E!'s Pam: Girl on the Loose!
E!'s Pam: Girl on the Loose!
| 03 August 2008 (USA)
SEASON & EPISODES
  • 1
  • Reviews
    SpecialsTarget Disturbing yet enthralling
    Reptileenbu Did you people see the same film I saw?
    Comwayon A Disappointing Continuation
    Frances Chung Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable
    fedor8 "Tee-hee-hee, my name is Pam and I just love animals! Speaking of which, Tommy is so hot! There's real electricity when we're together, as in my new reality show. When my brain cell meets his, real sparks fly! I'm so wild and craaaaaazy, I say the dumbest things, especially when I get angry about how they kill dolphins, baracudas, piranhas and other kitties of the sea. I'm so PETArded!" The "nice", phony, PR-polished, TV-adapted Pamela Anderson is still light years away from being either nice or even half-way intelligent or interesting. But the same can be said for the editors of this unsurprisingly dull show. In one instance, a football player (or coach) says that "no-one knows what Pam does for us (the team) behind the scenes, stuff people don't know about". They actually left that statement as it is. Don't they realize what kind of a reputation this siliconal blond PETArd has? Some people wonder why Ms.Lee/Rock has a reality show in the first place. Three reasons: 1) there's never enough money for those people, 2) she actually thinks she isn't getting enough attention (midlife crisis?), and 3) to promote her PETArded organization that makes Greens look like Mensa champions. Most of the show revolves not around her plastic body but animals and their alleged rights. Neither Pamela nor her PETArds realize what a disservice she does to their questionable New-Age cause by giving us a close look at what a bunch of deeply frustrated misfits the members of this organization are. The fact that PETA would choose this uneducated, utterly clueless bimbo to be their poster-child pretty much suffices on its own in revealing what kind of intellectuals we're dealing with in PETA."Girl On The Loose". What "girl" are they talking about? The only girlishness in this middle-aged Weibchen is to be found in her immature, bird-brained behavior. If any other adult woman acted like this, they'd have her proclaimed insane or mentally-challenged, but because it's an aging, demented Playboy bunny we're supposed to look past the stupidity and the childishness. Is that how this works? Do her silicons and seedy past give her a cart blanche to be an inspiration for morons everywhere? Then again, in a world in which an incestuous, talentless, nepotistic, anorexic loony (that's right: Jolie) can be an Ambassador of Goodwill for the United Nations, anything goes.Some people actually complain that P:GOTL doesn't show her naked, or mud-wrestling, or posing nude. Her silicone breasts, her wiry hands, her bony crooked legs, and her badly made-up face have had enough exposure as it is, methinks... She is every white-trash male's fantasy female: blond and perpetually giggling. Note how they use all kinds of cheap computer-generated trickery to make her look younger. There isn't one single scene in which they show her face "unpolished".P:GOTL is basically just a very lame propaganda show for PETArds to espouse their ridiculous views in. All you ever wanted to know about these freaks you can find in "Penn & Teller" and "South Park": both these shows did very concise studies of what makes PETA tick.The reason this idiotic show mega-flopped is because most people, no matter how daft, simply aren't interested in listening to a dumb blond bimbo rant about animal rights.Don't miss "The Roast Of Pamela Anderson"!
    redvexx Every time you think you are about to see Pam in a sexy outfit the editing makes it where you cant see nothing.The first episode Pam plays in a water fountain wearing a white shirt. But then the editing kicks in and the camera starts shaking and all you get to see is Pam from about 100 feet away getting soaking wet. The scene cuts and then you see Pam riding off in a golf cart, So thanks to the editing you miss it all. Her show Stacked showed more TnA then this and it was about a book store. Maybe they will release it on the DVD version but I have a feeling this show is just an epic FAIL.
    rochelle-rochelle Why in the world does Pamela Lee have her own "reality" show? Give me a break. This show is a headache to watch and I wonder why it's still on the air. The show is over-edited. I mean, there are clips inside of clips inside of clips and there's pink writing on the screen to explain stuff along the way, but you have to look close and read quickly to get it. The sound of the show is poor and a lot of the dialogue is subtitled on the show.What's worst about this show is that it's over-exposed. It's like they brightened the film so it's blurry and bright to make Pamela Lee look younger, I guess.Pam has NOTHING interesting or entertaining to say on her show. It's a bunch of fluff and nothing happens. The story editors must be high school students or something because the editing of the show stinks. This show is hard to watch and hard to follow.Pamela Lee should stick to being a pinup model and stop doing TV and movie work. She's a horrible actress. She's eye-candy and nothing more. At least E!'s "The Girls Next Door" has a plot you can follow each episode and the girls are entertaining. Pamela Lee falls flat.Cancel this show! It's boring, not entertaining, dull, over-exposed, over-edited, has poor audio and Pamela is an idiot. You can't even enjoy her sex appeal because the film is so over-exposed and bright. It's very blurry.