Jeanskynebu the audience applauded

GurlyIamBeach Instant Favorite.

PiraBit if their story seems completely bonkers, almost like a feverish work of fiction, you ain't heard nothing yet.

Edwin The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.

a_baron The vast majority of reviewers to date have given this film 1 point; one suspects this is because -1 is not permitted. Having said that, it has two things going for it. The first is that although it is rubbish, it is short rubbish, around an hour and ten minutes. The second is that the soundtrack is truly excellent, there is bundles of music at the end. Unfortunately, music of this quality belongs in a film that will do it justice, so its composers are unlikely to receive the critical acclaim they deserve.What is so bad about this film apart from everything? Let's just mention the acting; if you were in a group of friends and one of your number was struck dead, wouldn't somebody shed a tear? Best not to mention the plot, if you can understand it.

brittneysaid-787-572711 This movie was nothing like the others and confused me a lot. It was really hard to fully focus on the movie and the story behind it. I had high hopes for this movie loving all the movies similar but this one was just ridiculous. The Graphics were all over the place and its really hard for me to say anything good about it.At the start of the movie it gives almost the whole story away and every step is almost as predictable as the last. I really wish they would have branched somehow of the original mummy movies. it was even hard to connect to the characters. This movie went really fast for me and when it finished i felt like i had only been watching it for ten minutes.Don't think this would be a movie i would ever watch again.

keithbenicek This horribly written script only left out one thing that might have saved it from bankrupting the producers and those that were foolish enough to bankroll this epic flop - Teen Heart Throbs with pretty faces, 6-packs, big busted low-cut honey's with tight butts in short-shorts, like all the moronic vampire and zombie films and TV shows aimed at the addle-brained adolescents that flock to them.Trying very hard to look and smell like a Brandon Frasier "Mummy" epic, this is a very poor rip-off. Perhaps the producers should have taken a "slap-stick" approach, rather than attempt a feeble serious guffaw that this turns out to be.OMG, where to start? The Script, acting, "cinema" photography, plot and probably even the food table for the actors and hands was horrible! You'll be more entertained if you go and rent (buy it) one of the original 1932 B&W Boris Karloff "Mummy" films. This one gave me a whole roll of Tums case of indigestion!

MartinHafer Before I began watching The Mummy Resurrected, I wondered how anyone could make a mummy movie with a budget of only $750,000. Then, as I watched the film I understood. Most of the money was spend on special effects (they were reasonably good and a few were very good) but there really wasn't anything left to pay for a good script or actors or a director. And, speaking of director and script, it is very odd that when I looked up this film on IMDb, I noticed that although the cast and producers were listed for the film, this is NOT the case for the director or writer. Perhaps they didn't want to have their names associated with the film—all I know is that it makes no sense to omit these two very important credits.The film is the story of six cute co-eds who are inexplicably in Egypt and are invited along on a mummy hunt. Now considering that these young ladies don't seem to know the first thing about archeology and seem like extras from a college sorority film, I felt perplexed. Yet, somehow we are expected to believe that one of them has a long-lost archaeologist father and instead of mounting a proper expedition with SUPPLIES, appropriate clothing and Egyptologists, for instance, he takes these six cute undergraduates into the desert to look for some ancient burial site. Once there, the three guides he brought are murdered (by whom we never have any idea—as it looks like the writer forgot about this plot thread) and he and the girls just ignore this and go exploring!Later, the girls start dying—one by one. Does the girl whose father brought them there care? Not particularly—she just wants to hang out with daddy. Nor, unfortunately, does the audience care as it took so long for these deaths to occur that you'll find your attention sadly waning. Much of it is because the ladies' reactions were so muted. I've seen women break fingernails and act more upset than these actresses when one of their friends dies. I also had to laugh because one of these well-trained and well outfitted ladies had to use her smart phone as a flashlight inside the tomb because you can only assume they forgot to bring enough flashlights for everyone! So how does it all end? Who cares?!Let's cut to the chase--the film is quite poor. The dialog was often atrocious ('it's like I totally blacked out'), the story was often dull, the edits were occasionally poor (scenes would go from full sun to dusk and back within the same scene) and the film never really made a lot of sense. These folks also didn't really seem like actresses—more like ladies who showed up for a campus kegger and on the way got invited to appear in the film because they had nice hair and looked kinda cute.The bottom line is that the 1932 version with Boris Karloff is a classic. See that instead.