Afouotos Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

Helllins It is both painfully honest and laugh-out-loud funny at the same time.

Edwin The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.

Staci Frederick Blistering performances.

Sulla-2 OK it's not as good as the first two films but it's still a great movie. Those who trash it are just being silly. We have to consider that MIchael Corleone never wanted to be a gangster and throughout his leadership of the family he strove to be legitimate. Yes he did kill people when he had to and I can't forgive him for the unnecessary killing of Fredo. The main plot here is a bit complicated and you have to follow it closely. Pacino was excellent as usual and deserved an oscar nomination. Carcia was an excellent choice for his part but was still playing a gangster rather than the head of the family.So we get to Sophia Coppolla. Yes we know why she got the part. Never the less she is perfect for the part. I was very sad at the end

dvkatzprod-74759 I finally saw it ! As a total devotee of the two previous installments, I avoided seeing the third one, on purpose, people I respect had told me about the disappointment and, quite honestly, I didn't go there. Last night I did and surprise, surprise, it moved me no end. Maybe because I haven't seen the other two in four years. Yes at times is more Ken Russell than Francis Ford Coppola and in my book that's not a bad thing. I was, however, a bit taken aback by the healing in Pacino's Michael as far as Keaton's Kay is concerned. As it nothing had ever happened, while in Diane Keaton the memory of that pain is always present. Talia Shire is a lot of fun as a sort of Madame Sin. Raf Vallone, superb as the doomed Pope John Paul I and then a bit puzzling casting choices that I think they me code for something. George Hamilton, for instance, takes over from where Rubert Duvall left off. Helmut Berger plays the head of the Vatican Bank. Helmut Berger! Just as curious as to find Troy Donahue in The Godfather Part II - All in all, I'm really glad I've seen it and I'm sure I'll see it again.

Yaywalter Not as bad as some make it out to be, but definitely falls well short of the first two movies.Provides decent (albeit somewhat unnecessary) closure to Michael's story, but almost everything else about it is fairly dull and uninteresting... whereas how Godfather parts 1 and 2 had a time dilation effect that made 90 minutes fly by in what felt like only 30, part 3 unfortunately had the inverse effect on me.I will say that Sofia Coppola's performance, while certainly bad, wasn't as horrible or as detrimental to the film as I was led to believe.I rate movies either "awful", "bad", "so-so", "good", or "great". My rating for The Godfather Part III is "so-so", which I've decided equates to 5/10 on IMDb's rating scale.

haventmadeupmymindyet It's maybe one of the most underappreciated movie ever. I still don't get all these complaints about Sofia Coppola's acting, I mean... in my opinion she fits the role with her Italian beauty. As always people follow the critics blindly without thinking about it on their own. Personally, my favourite of the three partly because of Andy Garcia who completely stole the scene. The greatness of this movie is simply undeniable that even the music is so moving.