PlatinumRead Just so...so bad

SteinMo What a freaking movie. So many twists and turns. Absolutely intense from start to finish.

Peereddi I was totally surprised at how great this film.You could feel your paranoia rise as the film went on and as you gradually learned the details of the real situation.

Patience Watson One of those movie experiences that is so good it makes you realize you've been grading everything else on a curve.

Aaron1375 This film has me scratching my head. I am wondering how a film that had such a wonderful effect as the scene where the Ted guy just started disintegrating be so bad overall? It also had a whole lot of nudity, but even that could not save it. No, this film was just too bad...though the nudity, a couple of good gore scenes and a very short running time make it at least tolerable. It so could've used a decent actor or actress to make it more watchable, and more development in the plot would not of hurt things.The story has some thing raping women in gruesome fashion. At times the girl is confronted by an ordinary person who suddenly turns and at other it simply attacks in its horrible form...making one wonder why it bothers to conceal its identity at all. Especially the first girl it kills, it did not seem to need to change its identity at all to get to her, yet a person in a locked up house it attacks head on. Well an investigator and a doctor try to solve the case. As they try to find common bonds between the females they learn that all are virgins! Though I found it funny that most of these "virgins" wore more makeup than a cheap hooker. I mean one of them was doing cocaine, you are telling me she has never had sex, but has snorted coke? Well the movie progresses quickly as victim after victim rises from their stay at the hospital to go to a type of gathering.This film had potential, if they had made a porno, but as a horror film it lacks too much. The girls are cute, but so skinny that when they are nude I kept thinking to myself, "a good ten or fifteen pounds more and she would look better". The best looking of the bunch was the first victim. The film also seems to have an awful lot of padding for such a short film, granted the padding did seem to take the form of nudity. However, why couldn't we get a bit more plot development thrown in? I mean, why the heck is that monster using people to get to some gals and why couldn't they get one real star to be in this? I mean the blank stares on the cop and the doctor as this one guy is convulsing and coming apart is beyond bad acting! So there you have it, I almost feel this film started out being an adult film, but they got some more money so instead tried to turn it into a mainstream horror film! The best thing they did here was the Ted scene and the doctor scene. Also, the one monster that was a mess up, looked better than the regular one! It was not the worst movie ever, thanks to these scenes and effects and of course, the nudity, but it needed more development! or less, had they simply made it into an adult film. I mean that scene at the end with the women all gathered sure looked straight out of one.

gavin6942 The Manhattan General Hospital has admitted a string of young women who have been raped by something otherworldly...I like when films start with reptilian creatures grabbing women and carrying them off while gobs of gore splatter on the ground... no disrespect to fair maidens, but seeing them abducted is far more satisfying than if it were young men -- is that sexist? Not sure what is up with the very ugly model and terrible tan lines. I mean, I know it was the 1980s, but is this the best New York had to offer? And then there is a long sequence of her working out nude while cheesy music plays. The film is not that long to begin with -- if you cut out this very gratuitous scene, you could probably have fit the whole film into an hour slot. (Director Tim Kincaid is primarily a gay porn director, though, so maybe this should be expected.) Nice effects on the chest-popping scene... Somehow this went from being distributed by Wizard Video to MGM... I hope Charlie Band made a few bucks off of it.If you want to see some of the ugliest, boniest women naked on screen for far too long, this might be the film for you. Besides that, it does not really have that much to offer. (There is a strange, subtle message that sex before marriage is bad, though -- only virgins get impregnated by "breeders". Be a whore and you will be safe!)

movieman_kev Subterranean dwelling aliens come out of the sewers long enough to rape "virgins" in order to impregnate them with there extraterrestrial seed. A doctor and detective try to figure what the hell is going on.I knew I was in for some ridiculous b-movie crap when even before the title-card shows up we're treated to, bad acting and boobs belonging to a body double in what could be the most obvious film flub ever. And boy oh boy, everyone's favorite gay-porn director, turned crappy b-horror film director, turned gay film director again, Tim Kincaid does not disappoint. Now when I use the term 'crap' for this film, I do so giving it the best most loving connotation. I live for this trash, but if your tolerance for sleaze and utterly atrocious acting isn't high, steer clear of this one as it most definitely is NOT for you.Eye Candy: Frances Raine shows everything with naked yoga, LeeAnne Baker also shows all; Meanwhile Natalie O'Connell shows T&A and Adrianne Lee & Amy Brentino only show breasts (plus the aforementioned body double, and some topless extras)

poustinik As a connoisseur of bad movies, I have to say this one was a kind of gem, "Seinfeld"-esque in that there was precisely nothing to it. The aliens are guys in rubber suits snatched up at a garage sale; the women are supposed to be virgins--but sexy ones--but whether they are or not is entirely pointless as there isn't a shred of sexiness in the entire thing. If this director, Tim Kincaid, DOES direct porn under another name, as has been said, it has to be the blandest 'porn' in the world. If you enjoy sexy nudity, don't bother; the nude women are just women who happen to have no clothes on.Don't look for any sort of meaningful film-making; it looks as if each scene were banged out on a typewriter, rushed to the set, and filmed in the first take, which was used no matter how poor it was, and spliced in with no editing at all. Effects and makeup are tolerable, considering that the makeup guy apparently had a $200 budget to work with (by the way, he also appears as an actor, which tells you something right there).For personal reasons I appreciate the exteriors, which are of the Manhattan I lived in the year this film was made, and also the minimalistic electronic soundtrack, one star each for those. I'd say it's not entertainment--it just makes 77 minutes of your life go away. If you like your horror bland, your acting wooden, and your production values those of an undergraduate college film project, all the while listening to some nostalgic '80s electronica--that would be me when I'm in certain moods--this one's for you.