Incannerax What a waste of my time!!!

Nonureva Really Surprised!

ChampDavSlim The acting is good, and the firecracker script has some excellent ideas.

Sameer Callahan It really made me laugh, but for some moments I was tearing up because I could relate so much.

SnoopyStyle It's July 4th in a Colorado small town. Amber Williams (Brooke Nevin), boyfriend Colby Patterson (David Paetkau), Zoe (Torrey DeVitto), Roger, and PJ are friends playing a prank on the local carnival. Roger dresses as the feared Fisherman to spread the legend but PJ dies in an accident. The remaining friends decide to keep the prank a secret. One year later, aspiring photographer Amber returns to town. She receives the feared text message and the mythical Fisherman descend on the group.I thought the Fisherman needed to be near the ocean. Certainly, it would help the motif to be near water. I don't know why the franchise moves to Colorado. The Fisherman becomes a mythical killing machine like Michael Myers or Jason. Jennifer Love Hewitt is nowhere to be found in this straight to DVD sequel. At least, there are some good physical kills. Nevin maintains interest as the lead. The characters don't have enough time to develop chemistry or rooting interest. The franchise is scraping the bottom of the barrel at this point.

megaruda Fast paced movie, the editor knew what he was doing with the awkwardly shot footage he/she received, the concept of the movie could of been one of the biggest surprises in direct to DVD release to the point where it could of become a cult hit, instead whoever wrote the dialogues and whoever directed the movie, definitely ruined it. Illogical reactions from the characters make you feel stupid just for keep watching it, but is a fast movie so you just hold it. There are no good or gory deaths at all maybe except one at the ¨climax¨ of the story, where they reveal way too soon and in the most anti-climatic killer reveal you will ever see that comes in the shape of an on point dialogue with terrible delivery.Then after the surprise is over you are so confused about how a good concept was used in such a dumb way, so the only conclusion you can get to is that it is a dumb movie, cos it is. Also is obviously full of clichés in terms of character archetypes so don't expect the only cool character to outlive it.

FlashCallahan After the accidental death of a friend during a dangerous skateboard stunt, a group of friends decide to cover-up his death and act as if they didn't see anything. However, one year passes and the friends are having their fair share of problems and haven't been together for a while. They are soon bought together when somebody keeps sending lots of intimidating messages, and begins making the teens' lives hell. Soon, the friends find themselves being murdered one-by-one by a mysterious figure in a raincoat and with a large hook as a weapon...I honestly think I'm the only person on the planet who thinks ISKWYDLS is better than the first one. Not due to the writing style or direction, its seeing the annoying Jack Black get offed, and Hewitt spending a lot of time in a bikini, plus it was a whole lot of fun.This threequel is one of those straight to Blu ray jobbies, but its consistent with the franchise, and at the time, we had straight to Blu Ray sequels which were that in name only, see 8mm 2, single white female 2, the net 2.0, all cashing in on a film, but having nothing to do with the original.It's your typical stalk and slash movie, and yes, it's not Ben from the first two, and if you can swallow that, it's fun, exploitative pap, that never outstays its welcome.There are many on here who claim that this is the worst film they have ever seen, obviously they haven't seen many films, because this isn't as bad as I thought, I might enjoy it more due to lowered expectation, but I enjoyed it none the less.

carmmm4 I don't write reviews often, but I feel particularly strongly about this movie.I watched all three of the movies in this semi-trilogy back to back today. The first one was okay, as was the second (which I actually preferred to the first). But I'll Always Know is quite obviously the worst of the three, and I'm basing this purely on the merits of this film. I don't really care that the cast isn't the same, and I wasn't even particularly concerned about the obvious plot difficulties surrounding the catalyst death.This is a direct-to-video movie, but even keeping that in mind, I can't give this movie better than a 3. The first half to 3/4 of the movie isn't terrible--it's about the level of quality you'd expect (low, but watchable). However, the last part of the movie just disintegrates and really makes it obvious that you made a mistake in ever wasting your time with it. I won't give anything away, but a lot of the movie is spent trying to figure out who this film's Fisherman is. Based on what you know about the three films, try to imagine the absolute WORST idea for the identity of the Fisherman. If you decide to watch this movie, that's the ending you're going to get. I guarantee it. If your idea even halfway seems like it would be decent, you haven't come up with the worst idea yet. I strongly recommend turning off the film right before the big reveal.You've been warned.