The Shoes of the Fisherman
The Shoes of the Fisherman
G | 14 November 1968 (USA)
The Shoes of the Fisherman Trailers

All eyes focus on the Vatican, watching for the traditional puffs of white smoke that signal the election of the next Pope. This time much more is at stake. The new pontiff may be the only person who can bring peace to a world on the brink of nuclear nightmare.

Reviews
Supelice Dreadfully Boring
Hadrina The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful
Teddie Blake The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.
Kien Navarro Exactly the movie you think it is, but not the movie you want it to be.
gitfiddlegary When asked. if he accepts election, kiril shakes hi head NO, but THEN says he accepts election!
gonecuckoo I have to give this movie an 8 out of 10, which isn't too bad.First off, I remember seeing this movie on cable, in the VERY EARLY days of cable, and I had to have been maybe nine or ten at the time.It wasn't until about a year ago, that I saw it for the first time when I really understood what was going on with the characters.Anthony Quinn, usually a ham and a half, turned in a very restrained, yet passionate performance as a man who was bulldozed into being a pope. He wasn't expecting to even be named as a Cardinal after his release, much less get elected to the Papal Throne! Poor thing looked like he'd been smacked with a board when they all stood up and started nominating him, in spite of VERY vociferous protests.Oskar Werner, who is rapidly becoming one of my favorite actors, was just as passionate as Father Telemond, the troubled young priest (really? Wasn't he in his forties at the time? But that's a teeny quibble.) I watched as he was taken to pieces by the first commission, and yet throughout it all, he didn't really lose his temper. He knew what the outcome would be, no matter what he said, so he told the absolute truth. The Church needed a good kick up the bum and he was the one attempting to do so. Too bad it was pretty much inured to being kicked.There are ways around being silenced and forbidden to publish that he could have taken and didn't.A. Leave the Church (which he admitted that he couldn't do), and publish anyway.B. If he had any REALLY good friends on the outside that were in a position to do so, he could have sold them the publishing rites for a dollar, and publish that way. They weren't bright enough to think of that option or forbid it to him, so technically, he wouldn't have been disobeying them.Unfortunately, he was much too honest of a man and priest to do that, so he accepted their decision.The subplot with David Janssen, his unhappy wife and cutesy putesy chickeeboo could have been eliminated completely, and made for a much tighter film.The subplot with the Chinese nation being on the verge of starvation and NO ONE HELPING!!! was a little bit hard to believe. You can't tell ME that the Red Cross, and other relief organizations wouldn't have come a knocking on China's doors to help out, no matter what the U.S. etc. said. Their purpose is to help those in need, PERIOD END OF STORY!!! I was saddened at the death of Fr. Telemond, but really, since they spent a lot of time talking about it, it was pretty much expected.The scene between Anthony Quinn and Leo McKern was touching. I knew that Cardinal Leone was jealous of the relationship between the Pope and Fr. Telemond, but it was nice to see him finally acknowledging it.The ending was a bit, I dunno, cheesy isn't the word to use, but it didn't seem all that genuine to me.Sure, the speech was nice enough, but it just didn't really have any 'oomph' to it, I suppose.Still and all, excellent movie, but a smidge dull.
casipe-800-138230 Well, for me, "Shoes of the Fisherman" is a science fiction movie about the future of the Roman Catholic Church. I believe the big question posed by the movie is this "What if a Marxist left wing socialist is elected Pope of the Roman Catholic Church? How would that church react to a pope with a agenda like that? How would the world react?" Despite the fact that the future pope, archbishop Lakota (Anthony Quinn) is locked away and tortured in a Soviet Prison Camp for 20 years, His actions and statements shows his preference for Socialism. For instance, at one point, he mentions his violent advocacy of a Socialist sounding "Authentic Christian Revolution with work for all, bread for all, dignity for all men". At the beginning of the film, Kiril rejects the medieval structure of the Roman Catholic Church, where he rejects being a "Prince" of the church because he wants a mission to be with "simple men". At another point of the film, Lakota goes "AWOL" and decides to be a regular "working man's" priest, ditches his "Pope" stuff and hangs out with the "people". At another point in the film, Lakota confesses to Father Telemond (another fellow Radical) about his guilt in being a "Prince" while regular people starve. And at the end, our "Socialist" Pope gives away all the wealth of the church to help the suffering.
moatazmohsen78 This film raced his time before ten years because of the oracle it said about the script of this film that in one day it will come the time of taking the position of Pop from another country not from Italy by elected the Russian priest in the palace of Pop and this event was made after ten years from the making of this film in 1978 after the election of choosing POp John the second the polish priest as first one not from Italy took this place after his successful mission of destroying the communist in Poland before Leig Vaonsa the president of Poland who was put the end of communist in Poland in 1983 the year of awarded Nobel prize in peace. Anthony Quinn succeeded in this role by the brilliant comments from the priests of Vatican that he studied this role in a goodly way by using his wide culture for showing the right sides of Pop of catholic Christians around the world and his comments from his face was the great evidence of his greatness as good actor in the twentieth century.