramas' archetypes: the good-hearted bishop, the lonely woman who gives her house and body, with such a sort of detachment that I wonder if Jugnot really trusted his material. Jules Sitruk also gives a nice performance as Simon Bernstein, but he never seemed to grasp the gravity of his condition. The film lacked the kind of powerful shocks where Batignole would have slapped him for his own good, would Simon scream or insult him? Maybe, but that's because the kid acted more like HIS generation and his performance needed a 'better' directing. And the two girls didn't have much screen time to grab our interest.The film is a good tribute to anonymous heroes who helped France to keep its honor and only Gérard Jugnot could have pulled such a performance. But it feels like he took the premise of granted and shot the film in a rush, filling it with inspirational speeches yet preventing it for the kind of energy and tension, we expect from a WWII drama.

Claudio Carvalho In 1942, in an occupied Paris, the apolitical grocer Edmond Batignole (Gérard Jugnot) lives with his wife and daughter in a small apartment in the building of his grocery. When his future son-in-law and collaborator of the German Pierre-Jean Lamour (Jean-Paul Rouve) calls the Nazis to arrest the Jewish Bernstein family, they move to the confiscated apartment. Some days later, the young Simon Bernstein (Jules Sitruk) escapes from the Germans and comes to his former home. When Batignole finds him, he feels sorry for the boy and lodges him, hiding Simon from Pierre-Jean and also from his wife. Later, two cousins of Simon meet him in the cellar of the grocery. When Pierre-Jean finds the children, Batignole decides to travel with the children to Switzerland.What a delightful movie this "Monsieur Batignole" is! The story is realistic, balancing dramatic situations with some funny scenes, like, for example, when Batignole is called in the train station to help a German soldier with a twisted knee. Another interesting and quite original aspect is the unusual number of French collaborators, since it is very difficult to see a movie that recognizes that they did exist in times of war. Further, Monsieur Batignole is not the usual hero, but a man driven by the reality to have a heroic action instead. The boy Jules Sitruk steals the movie with his attitudes, and Gérard Jugnot and Jean-Paul Rouve are fantastic. My vote is eight.Title (Brazil): "Herói Por Acaso" ("Hero by Chance")

ernier Although some of the characters are clichés, they are all well acted. The film manages to mix its humor with the seriousness of the subject without the awkwardness and maudlin artificiality of "Life is Beautiful." I don't know if this has been released in the U.S. (I saw it on an Air France flight), but it is worth looking for.

Superwonderscope This movie suffers from terminal cuteness.. Even treating such a horrible subject, Gérard Jugnot does what he's been doing for over 20 years : playing and directing average french citizens facing not so ordinary situations(of unemployment in Une epoque formidable, of the sects in Fallait Pas, of being a father of a famous actress in Meilleur espoir Féminin...etc.,etc.). Treating in a comic way a serious subject.This flick is plain silly...a long road to clichéness with an ability to open doors that have already been opened 50 years ago. The germans are bad, sex-crazed people.Deportation is horrible. Every french citizen was pro-german during the war and pro-De Gaulle in 1945. Daaah? The best part is when he's taking the 3 jewish children nearby the swiss border. The french people living there are supposed to have a strong accent (as the kids). But all the adults don't. It is simply both stupid and hilarious (but unintentionally, of course).Because it wants to tell us about a tragic event and deliver a message of hope we're supposed to love the movie? Nah. It just falls flat on every level : ludicrous dialogues, comedy, drama, war, suspense (ooooohhhh, are the poor children going the get caught by the nasty nazi??? Nah.)...everything is over-demonstrative and SO predictable. This tearjerker is a huge success in France where most of the official critics just love that sense of cuteness. It is beyond redemption, really. This movie deserves a slap in the face to wake it up a bit...but no...terminal cuteness indeed.And not even an accurate use of the Scope A.R to higher the note a bit. Pfff.Superwonderscope says : 1