Linbeymusol Wonderful character development!

GurlyIamBeach Instant Favorite.

Konterr Brilliant and touching

Philippa All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

stangya sorensa Terrible! He's got both eyes and there's no heli-carrier! Not the "Avengers" spin-off I was expecting!

adonis98-743-186503 A grizzled tank commander makes tough decisions as he and his crew fight their way across Germany in April, 1945. Fury is definitely a grizzled and perhaps dark story into the life of a few brave soldiers and a rookie who are pretty much tired of their job and what their pretty much doing in general plus they have turned into monsters of their own for sure. The perfomances by everyone were pretty good especially Brad Pitt. The film has it's flaws tho especially the sequence with the girls was kind of weak to say the least but still a fun war movie for sure. (B+)

astro-56909 Having watched the movie "Rage", immediately there is the thought that the film was created to outperform the popularity of the Russian tank movie "White Tiger". But I could not do it. For someone it turned out a masterpiece, for me it's a failure. The film, which I do not want to revise for the second time, unlike the deep and intelligent White Tiger. The very final scene, when one immobilized Sherman remains alive for half a day, disgusts the film with its unreality. However, like many American military films. In order to make films about the war, it is necessary that this at least somehow correspond to historical reality.

John-Kane25 A product of the video game culture I think. If you want non-stop action, its here. However this movie is masquerading as a wwII flick. Much of the movie is from inside or just outside a Sherman tank. This makes about 1/5th of the movie claustrophobic, not unlike a submarine movie. Its this intimacy of a close knit group of men that is the strongest suit of the movie.The movie seems to try to explain how innocent young men become ruthless killers. With a couple of the American characters portrayed as complete animals. Perhaps more ruthless than the SS themselves. The film is shown more through a young American recruit who only has office training. He gets thrown into a tank and loses his virginity on the battle field and literally later on. His innocence is played off the animalistic crew members who resent him for not yet seeing the cruelty of war. They try to destroy his innocence. This happens in everyday life as well, but is more obvious in this movie. I just can never get over how the tank captain doesn't button up the tank in such obvious situations. Such as numerous sniper opportunities in towns, traveling on roads right next to heavy woods.....etc. Obviously it is to create scenarios that the script requires. The violence in the movie is realistic and maybe over the top for shock value. The utter disregard for caution by the lead tank and the German SS battalion at the end is beyond belief. This movie just uses the wwII setting to set up impossible situations to create the main hero.The one tender scene in the middle of the movie is just there to contrast against the brutal animals in the tank crew.