The Audrey Hepburn Story
The Audrey Hepburn Story
PG | 27 March 2000 (USA)
The Audrey Hepburn Story Trailers

The film spans from Hepburn's early childhood to the 1950s which details her life as a Dutch ballerina, coming to grips with her parents' divorce, and enduring life in the Nazi-occupied Netherlands during World War II. She then settles in the U.S. where she succeeds in making it big as a movie actress, in such movies as Breakfast at Tiffany's.

Reviews
Laikals The greatest movie ever made..!
Stevecorp Don't listen to the negative reviews
Ariella Broughton It is neither dumb nor smart enough to be fun, and spends way too much time with its boring human characters.
Lidia Draper Great example of an old-fashioned, pure-at-heart escapist event movie that doesn't pretend to be anything that it's not and has boat loads of fun being its own ludicrous self.
Dark_liquid I can't say that i'm the greatest Hepburn fan there is, and i'm sure i don't know as many facts about her life as the majority of review authors here, but i sincerely respect and admire her work, charisma and cultural figure. Audrey Hepburn is love at first sight. And as it happens, i saw 'The Audrey Hepburn story' for the first time today. Found it accidentally, while i was searching for something to kill my Saturday morning boredom. At first sight, i was SHOCKED. My brain was processing the name 'Audrey Hepburn' with pleasant feeling, while my eyes were trapped in the greatest of pains by the sight of J.L. Hewitt under that title. ...how could you?!? I usually don't mind seeing J.L.Hewitt on the screen, because her typical roles are shallow and meaningless, and she is just another blurry-whatever-TV face with suspicious amount of talent for me, but she gets some kind of audience anyway, so it's OK. But this was outrageous. She was purely IRRITANT. Even with a good plot, she would have blew it up. The girl simply doesn't fit! Of course, many ingredients are needed in order to make a good movie of any kind, but i believe that even if many of those ingredients are missing, a good lead role can balance the efforts. Audrey Hepburn is magic, aura, energy, charm, beauty, vibration, sunrays, elegance, courage, uniqueness, a feeling of warmth and joy when you see her unforgettable appearance. A reason for pride in all the women in the world. She deserves much, much more. It is as simple as that.
turboshark I heard of how horrible this made for TV movie was - but of course I was curious. I borrowed it from my local library... and I did not expect it to be THIS bad! I'm a die hard Audrey fan, and even I became bored during most of this film. Audrey Hepburn's life boring? Not at all - but they managed to make it seem so. I was becoming agitated with the way this was edited as well. The story kept switching from during the production of Breakfast At Tiffany's to her early life.Jennifer Love Hewitt was miscast, as her performance as Audrey was insufficient. Audrey's persona is impossible to portray in the first place - but JLH? They could have chosen someone more appropriate for the role. I felt embarrassed for her, seeing her attempting an English accent and failing to capture even an ounce Audrey's spirit or charm. Her rendition of Moon River is okay, but calls for a dub - due to the style of her singing - it lost all fragility. As the movie progressed, I became more annoyed with her and irritable - exactly the opposite of how Audrey makes me feel. And I am clueless on why they chose Eric McCormack to be Mel Ferrer. Frances Fisher actually does resemble Ella Hepburn (Audrey's mother) a bit, and Jennifer Love Hewitt's profile looks similar to Audrey's, but that's all.They make too big of a deal with her relationship with Truman Capote. Yes, it is true that he had Marilyn Monroe in mind for the role of Holly Golightly, but he sent Audrey a letter upon hearing about her being cast - and expressed how pleased he was.Avoid this if you're wanting to know more about Audrey. You're better off reading her biographies (Barry Paris's is a fan favorite) and watching her films. This 'tribute' is appalling, for it makes Audrey seem like a tease and a ditz. It especially angered me how they focused so intently on how Audrey wanted to have children, manipulating it a bit to make it seem like she was heartless about the feelings of the others. The ending is also very unsatisfactory.
cltucker I thought the movie was charming, informative and well done. I had no idea Audrey Hepburn was involved in the Dutch underground; chilling. Jennifer Love Hewitt captured the essence of Ms. Hepburn, a difficult task, especially since Jennifer is more than cute while Audrey was a reserved pretty; both are classy. Hewitt's accent was very good, and her portrayal artful and, once again, charming. The supporting cast was first rate with one small exception. Emmy Rossum was great as the teenage Audrey. Frances Fisher as her mother was excellent. I liked the performance of James Hanson by Peter Giles, but found the William Holden characterization a little weak. Overall, I enjoyed the celebration of Audrey Hepburn's life, and must see "Robin and Marian" and "Always" again soon. Audrey's films will be as timeless as her UNICEF work on behalf the world's children. Quite a legacy.
shopaholic_177 REALLY REALLY GOOD !!!!!! Except the fact that Audrey Hepburn was played by Jeniffer Love- Hewitt but other wise it was really good. I thought it portrayed Audrey's life really well, ( by the way I'm her like #1 fan). I thought Audrey Hepburn should be played by Audrey Tautau. She reminds me of Audrey Hepburn. Really Good movie, I really recommend it! I think Audrey had a really powerful and important life, I really think she made a difference in Hollywood! I know you'll love this movie if you love Audrey Hepburn! I rated it 9/10 stars because I loved the movie overall but I really don't like that Jennifer Love-Hewitt. She doesn't suit Audrey Hepburn at all. EWWW, completely doesn't go. Enjoy the movie, I know you will! you know you love me, Gossip Girl