Battle of Los Angeles
Battle of Los Angeles
NR | 12 March 2011 (USA)
Battle of Los Angeles Trailers

In February 1942 Us forces engaged an unidentified flying object above Los Angeles. Now almost 70 years later, the alien invaders have returned.

Reviews
Jeanskynebu the audience applauded
UnowPriceless hyped garbage
SeeQuant Blending excellent reporting and strong storytelling, this is a disturbing film truly stranger than fiction
Guillelmina The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.
adonis98-743-186503 In January 1942 US forces engaged an unidentified flying object above Los Angeles. Now almost 70 years later, the alien invaders have returned. This is a bad rip/off of Independence Day and a bad film in general the lines and the dialogue is awful, the action is awful and i skipped most of this film and once i saw that chick with the Katana cutting in half this air droids or whatever they were i was done i just wasted 3 minutes of my life and i feel really bad about Kel Mitchell he was great in Kenan & Kel but in this movie everyone is just bad, the acting is bad, the action is bad and the special effects are even worse i'm going to give this film an 1/10 just don't watch it for the love of god.
stumpmee77 I saw a movie worse than the original Stargate. So cheap they didn't bother hiring extras to make it appear that it was a MAJOR city under attack. The setting should have been a small town and the aliens should have attacked at night. The ship was cgi, the blowups were cgi they couldn't make tiny cgi people--There were tiny cars. I refer to the opening scene, specifically the alien's opening attack. I was warned then and there but I thought it will get better--No. I saw one dead civilian in a parking lot, a highway, whatever. The arm forces (one couldn't pay me to guess which branch they were) running around, screaming, shooting, running some more, screaming some more. The guy form the 1940's gets big intro and does nothing as far as I watched which was an hour. Ninja gal gets introduced my sense of someone insulting my intelligence raises to levels I can no longer ignore and I went to bed. My thoughts are paralyzed in terms how further I should go describing the badness so I'm going to stop. Sometime in the very near future I'm going to watch Independence Day.
Lech Dharma Because this movie could not hold my full attention, I may have blinked a little too often and missed a few things: like a coherent plot, character development, the reason one of the main characters was dressed the ridiculous way she was (and carries a Japanese sword instead of a gun)etc. It is my impression that the director must have owed some favors (or had a "diversity" agenda), because there was an inordinate percentage of female fighter pilots; and after the first 45 minutes of this movie, NONE of the remaining military characters were white males.This was the first review I've ever written for IMDb; but I felt compelled to warn prospective viewers. The only other feature-length movie I've ever seen that was lamer than this one was "Attack Force" with Steven Seagal.
rollerqueen When this mess started I kept thinking "it'll get going in a minute ." Then half an hour later you think- well,I guess not.The story line seems to be non existent.When the pilot from 1942 appears you are given false hope that this will finally put a few revs in the film, but no.It's a cheap film that looks like it's been made on a back lot of a back lot.Worst film line before we meet the "The Alien " has to be "Anyone got any reeces pieces ? He loves those." Dire dialogue.Terrible script.How on earth did this ever make it to the screen ? worth for the unintentional laughs only ! like the "hard " woman who suddenly appears with one patch over her eye !! where did that come from !! ha ha ha.cheap budget sci-fi at it's worst .