Wordiezett So much average

Beanbioca As Good As It Gets

Chirphymium It's entirely possible that sending the audience out feeling lousy was intentional

Borserie it is finally so absorbing because it plays like a lyrical road odyssey that’s also a detective story.

erikacunanan29 MORE REVIEWS AT booksequalhappiness.blogspot.comREVIEW: I really like the story and the touching parts. It was also full of issues about society and will really get you into thinking afterwards.I really like the songs. Especially the ones with the Latin chants. It sounded amazing and it suited the scenes.I like the scenes. Especially during the fight. The church of Notre Dame looked so beautiful and amazing. Quasimodo is just a precious person that should be protected at all cost. He's so kind towards others even after all that happened to him.Frollo's expression and reactions are so meme worthy. They are either too funny to look at or too infuriating.A nod to the gargoyles named Victor and Hugo (in reference to Victor Hugo, the author of the book).SHOULD YOU WATCH IT: Yes. It was an amazing movie.

zacharycampbell-22681 Based of a book, this dramatic flare or action and brutality is not suitable for a young child, but older kids or adults will like it. 11/10 stars.

justinenyman One of the few Disney films I can watch over and over. The voice talents are fabulous, the songs are written and sound spectacular. A very dark/ thrilling children's film with so much sexual attraction that you may not notice as a child, but as an adult watching you catch some of the inappropriateness that this film has. And that's okay. Aside from Jane and Megara, Esmeralda is drawn with so much beauty. She looks so real as opposed to the various characters we see in these films that look unrealistic.

datautisticgamer-74853 If not for some attempts typical of Disney at that time to make it more friendly for children, this could have been one of their best films; a dark drama documenting corruption within the Roman Catholic church in 1502 France. While it does execute that very well with Frollo, and does feature some of the darkest moments in Disney films (Hellfire is my favorite Disney villain song), I did take off points for the gargoyles, which failed pretty hard as comic reliefs (even more than Dinky and Boomer from The Fox and The Hound), and I was disappointed at how they made Frollo seem not highly devout (which you'd think they'd do for a religious judge), but the latter was less impacting of my score than the former. Of course they made some bad decisions, but it was FAR from deserving a Razzie nomination for Worst Written Film Grossing over $100 Million. Was 1996 a year for absolutely awesome movies that all happened to have formidably stellar writing, or were the people at the Razzies more ticked off about the comic reliefs than I was? Regardless, you might not enjoy the gargoyles, but you will appreciate the messages and themes it has. As I said in the title, I knew that I was going to be secular for the rest of my life, so that I could pass myself off as religiously tolerant, and so I wouldn't be the gypsy or gypsy hunter.