Jane Eyre
Jane Eyre
| 09 October 1983 (USA)
SEASON & EPISODES
  • 1
  • Reviews
    FeistyUpper If you don't like this, we can't be friends.
    Pacionsbo Absolutely Fantastic
    Humbersi The first must-see film of the year.
    Ariella Broughton It is neither dumb nor smart enough to be fun, and spends way too much time with its boring human characters.
    dosblakey There are only 2 things in this version I did not care for and that is the 30 minute length of the episodes and the outdated screen format (I know that couldn't be helped). Everything else I absolutely loved. I felt that Zelah Clark and Timothy Dalton were Jane and Mr. Rochester. Although plain Jane is not ugly and Zelah is the perfect match-up. I will say that to fully realize how well the actors played these character's reading the novel is a must. Thank you for such a wonderful adaptation.
    oldrockhouse I have loved the Bronte novel Jane Eyre since I was a little girl and have read it many times. I own many editions and have seen every movie. The haunting John Williams music in the George C. Scott Version made that one my favorite for years, but I had never seen this one until last night on Netflix. It was so beautiful. So close to the novel. I loved the use of the lines from the book verbatim. The setting, characters and acting didn't try to push false emotion. But mostly I was blown away by the acting of Timothy Dalton. He was so real...Haunted, downtrodden, a little mad from the pressure and grief of betrayal. But then his fierce love and devotion and hopefulness were disarming. And yes he is very handsome, but also his ferocity lends him a wild look at times. This is the best part I have ever seen him play. Zelah Clarke was perfect. Young in looks and knowledge, but old in experience and hardship. She has the perfect sweet face for Jane. Not really plain, but I don't really know anyone plain when they have such a beautiful vibrant spirit. They didn't feel like they were acting. It felt like it was them. Their passion for each other and chemistry were tangible. Well Done!If you haven't seen or heard the Broadway version of Jane Eyre, you should. The music mirrors the language of the novel in the lyrics. I can't wait to see this again! Magnificent!
    starrygal In one person's review it was mentioned that in this version the lighting was very dark i.e. esp in the gypsy scene but one has to remember that in the Victorian era they didn't have bright electric lights like we do now. it did get dark and they only had candles to work with and then naturally when it was day time they had the natural sunlight. Plus the whole dark atmosphere works with the whole Gothic theme of the novel and atmosphere of thornfield, it is not supposed to be bright and cheery...I love this adaptation of jane eyre and consider it the best one. I won't bother mentioning why because many ppl here have expressed why it is so yeah:)
    decroissance Oh my goodness. I'm happy to see how much people loved this production. I also was transported. Won't bother to see the versions I have missed. Have only seen the William Hurt one, which I hated.Will not talk about T.D.'s fabulousness. Agree wholeheartedly. EXCEPT as one or two people noted, in the crying scene. Poor Timothy, I cringed during that scene. That was not crying. He tried. How hard it must be to do that. I wonder, are there any male actors who can actually burst into tears? I can't think of ANY man in any movie who has done it. But after seeing Emma Thompson nearly explode in Sense and Sensibility, now I know what is possible in a crying scene. I wonder if any man could pull that off. BUT he WAS fabulous overall, there is no doubt about that. Not ugly, of course, but he made himself very severe looking, which worked, and also, as others have noted, he brings Rochester's complex character, in all its variety, to life. But I cannot concur with the majority who praise Ms. Clarke unreservedly. Although I liked her very much for most parts of the series, in the love scenes she fell short, for me. In fact I felt quite sad and disappointed that the full, glorious potential of those scenes was dashed at the last moment. They could have been absolute perfection. Mr. Dalton was so fully, breathtakingly living those scenes -- but it seemed that Ms. Clarke, at certain moments, was passive and uninvolved. It did not seem to be a matter of reserve. I wondered if she was afraid to really respond to Dalton. I don't know what the problem was. My specific complaints are these: 1. In the scene where Rochester finally reveals his love and proposes to Jane, I did not see any changes in her expression to show the moment she came to believe that he was not mocking her. Yes, Jane in general has to carefully control her behavior, has to be reserved, but in this scene, where is the joy? Where is the wonder? Where is the light in her eyes as she realizes, yes, he actually loves me? 2. In the scene after the wedding, when Rochester has waited for her outside her door, she did not, I believe, convey the depths of the conflict the REAL Jane Eyre, out there in imaginary-person land, must have been struggling with. It must have been tearing her into pieces. It must have been strong enough to propel her out the door onto the moors with no food or money. I saw that she felt faint and out of breath and overcome with something, but it did not seem like love. It did not seem like an all-consuming communion that sprung from the depths of her soul, that was so strong that she simply could not overcome it as long as he was near. She had to remove herself from his presence to make them both safe (she believed), and her own physical safety meant nothing to her in light of this struggle. I did not see that love and I did not see that torment. Not in her. In Rochester, in Dalton, it was overwhelming. I wished she would give him back as good as he gave.3. When she returns to Rochester, after he is blind, and she touches his face, and kisses him, and says, "does this feel like a mockery? does this feel like a dream?" -- I just did not see the deep passion, relief, exultation, that, for the Love of God, SHOULD HAVE BEEN THERE! IF ONLY I COULD HAVE BEEN THERE TO HAVE DONE IT PROPERLY! Ahem.Yes, she has schooled herself to reserve, but in these moments, would her emotions not have run away with her? Would she not have had to burst out of the walls she so carefully constructed around her? Would she not have come to life? Yes, I say! In all her other scenes, she was just right -- but in these scenes -- her acting, her mien, her behavior was -- yes -- WOODEN!SIX WEEKS LATER:I wrote these comments in the middle of a major Timothy Dalton phase. It's over now. I'm tempted to delete this comment because it's really embarrassing. But I'll keep it for nostalgic value for now. And by the way, sometimes TD stands in one place and his arm hangs awkwardly at his side and he just talks and that is not good acting. Plus he doesn't talk like a real person. He's deCLAIMING all the time. But who notices when you're under the spell. Very strange.