Stevecorp Don't listen to the negative reviews

ChicDragon It's a mild crowd pleaser for people who are exhausted by blockbusters.

Billie Morin This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

Lidia Draper Great example of an old-fashioned, pure-at-heart escapist event movie that doesn't pretend to be anything that it's not and has boat loads of fun being its own ludicrous self.

MartinHafer The film begins with a cop visiting his girlfriend. While this sounds innocent enough, it isn't---she's in a gambling dive. Why she's there and manipulates him into being there soon becomes evident when the police raid the place—and she sets him up to be killed! It seems that she is a real black widow of a woman! The dead man's partner happens to be the police Captain's son and the son decides to investigate the supposed 'accidental killing' by going undercover—way undercover. He pretends to show dissatisfaction with the police force and gets himself fired. Then, he goes to work for the baddie (John Miljan) in order to determine what really happened to his friend.Aside from a REALLY dumb scene at the 50 minute mark, the film is actually pretty enjoyable as a cheap B-movie. This dumb scene is a cliché I HATE to see in movies—when someone threatens the big boss-man—telling the guy that they'll expose him for what he is. In 100% of the cases, the person making the threat is dead within about 3 seconds—and this case is no different. Think about it—your boss is completely evil and is responsible for countless atrocities and you tell him, when you two are alone, that you're going to the cops!! That's like telling Hannibal Lector that you are the other white meat! You KNOW what's bound to happen and it won't be good!!! But, brain-dead cliché or not, the film is interesting and a decent time-passer.

csteidler Young police officer Kane Richmond pretends to "go bad" in order to get in with the gang of crooks who corrupted and caused the death of his friend. Richmond even goes so far as to let his police captain father think he has disgraced the force. Things are made no less stressful by the fact that Richmond's girlfriend (Pauline Moore) has come to stay with the family since the death of her brother--that same best friend. No, it's not believable for a minute, but what the heck.Wynne Gibson is top-billed here as the co-leader of the gambling ring who intends to put her new recruit to evil use and is in turn betrayed by her partner (the ever-villainous John Miljan). Mary Gordon is earnest as always as the mother and wife of policemen.A little more levity might have livened this one up. As it turned out, it's basically an okay revenge picture whose familiar faces do more to recommend it than its plot or dialog.

classicsoncall I get to watch a bunch of old time Western and Mystery/Crime flicks, and it's striking how the latter are much more unbelievable in terms of execution and common sense. While Westerns never stray very far from a tried and true hero vs villain formula, they at least carry a premise from start to finish that the viewer is able to follow pretty well. Mystery films of the Thirties and Forties on the other hand, often contain elements that simply defy any sort of credibility once they get under way. "Double Cross" starts out reasonably enough, but nosedives quicker than most with a second half that contains so much nonsense that it makes me wonder how movie audiences of the time put up with it. Of course today, it's a hoot to watch 'em, just because there's so much goofy stuff going on.Here's something that threw me in the early going, not related to the above. When I first saw the character of Steve Bronson, I would have sworn it was Jack Webb in the role. The voice was a dead ringer, and it looked like it could have been him too, although now that I check, he would have been too young at the time. Still, I had to check the credits to see what it was all about.There's no reason here to describe the story if you've seen it or read the other reviews on this board. I'd just like to point out some of the stuff to support my opening comments. Take for example, when Nick Taggart (John Miljan) nods assent to his henchmen to open fire on Police Captain Murray (Robert Homans) after Taggart leaves his office. Murray goes out of the room as another cop comes in to help out the Chief. As the bullets fly, said policeman stands up and looks out the window (first mistake), and is then struck and killed by the barrage. But when the Captain comes back into his office, the dead cop is slumped over the Captain's desk. How does that work?Later on, Silver Slipper house photographer Ellen Bronson takes a picture of the Mayor taking a bribe from Nick Taggart through a transom above Taggart's door. Even considering Nick's lame explanation of a light bulb popping, how was he able to conclude that the film in Ellen's camera was a new roll? Then there's that entire scene when Taggart gets completely fed up with his moll Fay (Wynne Gibson), the one where she smashes the recording of her confession of shooting a cop during the raid on the Silver Slipper. Taggart's henchman Cookie and Ellen are right there when he brings her to the room next door to kill her. Were they not supposed to figure out what Fay's scream was all about? But it gets better. My favorite has to do with Taggart's attempt to set up Jim Murray (Kane Richmond) with a van load of stolen furs. During the chase scene, Taggart and his boys began firing on the cops following them, and they appeared to be shooting through some sort of opening in the rear of the truck. However an exterior view of the Dollar Van revealed that the outside walls of the vehicle were solid! The cops giving chase were shooting blind into the van, and wound up killing all the mobsters inside!All of this would make my head hurt if it wasn't so downright comical. Which is why I don't take these films too seriously right from the get go. Every once in a while you get a really good crime drama from these Poverty Row productions, but more often than not, you wind up with something like this. I heartily recommend it.

Hitchcoc This is one of those crime dramas where not much happens and the main character does things he should not be able to. It involves a self imposed undercover situation where a cop acts like he is going bad to get into a crime group. It is basically dull and silly. It has little if any suspense. The characters aren't all that attractive and the cause is a bit hard to swallow. There is a supposed thread of integrity at stake, but mostly it goes about going right where we think it will go. It's as if they needed to get the movie out without putting much time in on it. The actors sleepwalk and talk in little bursts. The B movie didn't demand much. I can see those kids on Saturday morning enjoying the car chases and the gunshots being fired. They really weren't much interested in a story.