Softwing Most undeservingly overhyped movie of all time??

Majorthebys Charming and brutal

Helloturia I have absolutely never seen anything like this movie before. You have to see this movie.

Edwin The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.

slayrrr666 "Death Valley: The Revenge of Bloody Bill" isn't all that bad of a zombie film, with a few flaws.**SPOILERS**Taking a trip to the desert, Gwen, (Chelsea Jean) Buck, (Steven Glinn) Sondra, (Kandis Erickson) Avery, (Scott Carson) Mandy, (Denise Boutte) and Coach Jerry, (Matt Marraccini) to win a National Debate tournament. Picking up stranded hitchhiker Earl, (Gregory Bastien) who ends up kidnapping the group and drags them to the deserted Wild West town of Sunset Valley. Knowing the legend of Bloody Bill, (Jeremy Bouvet) originates from the town, they become weary of entering but are forced to due to their quest for help. Recalling his story as a Union soldier who left the town in fear and panic, the residents of the town soon emerge as bloodthirsty zombies and set upon the gang. Realizing the true reason why they were brought to the town, they learn to trust each other in order to escape the blood-thirsty mob and it's villainous leader.The Good News: This is a pretty above-average zombie film. This here manages to do the one good thing of managing to give the zombies a lot of screen-time here. There's hardly any let-up once they show up for the first time and are at the very least the topic of discussion whenever not on-screen. This here makes the film incredibly fast-paced, always moving forward from one confrontation to another. This one manages to get a large amount of action in, including assaults in the saloon, the main square, and the entire sequence inside the hotel. That's filled with several big scenes that are quite action-packed and really manage to get new moves into it. The relentlessness also manages to give it a really healthy body count here as well. That allows plenty of over-the-top deaths. There's a brutal flesh-ripped-off-cheek, an ax in the back of the head, facial skin ripped clean off, a series of stabbings with a variety of objects, a couple of graphic dismemberments and a huge gaggle of bites and rips throughout that result in huge amounts of blood-loss. There's much more as well, including the non-lethal wounds and all the injuries inflicted on the zombies. There's too much to count, as there's plenty of zombies that bite the dust. The zombies themselves look great, freshly bloody and full of wounds and scars that cover their entire body. With their appearance being quite freaky, they get a lot out of their shock show-ups more-so than others, and these make for great ones at that. The last big positive is that there's actually a main zombie involved in the action throughout that controls the others rather than facing the army. Quite innovative and really helps to put the film over more than it should.The Bad News: There are only few things wrong with this one. The biggest flaw is the running zombies in the film. These aren't scary in the slightest way possible, inspire fear in no one and are such a travesty to the genre that it needs to be driven away as quickly as possible. A zombie isn't scary because it can catch you, it's scary because there's a huge swarming mass that can get you when you least expect it. The fact that this one even has them going so far as to speak is an even bigger flaw than the running factor, which will be the real reason why this one falters. Combined, they're enough to knock the film down some. The only other flaw is that there's a couple of really big stretches in here that are hard to believe. The reanimation of a family member, the curse of the town for no reason and several other incredibly familiar plot-devices show up in here that have now become cliché, and their being trotted out may strike some as nothing new.The Final Verdict: Packed with action and gore but containing some of the most un-scary creatures around, this one is a tough call to zombie purists. The action factor may win over some, so give it a fair shot for completists, and for those that can't overlook the main flaws with the creatures, then seek caution with it.Rated R: Graphic Language and Graphic Violence

bibboy_80 I think people are sleeping on this movie, because I think it will be a cult classic. This movie is a comedy and a horror and the same time, Youn can't help but laugh at some of the parts in the movie. Especially when earl is bit by a zombie and decides to go out like a soldier. The only thing I wish to see is more of is gore. The girl getting her face ate wasn't enough for me. The zombies should had pin her down and ate her eyes, and ate the flesh off her face until you seen nothing but her bones. When I home sitting back and relaxing,I like to keep rewinding the part of earl making a complete fool of bloody bill's zombies. I don't take points off the movie because of the graphics. I think the people who don't like that should support movies like that, so that next time the film company will have enough money to make a movie with better graphics

Knuckle I wish I could say I liked this movie more since I love zombie movies, but in the end, all that this movie has to recommend it are some pretty good effects and a moment or two where it doesn't take itself too seriously.In this horror flick, a group of kids are traveling across the desert to some unspecified destination to participate in a debate competition. Along the way they get hijacked by a drug dealer who just so happens to be engaged in an epic quest to kill the man who screwed him in a dope deal.The good points: effects are good. There are some zombies that don't make the grade, but the same can be said of Dawn of the Dead. I blame the director or cinematographer for letting "filler" zombies get too close to the camera. The last-gasp, cocaine supercharged fury was a nice touch, too.The bad points: LOW production values - and it shows in everything but the zombies (which is where I imagine they spent most of their money). The acting is truly painful at moments, especially when Gwen has to do anything but stand there.5 out of 10. There's worse out there, but that's not enough to recommend it

vladb2001 This is the most idiotic horror i've seen lately. Actors are absolute talentless teens and the big drug dealer seems to be at his very first movie, without any reversals. Please, movie makers, spare us these embarrassing productions. I do not recommend this, except to psychopathic little children =)). Extremely low budget, almost no plot (the entrance of Darrel is forced somehow, ... he was hitch hiking and suddenly he is in the middle of the action...). Well, the music was the only good thing about it. Oh, and what's with the "renoir" golden light on everything. To me - at least - golden doesn't inspire terror, but a heavenly atmosphere ... what were they thinking ? Seen session 9 ? GREEN IS THE COLOUR PPL !