BoardChiri Bad Acting and worse Bad Screenplay

filippaberry84 I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

Philippa All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

Haven Kaycee It is encouraging that the film ends so strongly.Otherwise, it wouldn't have been a particularly memorable film

MartinHafer So much of this film is wonderful. The acting, dialog and writing are very good and I liked the movie very much. However, when the movie ended, it seemed to be missing a few things--and felt a tiny bit incomplete.The film begins during WWII in German occupied France. A Jewish family has been moving about the country and keeping a low profile in order to avoid problems with the fascist government. However, the little boy (who looks about five) has a tendency to get noticed and the parents are worried that his antics will endanger them all. So, they make the heartbreaking decision to have him live with a Catholic family and have him pose as a Christian. The only problem with this plan is that the elderly couple, though very good in most ways and very willing to care for the child, have no idea the kid is a Jew--and the old man hates Jews! This was not all that rare a thing at that time, but it was interesting that the couple had no idea the kid was Jewish--yet they came to love him as their own. In particular, the very anti-Semitic old man really came to love the kid--an oddly ironic situation. It's funny, but on one hand the old man is like Archie Bunker from "All in the Family"--full of hateful prejudices and very set in his ways. Yet, strangely, it was hard to hate the guy--he was often quite sweet and a real character--played wonderfully by veteran Swiss actor Michel Simon (who was at his absolute best here). Plus they did, inadvertently, save the kid's life.What bothered me is that there was never any revelation or resolution in the film. At one moment, the kid was living with the couple and listening to the anti-Semitic rants of the old man (and by this point, the kid also began to hate Jews). The next, the war was over and the kid is instantly shown leaving with his parents. Did the man ever learn that this kid he loved was a Jew? Did his sick views ever moderate or change? How difficult was it for the child to leave or the couple to let him go? Did the kid have any problems reconciling his love for the man yet dealing with the ugliness of his prejudices? All this is left unanswered, as the film literally looks like a chunk of it was missing at the end. Because of this, the film loses a couple points and left me feeling frustrated--I had really loved it up until then. But with no resolution, this can't be a perfect film.By the way, this film was the first full-length film by Claude Berri. It's on a DVD from Criterion that also includes Berri's first short, the Oscar-winning "The Chicken". A very, very good package.

writers_reign Claude Berri has been gracing French cinema as Producer, Writer, Actor and Director for several years and it's a given that at least two or three of his movies are on every discerning viewer's 'Best' list and I don't necessarily mean the obvious, i.e. Jean de Florette and its other half Manon but things like Lucie Aubrac which is also set in Occupied France as is this gem. The idea of teaming a Senior Citizen with a child is far from new and far from played out, witness Papillon less than a decade ago, but it is, by definition, tricky and the trick is in finding a suitable child. Berri struck oil with Alain Cohen and all he had to do was pair him with Michel Simon and the movie practically made itself. That, of course, is the impression an audience gets when a master filmmaker like Berri is on bullhorn. I can add little to the praise, merely second it. A great movie.

life2great This movie shows the power of the media in shaping the minds of simple folk, filling them with irrational prejudices. This shaping is what leads to the rise of totalitarian governments and to Islamic fascism. The best way to fight this, is to have the chance to live with and directly influence, by subtly challenging these prejudices with reason and logic. But the logician, in this case was a nine year old boy who lives in the country with an elderly couple as a way of surviving the final years of Nazi occupied France. The movie is very touching and meaningful. Filmed in black and white, which gives the movies a war time feel. The on-screen relationship between the old man and the young boy, which helps each to grow, is what good story telling is all about.

gelman@attglobal.net This tale of a young Jewish boy sent into the French country side to avoid the possibility/likelihood of a round up of Jews by the Vichy Government parallels Claude Berri's personal experience, I believe. It says at the very beginning of the film that it is an experience seen in retrospect from the vantage point of the child. So, while it is sentimentalized as another commenter wrote on this site, that's what one might expect from a grown up looking back at the adventures of his eight or nine year old self. This is definitely NOT a straight forward narrative from an uninvolved scriptwriter/director. The "Grandfather" with whom the child is lodged hates Jews. He claims to be able to recognize them by their smell, their hooked noses, etc. The role of the Grandfather is brilliantly executed by Michel Simon. Filmed in the sixties in black and white, it still appears occasionally at Jewish film festivals under the title "The Two of Us." While you may despise the Grandfather's bigotry, he's also portrayed as loving toward the boy and lovable. The connection between the Grandfather and the boy, portrayed by Alain Cohen, is actually quite touching. A brief scene at the very end seems to indicate that the boy was reunited with his parents after the war but it passes by so quickly that I'd have to see it again in a stop frame to be sure that the faces of the parents are real and not imagined. Not a great movie, but definitely worth seeing.