Comwayon A Disappointing Continuation

2freensel I saw this movie before reading any reviews, and I thought it was very funny. I was very surprised to see the overwhelmingly negative reviews this film received from critics.

Bessie Smyth Great story, amazing characters, superb action, enthralling cinematography. Yes, this is something I am glad I spent money on.

Celia A great movie, one of the best of this year. There was a bit of confusion at one point in the plot, but nothing serious.

JohnHowardReid Copyright 29 July 1922 by Metro Pictures Corporation. New York opening at the Astor: 31 July 1922. U.S. release: 11 September 1922. 10 reels. 10,467 feet. 116 minutes. COMMENT: Selected by The New York Times as one of the best films of the year, the familiar story (re-made with Ronald Colman in 1937 and Stewart Granger in 1952) is given grand treatment here.Some critics have complained of this version's lack of action. While it's true that Ingram does tend to concentrate more on the romance between Lewis Stone's reluctant Rassendyll and the beautiful princess (charmingly enacted by Alice Terry) and also on a closer examination of Black Michael's political intriguing than do the various remakes, there is nonetheless a fair amount of action-and it is well handled too, particularly the final sword duels between hero and villains with all the players including Stone, Holmes and Novarro doing their own fencing and doing it very ably indeed. In addition to these excitements, as might be expected, cinema stylist Rex Ingram has a grand time with all the sets, costumes and panoply of Zenda. It's amazing how close the remakes follow not only the plot and the various incidents, but even the incidentals like the opening knockabout at the railway station. Ramon Novarro's fans will be a little disappointed to find their hero playing the villain (especially as he is not quite as charming as in other versions), but everyone cheers when the beautiful Barbara La Marr enters. AVAILABLE on DVD through Grapevine. Quality rating varies from 5 to 7 out of ten, but almost all is quite watchable

Ian (Flash Review)This story was so intriguing that there were 4 or 5 remakes and/or adaptations based on this 1922 original. There is a prince who will be coronated king the following day. Some other royals hatch a plan to kidnap him, thus allowing one of them to be crowned king. Once the king goes missing, some of his allies spot a lookalike and decide to have him pose in place of the future king. He has to convince the future king's lovely lady as well as his friends that he is the real guy. The story sets up for some fun obstacles and to see how things play out. The film does a good job of organizing several characters, has some nice castle shots yet the pacing could have shifted up a couple gears.

anches-725-976306 As with "Scaramouche", I found this film rather stodgy, with a lacklustre score. Lewis Stone is too old in his dual role and Alice Terry lacked any real charm. This picture belongs to its supporting cast- Barbara LaMarr ("too beautiful for her own good") as Antoinette de Mauban, Colonel Zapt, Captain von Tarlenheim and,of course, Rupert of Hentzau, played with relish and humour by Ramon Novarro. I think I prefer him in this role to any other I have seen him portray; perhaps his popularity with the female audience meant he became stuck in the part of gentle romancer (long after he had become too mature for this) rather than developing his abilities as an actor.

David Atfield Rex Ingram was one of the great visual stylists of the silent cinema, but his version of "The Prisoner of Zenda" is a little slow and ponderous and visually not as interesting as other Ingram films. But it's still pretty good with strong performances from Ingram's wife Alice Terry and the marvellous Lewis Stone. Although Ramon Novarro has top billing, Stone actually has the lead role - Ramon's role is a supporting one - an evil nobleman. But he is splendid - darkly handsome with a little beard and a monocle - and convincingly evil. It is interesting to see him before he became type-cast as the energetic sweet boy - he shows here that he had more range as an actor than he was allowed to show.The entire supporting cast is excellent and, although the sets are ordinary, the costumes are very fine. I expected more from Ingram, but this film is still worthwhile. Does anyone know if the Ingram - Novarro "Scaramouche" is still in existence?