Tedfoldol everything you have heard about this movie is true.

Kailansorac Clever, believable, and super fun to watch. It totally has replay value.

Payno I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

Edwin The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.

aida091992 1. Not only that suicidal people don't do it in a way that is shown in the movie, but also it looks like she just wanted attention. 2. Basic ignorance of the lesbianism. 3. Very poor character development, and I say it as a psychologist.I accidentally watched it on the TV, what a waste of time. I'm so disappointed.

JelenaG890 Okay, so if you are looking to kill a rainy Saturday inside by watching a movie and this one is on- take my advice and SKIP IT!!!!!!!!! There are some movies which fall into the "so bad they are good" category, like "Showgirls," "Duel in the Sun," etc. "Gigli" is not one such film. It has the reputation of being one of the worst films of all time, and that reputation is well-deserved. Usually, I can sit through a movie at least once even if I hate it. This is one movie that I could not sit through. An afternoon in the dentist's chair is more appealing to me than watching this film, and I am not kidding. The issues with this film are numerous, and have been well-documented. One, is the complete lack of chemistry between the two leads. Considering that they were a mega-couple at the time and inspired one of the most famous couple names of all time, you'd think J-LO and Affleck would actually have chemistry on-screen. Well, you would think so, but you would be very, very wrong. It's been years since Bennifer was a thing, but the two have zero chemistry as a couple on-screen and you have to wonder where their supposed passionate love affair was reflected, because there's no sign of it here. The title is another issue. For years, I thought the name of this was "Giggly." Well, color me surprised when I found out it was not! Live and learn. I'm not sure why exactly two Oscar winning actors like Pacino and Walken are in this film. Did they lose a bet? Did they need money at the time? Did they not read the script before agreeing to be in this? I found myself pondering these questions so much that I could not even focus on the film itself- although judging by what other people have said, I didn't really miss too much. I cannot help but feel sorry for director Martin Brest here. The guy went from directing quality films to directing this mess, and has not directed anything since. He also wrote the film, but creative control was taken away from him here so it was not the film he'd originally envisioned. So I give him a pass there. So, my final advice when it comes to "Gigli": eat glass instead of watching this. It will be less painful.

Floated2 After years have passed since Gigli has been released, and within the constant media and critics hate towards the film. One has decided to settle and watch the film. Gigli was released in 2003 during the peak of Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez's romance career, and many have dismissed the film's failures on them. The film had a massive budget of 54 million yet only made 7 million worldwide. One would consider this as a major reason for the film being as criticized.Gigli has a different sense of what is wants to be. Considered as a romantic crime comedy. The film does bring out several levels of romance in a predictable relationship with the leads. The plot is thin and the film does have several scenes which stretch out, yet could have been edited about 20 minutes shorter. Although even with its flaws, Gigli remains an entertaining watch, due to the fact that there are many unintentional funny and clever scenes. For such a crime gangster film, the ending does have a heart and tender feel about it. Many have dismissed the film as too violent, though there is only one really violent scene, as an unexpected jump scene. Lenghty cameo scenes are made by Christopher Walken and Al Pacino, in which some considered a saving point of the film.

Eka Herlyanti Now I see why this movie is one of those bottom rated movies. But I really can't believe it's one of Martin Brest's works. How come? Did he just get hit by a car or something? Please.... Did you just forget that I really love you Scent Of A Woman movie??? I know you didn't write that movie, but still...There's too much unnecessary dialogues and screens in this movie. It's a comedy, crime and romance. but somehow I couldn't really feel them from the dialogues. They're so lame. Sometimes I feel silence while I was watching this movie.I think Martin is trying to make a movie like Pulp Fiction, which genre is crime and comedy. But come on, it's so far from heaven. I enjoyed Pulp Fiction a lot. But okay, I appreciate Justin Bartha's performance. I think he's the only one who is captivating in this movie. And Al Pacino, too, actually. To me, he's still amazing here.