Reptileenbu
Did you people see the same film I saw?
Odelecol
Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.
Ava-Grace Willis
Story: It's very simple but honestly that is fine.
vciccarello
There are some good things with this movie and some badGOOD- The story: the story is about 4 bad guys that stole something and hit it ina toy car. The toy car gets taken to Alex's (The protagonist) house.
-The traps: The traps were quite entertaining in my opinionBAD- The charecters: What happened? In Home Alone 2, Kevin was 10, and Alex is 8? Also, why is the protagonist's name Alex? Why couldn't it be Kevin?In this movie, this time there are bad guys instead of 2.
Minahzur Rahman
I remember seeing this movie first coming out, and was eagerly excited to watch it: really enjoyed seeing the trailer of it. I wasn't too disappointed that this movie will have a completely different cast compared to the previous two movies because it just wouldn't have worked if the original cast continued to reprise their roles for the third one. Home Alone 3 was still a fine home alone movie - very entertaining! I liked how it is different compared to the previous two home alone movies, and feel it worked really well. Alex was amazing especially with that remote control car. I liked how he was toying with these intruders all throughout the neighbourhood. I really enjoyed the scene where that toy car was taking on the real car head-on. I think it's just as good as the previous two home alone movies, but unique on its own way if that makes sense. Home Alone 3 had a kid deal with 4 CROOKS!!!! so that shows how unique it was. Home Alone 3 made me laugh: some of the scenes were just too funny. I really enjoyed this as a kid. I even had it on tape. It's a fine christmas movie for the family, and I would definitely add it to my watchlist for the christmas season.
kosy-si
This crap doesn't earn time to saw this movie-crap !
witster18
This is a small step down from the first two, but it's still above average. It's definitely not Alex Linz' fault - he's nearly as good Culkin here and nearly makes this a 'good' film. The story is both more implausible AND more interesting than the previous entries. The problem here is that the final 30 minutes is a little scatterbrained and we start to miss Pesci and Company, AND some of the higher production values of the first two films. Sad too, because Linz and the set-up for the film are as good or better, but overall don't believe the hype that its as good or better than the previous two. First of all, its not. Second of all, the fact that its even close, especially given the new cast, is part of the reason its quality has been deceivingly escalated. Decent 59/100
