Protraph Lack of good storyline.

MoPoshy Absolutely brilliant

Hadrina The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful

Neive Bellamy Excellent and certainly provocative... If nothing else, the film is a real conversation starter.

weezeralfalfa In complaining about the excesses of Reconstruction as relates to southern whites, the film totally ignores the main function of the continued military occupation of the South after the war: to enforce the civil rights of African Americans as formalized in the 14th, 15th,and 16th amendments. As long as the audience understands the importance of this omission, this film makes its valid point......The screen play starts right off introducing the prime villain: oily, vindictive scalawag Roger Hale(Lyle Bettger), civil administrator in his neck of the woods. We also meet his mistress: Rose Slater(Jan Sterling), from the wrong side of the tracks, as was Hale. We also meet Captain Kirby((Willard Porter): a Union officer in Hale's pay. They are all present for the hanging of a poor southerner: guilty of murdering Union soldier. His hysterical wife pleads that he was only defending his property. Hale remarks that there should be a couple of hangings each week, just to instill the maintain fear the administration. ......The 'hero', Rockwell Grayson(John Payne)appears only later, after released from a Union prison camp. While there, he received many letters from friends telling of the crooked and mean things Hale had done as administrator. Rockwell forwarded these letters to General Hildebrandt, who took them seriously. He later visited Hale to talk to Hale, ant to Rockwell, who was then employed by Hale, in an undercover role. Hale knew his game was up when the General insisted on taking his books to the state auditor. Thus, he took an extreme measure to prevent this. He devised a plan to make it look like Rockwell killed the General. writing a note telling the General to come to Rockwell's hotel room that evening, signing it Rockwell. His plan worked, as Rockwell panicked, and fled out the window when he heard soldiers coming to investigate the noise of the shot. From then on, Rockwell was assumed to be the killer.......I consider Rose and Rockwell to be the most interesting characters, because they SEEMED the most ambivalent. Rose is ambivalent with respect to Hale and Rockwell, being Hale's mistress, yet increasingly flirting with Rockwell. When Rockwell was wounded by the posse, he headed for Rose's house, since he assumed the posse would soon check out the house of his girlfriend: Jane(Coleen Gray). While Rockwell was passed out from loss of blood, Rose took Hale's note from his pocket and hid it. Rockwell needed that note to compare with samples of his and Hale's writing. Jane, who never gave up hope that Rockwell was innocent, figured out that Rose must have taken the incriminating note. Thus, she rode to Rose's house and, in a dramatic gesture, threatened to stab her if she didn't hand over the note. She then fled to bring the note to the attention of authorities. Meanwhile, Hale's vigilantes raced to Rose's house to look for Rockwell, who had returned to her house. Rockwell ran up the stairs to escape via a back window. Hale ran up the stairs after him, and Rose shot Hale dead. Why did Rose do this? Probably, she saw that Hale's game was up, and decided to definitely switch her loyalty to Rockwell. Also, she had blackmailed Hale into signing a will giving her all his property and money when he died. Don't know if this would stand up in court, since the bequither was murdered by the beneficiary??.......In Rockwell's case, it only APPEARED that he was ambivalent regarding Hale. in order to better accomplish his goal of pinning illegalities on Hale. As things turned out, he wasn't actually the hero. Rather, the 2 women were, in saving and exposing the incriminating note, and in killing Hale ......With the reservation stated in the beginning, I found this an entertaining and valid story. See it at YouTube.

bkoganbing As was pointed out by the only other reviewer of The Vanquished so far, this is one of a gazillion plots of post Civil War stories that take the southern point of view. This is a tradition going back to the Birth Of A Nation and up to and beyond Gone With The Wind. All three are based on historical novels. But the trend in that was also the usual historical interpretations of the times. That changed with the civil rights revolution.John Payne is a local southern hero who while in Yankee prison received many letters from friends about the corrupt rule of local administrator Lyle Bettger. He returns home and goes to work for Bettger, but only to gather evidence of his corruption. Doing it that way makes him a lot of former friends in his town.It was a big mistake to let us know from the beginning that Payne was undercover. Robbed the story of a great deal of suspense.Bettger's part has some antecedents with Gone With The Wind in the peripheral character of Jonas Wilkerson. If you remember Wilkerson who was briefly and memorably played by Victory Jory was a slave overseer whom the O'Hara family kicked out and came back as a Yankee scalawag just like Bettger and just as vindictive and mean. Bettger, who played some of the best villains of the Fifties, has his character far more developed as it is more central to the plot.The one who really makes this film have whatever life it does is Jan Sterling. She plays a white trash girl whom the genteel families of the area snubbed before Fort Sumter. Now she's making them pay big time. Coleen Gray is the girl who Payne left behind and fights for her man whom she never lost faith in.The Vanquished is a competently made enough film, but hardly Gone With The Wind.

MartinHafer Wow--yet another film with the same plot! I must have seen at least a coupe dozen westerns with the exact same plot at this one! This one is about the Reconstruction--a period during which the victorious Union (Northern) troops occupied the South and enforced martial law. The Northerners who came to the South for this were nicknamed 'Carpetbaggers' and Southerners who cooperated with them 'Scallawags'. This period lasted about a decade.When the film begins, you learn that during Reconstruction, tons of evil Yankees and Scallawags (Southerners who helped the Yankees) took control of the South and exploited it horribly--creating injustice and sowing discord. There's only one problem with this theme--it really didn't happen that way! As a history teacher, I recognize that this WAS a very popular view of this period in history books written during the early and middle portion of the 20th century (which, incidentally, coincided with the resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan). The problem is that the books and films fail to mention one important thing--the treatment of blacks. In other words, the view in this period is that the real victims were white men--with no mention of the evils of slavery, the KKK or voter intimidation! Ain't this a bit one-sided?! The truth is that the Northern occupation did, at least temporarily, put a halt to these injustices. Once they left, then in many ways it was 'business as usual'--a far, far different view than you see in these films and books! So, at the outset, I was a bit annoyed at the incorrect history as well as the staleness of the plot. Oh, well...at least it wasn't Randolph Scott in this film, as he made quite a few films with Reconstruction plots.The film begins by showing some atrocities being committed by the leaders of the occupation in one town. Now the film makers DID say that this was not typical of all of the Reconstruction--which is at least a plus.In the following scene, John Payne is talking with some high muckity-mucks in Washington about the problems with Reconstruction in his home town. Though he has not been back to town since the war (after all, he was a prisoner of war being held in a Northern camp), he is sure that the letters from his townsfolk are true in asking relief from their new overlords. So, the well-intentioned folks in DC ask Payne to return and investigate the problem first-hand. But, to see what is REALLY going on, he pretends to be a dispirited man--a guy in complete sympathy with the Union cause and has contempt for his own people. This way, he can get friendly with the baddies--but in the process his old friends want to kill him! What will happen to our intrepid hero and the po' folks of this town? Tune in...or not.Overall, this is a competent film but no more. Payne is fair in the lead but lacks charisma. The story, as I've already indicated, is pretty derivative. Is it worth watching...sure, whatever...