Intcatinfo A Masterpiece!

Sameer Callahan It really made me laugh, but for some moments I was tearing up because I could relate so much.

Adeel Hail Unshakable, witty and deeply felt, the film will be paying emotional dividends for a long, long time.

Billy Ollie Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable

Michael 'Hallows Eve' Smillie This movie starts off okay but then it turns in to a horror movie cliché. I have to admit there are some good parts in this film, but they do not save this film from becoming average and meaningless. Yes the story wasn't too bad but the director failed to deliver what could've been a pretty good film. The acting wasn't bad but in saying that it wasn't good. The characters didn't make me want to care for them either way, in fact I didn't care if they lived or died. As for the 'beast', well it wasn't what you would expect, almost a let down, although not too predictable. The movie wasn't a complete failure but it wasn't, for me, a success. So in saying that I give it a 4 out of 10. Have seen worse.

kosmasp You know it's one thing to make people believe one thing and then reveal to them that it might be something completely different. Or is it? But anyway, this movie tries to be clever in many respects par the dialogue and character development. It's all been said and done before and one twist or another do not change the fact, that it is poorly realized.Of course, this is low budget, so I'm not gonna talk about the effects (that seem decent enough for a movie like this), but it still could have done with a few rewrites. If you haven't watched Teenagers in peril movies, you might find something here for you, but there are so many other (good) movies out there, that you could be watching instead. I hope the filmmakers can come up with a better one, next time around.

Scarecrow-88 Sophie(Holly Weston)is interested in the strange and unusual, her mother's alcoholism and absent father contributing to her morbid curiosities. Sophie wants to see if a legendary "beast of Bodmin " exists and gets her best friend, Jane(Sadie Pickering)to round up some of her friends to go find it, camping out in the woods where it was reputed to have attacked a man and ate his sheep. Tagging along are Jane's boyfriend, Sam(Sacha Dhawan), Sam's pal, Gavin(Stephen Walters), and Jane's brother, Dean(Jonathan Readwin). What none of them know is that an escaped lunatic(Stephen Walters)is lurking about, making his residence an abandoned Catholic children's home, St Joseph's. This troubled young man believes he must protect Sophie(she represents the Virgin Mary, pure and undefiled) from a creature(his own brother, pretty much a human animal)and this herein lies the suspense of the plot..how the hell will Sophie escape from the confines of a cell which is latched from the outside(this detail might just explain why the maniac is so disturbed, his terrifying upbringing in a children's home thanks to a sadistic priest). Is the one imprisoning her actually the person she should be afraid of? A Father Thomas(Colin Tierney)is trying to find Gavin because of his mentor's murder.Murky horror picture following a savage whose cannibalistic ways derived from being kept in a cage with the dogs. Kids out in the woods running across a human beast who tears into them with ferocity. Sophie is connected to Gavin and his brother Vincent, a certain murder which has remained with her, this the cause of those night terrors which awaken her in a cold sweat. The film follows the color palate of the SAW films, shot in dirty brown and green, giving off a dreary, bleak look..quite dark even during the day. The violence is carefully hidden until we see the neck wounds resulting from Vincent's uncontrollable insatiable appetite for human flesh. Gavin isn't exactly held together well mentally, but his motives are sound..he just wants to keep Sophie safe and understands that his brother is a fiend, not responsible for his actions due to a priest's neglect. A great deal of time is spent in the dilapidated Catholic orphanage at night which is why you who decide to watch it may be squinting a lot trying to isolate details which are hard to visualize. Like in other movies, human monsters can take an exorbitant amount of punishment and continue after victims..a hatchet to the ribs, just a scratch, shovel shots to the body and head, easy to recover from. Vincent can even be hit by a car, enter the trunk while the vehicle is moving.

Cbor1 I saw this film at the English premiere and felt compelled to write. This review contains spoilers.Synopsis: The film begins reasonably enough with a young girl ('Sophie') hiding from a monster that enters her room at night. I liked the way this scene was handled and felt there was a palpable sense of fear. However, I felt it went down hill from there. The film fast-forwards to the present day, where the girl has become a 'goth-lite' (to use a character's phrase) woman who enlists a group of her friends to go off in search of a mysterious animal that is terrorising livestock. The good: The locations looked suitably spooky, and I felt that unusually good use was made of the backdrop in the camping scene. Holly Weston ('Sophie') was able to convey most of the emotion of the part, particularly at the end, even if she looked a little too physically perfect (in my opinion). Stephen Martin Walters playing the saner brother, Gavin, was able to engage sympathy. The best part of the film is his final speech.The bad: Some of the dialogue is clunky, particularly between the teen group at the beginning. Some of the acting (particularly from the avenging priest) is extremely wooden. I'm a total coward, yet after the first five minutes, I didn't find this film even remotely scary - too many close-ups on people drooling just made it seem silly to me. I found the supporting teenagers to be too stereotypical for words, though 'Dean' did at least gain sympathy. and finally (here is the main spoiler)I found the film unbelievably crass. To recap: the film is about some kids who go off to find an animal that is attacking people/livestock. They find out that this animal is actually a human who has lived with dogs for years. This human is at times apparently superhuman, sometimes apparently not, for unexplained reasons. The final scene shows the lead character's 'real' motivation was that she had reinterpreted her own childhood sexual abuser (her father) as the demon-type monster in her dreams. I felt that this ending seemed tacked on to the film to give it gravitas, and that because the rest of the film is so light and frankly silly in places, it seemed completely inappropriate. At least films like Last House on the Left keeps a level tone to justify themselves. I watch some pretty hardcore horror, yet because of the sheer ineptness of execution, this is the one I consider to be in questionable taste. Films earn 'worth' through good execution - skillful storytelling and acting - not by having a serious issue stuck on the end up justify the stuff in the middle. I felt it actually made a mockery of the serious things it was trying (through flashbacks etc) to discuss.