Baabul
Baabul
| 08 December 2006 (USA)
Baabul Trailers

When his only son dies in an accident, Balraaj urges his depressed daughter-in-law to marry a man who has long loved her in silence.

Reviews
Contentar Best movie of this year hands down!
Peereddi I was totally surprised at how great this film.You could feel your paranoia rise as the film went on and as you gradually learned the details of the real situation.
Kidskycom It's funny watching the elements come together in this complicated scam. On one hand, the set-up isn't quite as complex as it seems, but there's an easy sense of fun in every exchange.
Voxitype Good films always raise compelling questions, whether the format is fiction or documentary fact.
daniel schut I found Baabul a B-category movie with an A-list-casting. The story, about a young girl being widowed, and the challenges she faces to try and get married again, is really an interesting idea, even though I am not sure whether it still is a common social problem amongst Hindustanis.There's two reasons which make the movie quite bad: Salman Khan and Screenplay/Dialogue.I don't know what people see in Salman Khan, but by the gods, this man CAN NOT act. He sounds like he is a half-German, half-Indian class B actor who is dubbing himself over in real-time. His post-modern interpretation of Romantic Love reminds me more of freshly laid asphalt then of anything else. Why do people still hire him? Were they out of money after Amitabh, Malini and Rani signed up?I found him so irritating that I could not suppress a small 'yay' when he gets run over by a car, halfway through the movie. "Great" I thought, "now let's get on with the people who CAN act and make it a good movie".The second reason: at about three quarters of the movie, I suddenly realized something: if at this, or at any point in the movie, any of the characters would suddenly be played by another actor, it probably wouldn't change any of the dialogue, screenplay or anything else. If Rani would have been replaced in every other scene by let's say Kajol, Priyanka Chopra and an anonymous street vendor from Kolkata, the movie would go on. Now, that may seem an interesting achievement, but it isn't: it shows that many of the people involved just did not care about the actors, the plot and the movie. Screenplay and dialogue should be made to fit the actors: this is what makes chemistry and empathy possible. This just felt like the producers and director thought of this movie as 'another day at the office'. This comes out during the climax: at the point where even hard and sturdy men like me should break down and cry: "oh yes, that's so true, how can humans be so cruel?", you just don't feel anything.The reason why I don't give the movie lower then a six, is that: well, at least the movie is tolerable. The camera-work is quite nice, the idea is quite nice, and the songs are not that bad. So, if you must see it, buy it on DVD and watch it at home when you have nothing else to do.
Exxon_1985 I don't like this film for it's really boring,story of a father who wants to satisfy her bride after the death of his son.like every Hindi movie the boy comes from big cities like New York or whatever & just after the entrance,he meets a typical Indian girl,they marry each other during one man still loves the girl & has dined his love to see her happy... You can watch this film which takes a lot of time of you & after it ends you are totally board.Amitabh Bachchan does the better job.as a satisfying father to do the right move whenever necessary.Salman Khan is a bit old to play a young man comes from abroad to fall in love in India.he doesn't play like he should.Rani Mukherjee is my sort of favorite actress in Bollywod,but i got to confess that she isn't prepared for such a role,Hema Malini is unused.she walks in the stage to prove she is there. See,nothing for John Abraham or Om Puri & so many people who are struggling to fix such a boring time consuming picture. Ravi Chopra has made Baghban before 3 years earlier than Baabul.they have the same problem at all.BORING BORING BORING BORING ... Do i recommend Salman Khan to accept himself as a 41 years old man.he is not Prem Choudhary of Maine Pyar Kiya no more.maybe he is Aditya Sekhri at Lucky: No Time for Love,that's all with the film.boring fast food.
Queen_of_pentacles Here we have a quite modern family, son staying in U.S.for 7 years and all that, with the most modern cars, a big luxury house with sprawling lawns, domestic help at the finger tips, and the father and son duo calling each other buddy ! Even the lady of the house can shake the leg or two , to add to the fun ! However, it's the other brother, played by Om Puri, in his typical style, quite convincingly, that plays the part of a square peg in an other wise round hole ! the movie starts off breezily, with lighter moments, romance, and some fun ! however, Salman khan with eye bags, and Rani looking washed out this time, it's a little hard to digest, that they are so new to the game of love ! the age shows ! In fact, Hema Malini looks much more prettier than Rani, even at this age ! the age old formula of the hero hiding his true connections, is once again repeated here ! Over to the birth of a baby, growing up, and all that ! then the sudden accidental death of Salman, and now it's the second chapter, in specially, Rani's life !aware of her earlier friendship with Rajat, played reasonably well, but some how giving an impression of miscasting against Rani, and in this particular role, some questions arise, like why did he not try to find out, how Rani is, when he loved her so deeply ? Then there are all those tension mounting in the family situation, when Amitabh decides to bring Rani and Abraham together, but every body is against ! And then while the other widow in the family, that is Pushpa, enacted by Sarika, speaks out for the first time, about her woes, but briefly, does the old fashioned other brother realizes, that the social customs are not greater than the human beings, traditions could be questioned, if needed ! Happy ending, after much tear jerking ! But the point is, this problem of widow remarriage, is getting absolutely out-dated, specially in the affluent society's ! Premrog, another movie, handling this problem, was much more touching, because it was a period film, and dealt with the traditional household of Lanlords ! Here, in Babul, we have the convenient back drop of a most modern household, with narrow mindsets, only for fueling the crisis, which is more or less artificial, to that extent, and context ! Wouldn't it have been proper for the father-in-law, to take every body in confidence, including his mature wife, rather than flashing an expensive wedding card in her face, or going ahead with the ceremony, with such pomp and show ? but after all, what else can you expect in an Indian cinema, with it's one eye on the box ? the songs are good for the score, but not for the lyrics, especially, the one when Rajat performs live ! they are too prosaic, and lack the flow of a poetic content one expects ! the voices of the play back singers do not match, and therefore, seem odd ! and that Qawali type of Urdu style number, when every body dances Mujara type, is absolutely out of place , for a Hindu family !How can the viewer relate to a problem, which does not touch the cord of probability ? the current situations, and the social scenario, have different problems, as a lot of water has flown under the bridge since then ! Good performances, and a lot of extravaganza simply wasted over an outdated issue ! Tut, Tut, wish the story writer could have at least consulted a sociologist, before coming out with this brilliant idea ! And some tips to Rani ! better stick to your earlier dress designer, and health consultant, otherwise , the end of your career is near ! Stick to your Paheli, and kabhi Alvida.. Chalte Chalte looks, and please eat well ! All which suits Zinta, is not meant for you, Rani, we like you as you are ! And God ! why did they have to pick up the muscle man Salman ? Congratulations Amitabh ! one can watch this movie, at least for your sake, if nothing else !
Rahul Tiwari It's clear here that Ravi Chopra has tried to capitalize on success of Baghbaan. He has tried to collect a similar cast & similar slot but not the plot. The story is too long expressed in too short of a time. Movie has an OK storyline & good concept of Vidhwa Vivah (not sure how much it holds true in 21st century though, its far more different now) but the execution does not give enough time to emotions. The movie moves so fast that its difficult to enjoy the happiness & feel the pain of characters.In first half of the movie it's like a budding love story (Chalte-Chalte), an existing love triangle (KKHH), father-son relationship (Viruddh/Waqt), a happy family story and lots of stuff. And suddenly in second part it becomes a sad story of reincarnation of love (Hum-Tum), re-marriage, traditions & what not. Movie has so much to express but the screenplay does not allow it to be shown efficiently on screen. Movie does has a few gud moments but hardly any time to really enjoy or feel them.Amitabh & Rani have been gr8 as always Amitabh-Hema still look stunning. Even Salmaan & John have given nice performances. Not sure what Parmeet & Aman were doing in the movie though, they have got better work on small screen I guess. Overall performances are fine & movie looks okay too (cinematography). Songs & Music also seems fare.In all the movie is fine & okay for one time watch. However with such a great cast & return of team Baghbaan (even the concept is nice), everyone expected a lot better. That's right...