Diagonaldi Very well executed

Contentar Best movie of this year hands down!

Ariella Broughton It is neither dumb nor smart enough to be fun, and spends way too much time with its boring human characters.

Phillipa Strong acting helps the film overcome an uncertain premise and create characters that hold our attention absolutely.

romanland This movie isn't nearly as good as people say it is. The effects look like they came from a Loony Tunes cartoon, Ares as a character was bland and didn't actually follow the real Ares' personality, there was another drunk Irish stereotype, and Diana walked a border between charming hero, and annoying. Some scenes were well done, like the dancing in the snow, and dancing with the German bad guy. Score: C+

Kirpianuscus Maybe, one of the most inspired films about WWI. and one of the most impressive Wonder Woman performances. because it has the best plot, the director, the actors . I say that without be a fan of Marvel universe and defining the super-heroes of series as "American culture stuffs". but this film has many virtues. first - a seductive perspective about near reality, bitter references, good pledge for fundamental values and , sure, Gal Gadot brilliant work. pieces of mithology and war. and a photo. as good start for a character who, in Superman vs. Batman was the not official lead character and who, in this film, gives more than a beautiful job.

kurovera Filmography - 4/5 An easy score given the time and budget a large production company had for this film. There were bits here and there that were less than ideal but given it's 2 1/2 hour runtime there's a little room for leeway.Plot - 3/5 There could have been so much more to this story or could have been a shorter film. But with such a simple plot and little evidence of any co-occurring events, it leaves the audience guided down a paved street with nothing to distract from the somewhat one-dimensional narrative. Character - 3/5 Some hit and misses. While many say that Diana's character is representative of the island she comes from there is a lot to be desired in the movies ability to show this. There is no excuse for her lack of social graces, or her inability to communicate with others appropriately, or even her lack of forethought. Surely being what can be considered royalty and of a warrior society, even on an isolated island as she was, still requires dealing with general politics and disagreements, learning tactics and dealing with differing opinions. Steve is a pessimistic realist counterbalance to Diana's optimistic naïveté, understanding the facts of war from hands-on experience. While being a significant part of the film, most of his screen time was spent reacting to Diana's actions. His actions, in the end, were heroic and human, though with a superhero next to him there was probably a better option. The side characters - despite their small appearances and lacking background - can sometimes come across as more interesting than the main characters, and for a superhero movie that's unimpressive.Soundtrack - 4/5 It's a DC movie with a large budget, thankfully with someone who knows music on their side.Enjoyment - 3/5 To be fair, it took me two times to finish this movie, the idea and filmography were great, the actual end result had room for improvement. It was drawn out, simple and one-dimensional with a lacking plot and no interest in world building.Overal - 6/10 A very standard Hollywood film, even with superheroes. I wonder how many days it was from Steve and Diana meeting till the end, a whirlwind romance of no explanation, seemingly for exciting power-ups at the death of their love. If she had not loved Steve, or if it was any of the others, would Diana have lost in the end?

nightroses I used to watch "Wonder Woman" TV series as a kid, and found her inspiring. A tough female superhero was a good role model for a girl in the 80's until Helen Slater's Supergirl and animated She-Ra. Before then there was Wonder Woman, although now as an adult, the earlier show looks really funny and quite sexist now. So I looked forward to watching "Wonder Woman" 2017. I was certainly in awe of the island Themyscira where Wonder Woman (Diane) grew up among the Amazons of legend. It was a very magical place like something out of a feminist sci-fi utopia novel. The beautiful and isolated world is interrupted when a WW1 plane arrrives and crashes into the sea. Diane rescues the pilot, Steve, and a load of Germans on a boat emerge through the same mist and all hell breaks lose. The Amazons manage to defeat the Germans, arrows and swords better than guns! Much of the film didnt make a lot of sense. They gave WW a pair of gold wedge heeled boots, a Roman gladiator style metal suit of armour in red and blue colours, with a golden eagle. The tiara has a star on it. The precious god-slaying sword was easily retrieved and supposed to be the ultimate weapon against the enemy of humanity. She agreed to go with Steve to his world, and they get on a boat and sail off. They end up in smoky London of WW1. Wonder Woman spent so long in a London boutique and being childishly silly, then handing over her sword and shield to a secretery, then this debate about secreteries being "slaves". The scenes of WW at the Frontline was pretty cool, but I was greatly disappointed with the rest. David Thewlis turned out to be a big surprise and Steve's decision to sacrifice himself the way he did was a bit "rushed". The film relied heavily on CGI to impress and not much on storyline or script. The characters seemed a bit wooden and even Wonder Woman came across as a bit too naive. It's as if the film makers forgot that she's meant to be an Amazon and a demi goddess.