Dark Victory
Dark Victory
NR | 20 April 1939 (USA)
Dark Victory Trailers

Socialite Judith Traherne lives a lavish but emotionally empty life. Riding horses is one of her few joys, and her stable master is secretly in love with her. Told she has a brain tumor by her doctor, Frederick Steele, Judith becomes distraught. After she decides to have surgery to remove the tumor, Judith realizes she is in love with Dr. Steele, but more troubling medical news may sabotage her new relationship, and her second chance at life.

Reviews
TrueJoshNight Truly Dreadful Film
Ketrivie It isn't all that great, actually. Really cheesy and very predicable of how certain scenes are gonna turn play out. However, I guess that's the charm of it all, because I would consider this one of my guilty pleasures.
Marva-nova Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.
Dana An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.
weezeralfalfa I don't understand the wording of the title. Near the end, Bette says something about they(she and George Brent) had achieved a victory over darkness, presumably meaning despair over her certain impending death from glioblastoma cancer. Before her diagnosis, she had been a carefree, wealthy, heiress, only interested in entertaining herself and friends. After the said successful operation, she returned to her old self for awhile, until she happened upon the folder with details of her case. She was livid at the deceit of her surgeon and lover: Dr. Steele(Brent) and her best friend , Ann King(Geraldine Fitzgerald). After a period of telling sarcasm and extreme hate, she finally realized that they were trying to do her a favor. Bette had her favorite leading man and sometimes lover present in Brent, who costarred with her in eleven films. He had a disquieting way of staring at a person before acting or speaking. Bogie, as her longtime horse trainer, had a very subsidiary role, revealing, during Bette's period of despair, his suppressed love for her. My cousin died of this incurable cancer not long ago. He was lucky he experienced minimal symptoms before succumbing. Even for those who experience some of the symptoms, it's a relatively brief and painless cancer, and some remarked that they might wish to die of this disease.
vincentlynch-moonoi In terms of best male actor of all time, for me it's a tie between Spencer Tracy and Cary Grant. For best female actor, no question in my mind -- Bette Davis. And her talents are well displayed in this, which was said to be her favorite film.I want to start out by saying that if you already have the DVD, I don't recommend updating to the Blu Ray version. I'm not sure there's significant improvement.This film is another of the famous pairings of Bette Davis and George Brent. I actually think this is one of the better ones because there's more of a story to Brent's character here than sometimes occurred. He's a doctor with some expertise in brain problems, who is about to go off on medical research. He is persuaded to postpone his trip to look after Bette Davis' spoiled rich girl character, who is having symptoms of dizziness, headaches, and double vision. Early in the film it's almost impossible to have much sympathy for her character. But, we also know that some of her impertinent behavior is a result of her fear. My sympathy for the character began when she received the diagnosis -- I've been there, done that, although in my case both times it was good news...which was not expected. But the fear was immense while waiting for the prognosis.There are several supporting actors worth mentioning. Geraldine Fitzgerald is very good as the best friend. Humphrey Bogart has an odd role as a stable man with an Irish accent. The role is often criticized, but this was back when he was still a supporting actor; he was paying his dues to the studio here. Ronald Reagan has a nothing role as a slightly tipsy friend; I can't believe it helped his career. Henry Travers is good (as always) as the country doctor who persuades George Brent to take Davis' case.A major portion of the film is the love conquers all stuff...although, of course, in this case it doesn't. But it is a good example of how people can sometimes fool themselves about the future.The death scene in remarkably well done from an emotional standpoint. In my view, one of the great moments in film.The one part of the film that just doesn't work for me is Humphrey Bogart's main scene. To me it just doesn't work. Not because of the character's Irish accent, but just because it seems inane. I think the problem with the scene is that the groundwork of it is not laid, and then Bogart tries to seduce Davis, not knowing that she is dying. I think it's the one significant flaw in the film. Well, other than Ronald Reagan's empty performance.One of the bonuses on the Blu Ray edition is a short documentary sort of lamenting that this film, or Bette's performance did not win the Academy Award. However, the year was 1939, the year often considered the year that the finest films in Hollywood's history were made, including "Gone With The Wind". "Dark Victory" is a wonderful film and Bette Davis' performance is memorable. But neither the film nor the performance could complete with "GWTW" or "The Wizard Of Oz", or several others.Even despite the fact that Davis is my favorite actress, this film was very memorable to me. When I decided to upgrade to Blu Ray (a waste), I delayed ordering this film because I was expecting a bad diagnosis, It was only after the green light that I had the nerve to order the film. The death scene is that memorable.
jeffhaller125 I hated this movie as a kid and decided to see what I would think 40 years later. There is no doubt that it is well-made: well directed, well written and except for Davis and Brent (did he ever act, it was always the same performance)well acted. All the Davis mannerisms are there and it is amazing how unattractive she really was which doesn't work well forthis character. Judith Traherne is abrasive and crude. Davis could give her some sympathy if she would just shut up, slow down and listen for a second instead of divaing it up every chance she gets. I laughed when they went into the explanation of how this contrived disease would progress. But the noble thing about the actors is that they treat the material as if it was all intelligent and sensible.Fitzgerald was such a fine actress that it is a shame she wasn't used more in leads. Bogart gave a decent Irish accent and his scene where he finally puts the moves on Davis is believable and touching. Reagan's character stays drunk and it is funny how as president, he so much behaved like this guy.It is too long. But had the lead been played by a good actor, not Davis, I think it would have been easier to buy into the contrivances.Still, there is nothing on film as fun as the moment when Bette Davis reads the menu.
Red_Identity Continuing my Bette Davis viewing, Dark Victory shows her at her most intense in both ways. She's shown she can be the snarky, tempered woman and here she shows that but she also shows her more vulnerable side. Leigh deserved her Oscar this year for Gone with the Wind, as I consider it the best female performance of all time, but Davis here is in her same level actually. It's probably one of my all-time favorite leading female performances now, and that's quite a feat seeing as how from the five Davis I've seen, there's 3 in the Top 10 now probably. The rest of the film is pretty good too, and while I do think it gets a little too over- the-top in its last act, it still very much worked.