SoftInloveRox Horrible, fascist and poorly acted

Orla Zuniga It is interesting even when nothing much happens, which is for most of its 3-hour running time. Read full review

Roxie The thing I enjoyed most about the film is the fact that it doesn't shy away from being a super-sized-cliche;

Francene Odetta It's simply great fun, a winsome film and an occasionally over-the-top luxury fantasy that never flags.

view_and_review If you are like me, or most people, your time is valuable, even leisure time. You only have so much leisure time and it can't be wasted watching pointless drivel.You might ask: "What do you think parodies are all about? You're not watching a potential Oscar nominee." Yes, I know that. I've watched plenty of enjoyable parodies (although far more un-enjoyable ones) and this happens to be one of the worst. Even watching bad parodies I can stomach 10 to 15 minutes of it. I think I got through two minutes of this waste of celluloid.Very unfunny, very vulgar... and it's not unfunny because it was vulgar. It was vulgar in an attempt to be funny but it was a miserable failure.

Seneca27 I have never reviewed a movie on IMDb before. This inspired me to do so. To be fair, I could not make it past the 20 minute mark, and a review should be by someone who has watched the movie in its entirety, however, I believe if a movie is SO BAD you can't even sit through it, that itself says something. Kudos to the people who suffered through it, giving it a chance, but my husband and I couldn't find the remote fast enough! We enjoy stupid humor, but there's a difference between intentionally stupid and just plain dumb. B movies can be great if they're done the right way, this wasn't even B movie quality. Z maybe. The attempts at humor (that I saw) could have been written by a 10 year old who finds farts hysterical. Not just funny, fall-on- the-floor annoying funny. The story could have been good if it was written better, and maybe it got better later, but I didn't stick around to find out. A few people who actually wasted their lives on this trash gave much more in depth reviews. They can explain better why you shouldn't subject yourself to such drivel. Heed their warnings!

movieman_kev Michael and Courtney are a couple with trouble in the bedroom due to an overtly horny mostly unseen demon pleasing Courtney nightly in this completely laugh-free spoof of Paranormal Activity (which is sadly threatening to become its own sub-genre as of late) The two leads lack chemistry or comedic timing, the later might've even been disconcerting had the writing been anything above the sub-par crap that it is. The sheer fact that I sat through it all speaks more to my sheer boredom than anything else or perhaps hopeless positivity that this would get better (ie. vaguely watchable) Spoiler alert: it does not. This awfulness is streaming on Netflix currently but I advise you to steer clear of it.

suite92 Michael and Kasey move into an uncle's house. Michael tries to make a sex film with Kasey, and does not do all that well. Then there is the film over the film aspect: Michael hires a professional porn crew to make the sex film. These people re-enter and leave every so often.Things go bump in the night, and they film some of it, usually ineffectively. Their attempts to get rid of the demon are pitiful.The film mimics various parts of the Paranormal Activity series, for comic effect, supposedly. 'There was something in this bed giving you head.' Oh, my. Other parts of the film parody other films, such as Ghost Busters, or any number of soft porn shows.The Ernie Hudson impersonator was not at all funny or entertaining. This describes all of the vignettes that compose the film. The fake Inception bit was the worst.------Scores------Cinematography: 10/10 Excellent camera work throughout.Sound: 10/10 No problems.Acting: 0/10 Zero. None present.Screenplay: 0/10 The primary question about parodies is, 'did it make me laugh?' The answer is no, not once, not at all.