Star Trek: Horizon
Star Trek: Horizon
| 26 February 2016 (USA)
Star Trek: Horizon Trailers

In a time prior to the United Federation of Planets, a young coalition of worlds led by Earth battle the Romulan Star Empire for their very survival.

Reviews
Tedfoldol everything you have heard about this movie is true.
Cleveronix A different way of telling a story
Billie Morin This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows
Sienna-Rose Mclaughlin The movie really just wants to entertain people.
milly903md Poorly written, poorly performed. While it's trying to present a close bond between crew members, the scenes are superficial and don't do a good job making you believe and feel that they actually care about each other, especially since most of the dialog is basically them putting each other down and being sarcastic. Or maybe that's a failed attempt at teasing banter between friends. Although with an ok-ish mildly captivating plot that could have been spinned into something much better, it fails to convince. I can't believe it's a 2016 release!
mtaylor-84428 iv watched horizon three times now and i get more impressed with it the more i watch itjust thick of it just you (and i mean just you not you and a army of people) did this film and that means the CGI the editing the filming the costumes and all the rest that went into making the film on a meager $22,000 i Dir you to do better i don't think i cud now people have commented on the scripted and acting well iv seen worst original star trek,star trek the next generation,star trek deep space 9,star trek voyager and star trek enterprise and lets be honest the acting's not that bad even if its for freenow the tecknow babel this is just nick picking they comment on some thing then leave it up to you to work it out just think of it hes giving the people that watch it to us there imagination and not treating us as being thick
oscar-35 *Spoiler/plot- Star Trek: Horizon 2016. Galactic alien race works with StarFleet to solve a massive problem of the legendary Iconian benevolent race competes with a militaristic alien race for control of the known universe. *Special Stars- Fandom amateur & unknown performers, Paul Lang, Marc Bowers, Ryan Webber, Callie Bussell, Ashley Croft. *Theme- Scientific exploration of the galaxy is possible.*Trivia/location/goofs- internet fan donation project. fan video, online. *Emotion- While visually this project looks professional in it's massive and boring planetary and space flight scenes; the script dialog writing of huge amounts of necessary ex positional plot scenes make this show very slow stone-age, and plodding. What is worse is the project's writers have taken mind-numbing Star Trek 'technobabble' into dizzying lengths for the audience to follow. TOO long CGI shots to provide plot understanding and progress into this confusing plot video drama. Overuse of CGI generated 'lense-flare' and 'soft focus' is annoying to the viewer. The viewer is turned off to watching much more from this fan group. That much plot exposition has made this project hard for audience to get involved, understand and therefore boring for the viewer. Use of trendy 'flavor of the minute' gimmicks like artificial software lens flare makes this video unwatchable.*Based On- Star Trek 'Enteprise' era canon.
d.rust Filled with errors and stilted dialogue, this effort by fans is laudable in its vision. But shaky cam and haze doesn't a good film make.Star Trek: Horizon lacks the grandeur of the feature films: there is no grand stage and Shakespeare feel. What made ST: TWOK great isn't here. There isn't a cracked mirror to see ourselves make things worse: there are ill-fitting uniforms, wooden performances and a very weak enemy. The Romulan Admiral shows how a twenty-something might react to adversity, and probably because the actor playing him is still in his teens.Here's an example of poor writing: Captain Whatsisname orders the crew to abandon ship. But of course, no one does.The ship is out of the fracas: shaky cam is still shivering, swaying and generally producing mal-de-mer.The film would have been better to curb the enthusiasm, spend a little more time on plot, story and dialogue. Who's at fault? The director of course. It *looks* OK on the surface mostly. The CGI effects are compelling, the sets look good, the sound is mostly good. But there is no reason to go beyond the first forty minutes.Lucky for us it's a freebie.