Linbeymusol Wonderful character development!

Stellead Don't listen to the Hype. It's awful

Mandeep Tyson The acting in this movie is really good.

Quiet Muffin This movie tries so hard to be funny, yet it falls flat every time. Just another example of recycled ideas repackaged with women in an attempt to appeal to a certain audience.

reptile-man as a man with Viking and there mythology knowledge I wasn't expecting great things from this film, first of all all characters have very poor American / old English accents not one sound Scandinavia, poor editing , poor lines , weapons and armer look very plastic and poor a child could make better all in all don't even bother with this worse Norse film i have ever seen and I've seen a few you will simply just be wasting your time that you'll never get back glad i only downloaded and not bought / rented thisfrom a universal picture i think they may have realised this was a waste of the £5 it cost to make it

dubyah1 The biggest shame about this movie is that it could have been adequate. I love mythology, and too many people don't know that we owe the Norse gods Tiu, Woden, Thor and Freya for four days of the week, so I settled in for 'Thor: Hammer of the Gods'. I was surprised the man I thought would be Thor turned out to be Baldur (with a faintly Irish accent), and 'Thor' was a puffy stoner defensive lineman who can't even deliver a line like 'Here?! . . . Now?!?' but rather as 'here. Now,' Some pretty good performances by said faintly Irish Baldur (pronounced by stoner Thor as 'Barndoor'), a gorgeous black Scouser as the evil older brother of blond Thor and redheaded Baldur, and the seer Freya, are lost against the cheesiest special effects this side of a community college movie project: I kid you not, Styrofoam-chip snow, wires they don't bother removing, and Fenrir, the wolf at the end of days, as a kinda cuddly CGI pangolin. Eye-rollingly cheesy, but with a couple of million more quid and with ANYONE except the puffy stoner from 'Home Improvement' as Thor, it could have been good. OK, adequate.

carinofranko I have been bedridden for a week with flu and pneumonia and was willing to watch anything except Oprah or The View. The other reviewers have commented eloquently about the idiocy of this film. All I want to add is that I thought the blond bad girl had the sexiest accent, which gave me hope for something to salvage this junior high theater production. The acting and (non)plot was actually comical which made me laugh, which only made me cough and writhe in pain. But I stuck it out waiting for some big sex scene which never came. Just as well, It would have likely made me laugh even more.When the troupe went out and returned to the one-house village again and again after acomplishing nothing, one says "After all this, here we are -AGAIN". I am positive that this was not in the script but just came out and got left in. Perfect.I can only hope that these starving actors at least got lunch for the one day it took to write and film this tome.

San Jay I was misled by a couple of reviews... There are good movies that come out on small budget.. But this one is a real pain.. I am halfway and have stopped viewing.. Nothing's good.. Acting: 0/10. Direction: 0/10. Special Effects: 0/10.. The storyline in this movie is OK.. it could have been a mix of horror-fantasy.. but its all spoiled by the bunch of amateurs (I could not find any definition for 'less than' amateur) . The end result is a movie that does not convey any feeling other than frustration of how you ended up watching it. If you have nothing else to bite.. then go have a walk, don't waste your time on this movie.. I am sure u will be better off..