Linbeymusol Wonderful character development!

Laikals The greatest movie ever made..!

Payno I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

Darin One of the film's great tricks is that, for a time, you think it will go down a rabbit hole of unrealistic glorification.

thinker1691 If one goes to the movies a lot, it is often a bit more interesting when one has read the original work first. Ed McBain was also known as mystery writer Evan Hunter when he wrote the first of many stories surrounding his famous 87th Precinct. The series centered mostly around the reoccurring characters in his Police Station. This compilation series became the basis for the Hollywood movie called " Fuzz. " In the film, Burt Reynolds plays Det. Steve Carella, Jack Weston is Det. Meyer Meyer while Tom Skerritt plays Det. Bert Kling. With the arrival of newcomer Det. Eileen McHenry (Raquel Welch) the precinct sets out to solve a trio of baffling crimes. Formost in their sights is the mad bomber (Yul Brynner) out to extort millions from high city officials by threatening to kill them if they don't pay up. Although there is a serious attempt to convey real police drama concerning juvenile assaults, multiple arson and serial rape, the comic atmosphere and jovial levity, renders all efforts moot. Interestingly, the drama was attempted, but the end result proved more humorous than serious, rendering the movie a silly exercise with no solid resolutions. The surprising appearances of Albert Popwell as Lewis and Yul Brenner as a heavy, meant it was not a total loss. ***

JasparLamarCrabb Not bad. It's fun and features Burt Reynolds and Raquel Welch in their prime...although they share very little screen time together. The plot involves a group of unorthodox Boston policemen (and Welch) trying to nail the "deaf man," who's been setting off bombs around the city. It's not very suspenseful and it's not very imaginatively directed, but the cast keeps its afloat. In addition to Reynolds & Welch, there's the reliable Tom Skerritt, Jack Weston, and Alex Rocco (as an office painting Greek chorus!) --- They're all terrific. The really odd, and most notable thing about FUZZ, is the truly bizarre casting of Yul Brynner as the villain. It's such a small and thankless role, it's a wonder the Oscar winner even took it. He doesn't even have time to strut around with his hands on his hips!

merklekranz I like Burt Reynolds in a comedy such as "The End", and was hoping for something along those lines here. "Fuzz" is not even close, and certainly cannot be considered a comedy. Any effort at humor seems extremely forced, and just plain not funny. A pretty good cast is almost totally wasted, Reynolds and Welch most notably. Tom Skeritt seems simply along for the ride. Too many characters with little or no development, and a plot that stretches credibility to the extreme. I mean, letting anybody near a bomb target's car, nevertheless under the hood, is a real rubber band job. I rate this 1.0 out of ten for all of the above reasons. - MERK

moonspinner55 Burt Reynolds is so laid-back in this picture I thought he might fall over. He, Jack Weston and Tom Skerritt are cops at the Boston Precinct trying to stop a serial killer from blowing up more politicians, Yul Brynner is the bad guy who knows just what clueless cops these guys are, and Raquel Welch is the new badge in the building (the guys humiliate her for awhile, but she's tough and proves her merit). This is a routine cop comedy with dramatic and sometimes violent overtones, not unlike "MASH" (which it attempts to emulate in its cynicism). It was moderately popular in theaters in 1972 mainly because Burt Reynolds had just posed for Cosmo magazine and the ads and the movie one-sheet played that up. I liked Welch's scenes defending herself in the office (where she's been unceremoniously dumped at a desk) and the climactic moments are well done. The end vocal by Dinah Shore is a wonderful bit (Burt was dating her at the time). But that very last shot is perplexing: there's no explanation for it, and I'm sure it left audiences baffled. It's an artistic shot, done with humor, but considering what happens before it, it makes no logical sense. **1/2 from ****