London Has Fallen
London Has Fallen
R | 04 March 2016 (USA)
London Has Fallen Trailers

In London for the Prime Minister's funeral, Mike Banning discovers a plot to assassinate all the attending world leaders.

Reviews
Sexylocher Masterful Movie
RipDelight This is a tender, generous movie that likes its characters and presents them as real people, full of flaws and strengths.
Leoni Haney Yes, absolutely, there is fun to be had, as well as many, many things to go boom, all amid an atmospheric urban jungle.
Roxie The thing I enjoyed most about the film is the fact that it doesn't shy away from being a super-sized-cliche;
tyesharman One of the best modern action films there is, hands down packed with violence, intense scenes and pure rude homour.
merlinsk Olympus has Fallen, like Under Siege was a new twist on the Die Hard theme - one man against terrorists in a confined space. And it worked very well. London Has Fallen, like Under Siege 2 is a waste of space!I loved Olympus Has Fallen and this being the case I was looking forward to its sequel with anticipation since it was first announced. Also, as a British person, the chance to see an action film set in London was an attraction in itself.How disappointed I was!Now, this is an action film I know but disbelief cannot be suspended far enough. There has clearly been no research carried out on security procedures, state occasions, British chain of command or anything else really. It screams laziness on the part of script writers and producers, one of which was star Gerard Butler who is British.... shame on you for not having the balls to point out glaring cultural errors that verge on racism!Don't get me wrong, my beef isn't just with the usual American "Jolly hockey sticks" Downton Abbey view of British people, to be fair all of the Heads of State equally suffer from racist stereotyping. My biggest gripe is that its just not believable.Are we supposed to believe that the terrorists would be able to plan for the Japanese Prime Minister getting stuck in a traffic jam on a bridge? Are we supposed to believe that the terrorists knew the Italian President would decide to have an illicit encounter with his mistress, unguarded, on the roof of Westminster Abbey? Are we supposed to believe that terrorists would be able to not just infiltrate a regiment of Guards, but be able to work it so they were not only in the same regiment, but the same platoon.... every soldier in the platoon was a terrorist I might add... and then, that platoon of terrorists hiding in plain sight in the British Army manage to be on duty in Buckingham Palace on the right day, at the right time to shoot an Angela Merkel clone who stands unguarded with her back to the public standing yards away??!! Oh... and it also seems the entire Metropolitan Police Service are terrorists too! Who came up with this shit?You don't have to be ex military as I am to know that the simplest plan is always the most effective. At the time all this is happening the US President is entering St Pauls Cathedral for the funeral that everybody should be attending instead of galavanting around London. Why didn't the writers use common sense and place all the leaders where they were supposed to be, in the cathedral attending the funeral, and then blow the place up?We're supposed to believe the terrorists orchestrated the death of the Prime Minister to get the world leaders together but then kill them in separate attacks across London instead of the one place they can be certain everyone will be. The blowing up of St Paul Cathedral, a building that survived the blitz when everything around it was flattened, a symbol of British resilience and resistance, would have been spectacular and as heart rending to Brits as the destruction of the White House would be to Americans. But no. The powers that be wanted to destroy or damage as many landmarks as possible so worked the plot around the effects set pieces.That in essence is the problem. Even in a popcorn action flick the plot needs to be the reason for the action, not the action being the reason for a plot.Sadly, this film has tarnished my liking of Olympus Has Fallen, and if there is a sequel? Nope. Sorry. No way!
iNickR The British Prime Minister has died and leaders from around the world have come to London to pay their respects. So too have terrorists.TWO things you'll LIKE about "London Has Fallen": The action is fun and loud. There's lots of bullets and explosions and stuff. Turn up your surround sound and watch the windows vibrate. 2) Not once do you hear the omnipresent magical words usually said by terrorists before they kill the good guys.TWO things you'll DISLIKE: 1) The CGI. It's not very good. Nowadays CGI explosions look good and realistic, and it's an inexpensive (and safer) alternative to the real thing. The CHI here looks like cheap CGI. I've seen better in homemade YouTube videos. 2) The script. This movie and its lead actor are better when there's no dialogue.
adelaidamedrano Obviously this film is good in Producers, Directors, Writers and Actors. First came "Olympus Has Fallen" grossed $170 million on a $70 million budget, not bad. Next this film "London has Fallen"more successful than the first. 2018 is expected to bring Angel has Fallen. Where are the action packed Die Hard or Backdraft films, well London Has Fallen is one such film. I have read this is to similar a story, perhaps overdone and I agree it's perhaps true but it works and its why it got an 8 not 10 from me. Sometimes, If its not broken, don't fix it. In 2013 finally again a great movie year but 2016 and 2017, awful only a few good films. Change is definitely needed not in the actors but in writing, producing and directing. I'd like to see more directing in this style and in line with Ron Howard, Ben Affleck and Michael Bay.