Keira Brennan The movie is made so realistic it has a lot of that WoW feeling at the right moments and never tooo over the top. the suspense is done so well and the emotion is felt. Very well put together with the music and all.

Ariella Broughton It is neither dumb nor smart enough to be fun, and spends way too much time with its boring human characters.

Frances Chung Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable

Jenni Devyn Worth seeing just to witness how winsome it is.

ImblakRUoffended Not Snow White, not the little mermaid, not the incredibles, not Alladin, not Fantasia? No The first goofy movie is my all time favorite Disney film, there's's just something so genuine, so clever, so charming, so creative about it, and it just oozes a 90's. But this sequel, nah miss me with that. From the horrid clichés to max still acting like a dick, goofy's borderline scary infatuation with his son at this point, to dog/human nipples. Yes I just said that.Pros- The college setting is creative and a nice idea Goofy is a great character and that doesn't change much here, the most likable character in the film, some plot threads are niceCons- Max, one of the protagonists is just so extremely dislikeable through most of the film, this wouldn't be nearly as bad of a problem if we didn't have a whole other film that addressed the whole father/son dynamic before. It's like the kid didn't learn anything at all. Can one character nearly ruin an entire film you ask. For me it's possible.The cliché writing is cringe worthy in spots, plot threads you can see coming from a mile away.Conclusion- The whole film is horribly mediocre, and is not the sequel the first goofy movie deserves. It's not all bad, I'd give it about a 6.

dream_catcher003 ^ Total nutter. The show may be mediocre/OK for some, but for those who loved the first movie, it's a complete bomb.WHERE is Roxanne? And why has Max forgotten everything he learned from the first movie? There's no point questioning the chosen plot lines, like Goofy meeting a woman or the whole cliché college...thing, because the movie is already seven years old. But it helps to rant, and ask again, after an entire movie dedicated to getting the girl, WHERE is Roxanne!?Also, I agree that humiliating Goofy further kinda irks me. I mean, people don't think Goofy is an embarrassment, that was the whole idea of the first movie! Goofy is a lot like my dad, my friends think he's amazing, but he always annoys me. In the end though, we are very much alike, and I have to accept that I'm a lot like him, and that it's OK, because it's cool to be like him. THATS the point! So why do they continue showing Goofy like he's some freak show?

tedg Spoilers herein.There are three things about this little cartoon that should get you up-out-of-your-chair mad. And not just huffing mad, but pounding walls mad.The first is elusive. Walt Disney created Goofy and indeed all of his characters with a single notion: that they would be extremely abstract entities. These were NOT people, and not animals either and not something in between: they were a new type of being altogether. Donald Duck had some of the accouterments of people - a house, (some) clothes, nephews... - but he was deliberately pulled so far away from what a person was that we entered an abstract world. A twilight zone of a different reality that tested the imagination of drawer and viewer.I do not know why the current Disney oafs decided to transmute Goofy into a Fred McMurray surrogate - probably because it can rely on established, tired plot templates. But doing so robs a child of the ability to imagine, to create another world. If you are old enough, think back to how hard you had to work to enter Walt's fantasyland, how that subtly but strongly exercised your ability to perform rewarding abstract reasoning. And compare that to this. No wonder our kids are getting intellectually sick.The second big goof is more obvious. I don't know who thought that sports and intellectual activity were the same, or in any way similar. No one who lives the life of the mind would equate the two in any way, and not in the least in matters of `focus' or `determination.' To so equate the two is so mindnumbingly wrong and would only be done by a corporate entity who sells sports instead of educational programming. Again, this sickens society in no small way.The third goof may not offend you, but it does me. Disney takes the occasion to plug a Disney-owned ESPN product to kids. Now that's downright low.If you are a parent and have a shred of concern about those few early years in which your child wakes up to a thinking person, you'll stay far far away from this. Please. I don't want to pay for more prisons.Ted's Evaluation -- 1 of 3: You can find something better to do with this part of your life.

DanMat6288 wileyjp, how much are you paid to horribly bad-sass perfectly okay movies? $1 million? Two?First off, we all have different opinions on what makes a good cartoon character. And I don't remember any law of a character like Goofy turning from a care-free athletically-challenged guy to a caring father... oh, did I neglect to mention the fact that he's still athletically-challenged for all of you out there?Anyway, SPEAK FOR YOURSELF ON THE GOOFY-FANS OPINION OF THE SHOW! For all you know, many Goofy fans out there may have LOVED the TV show!"I am insulted by the fact that the movie claims that Goofy was in college in the '70's. He was an adult in the 1930's, meaning he was more likely a college student in the 1870's" Ugh! Just reading that makes me want to gag or bang my head off the keyboard (like Wade did in KP episode "Naked Genius") or both! HELLO!? You're making him sound ancient, or like some witch! Even though Goofy cartoons have been living that long HE STILL HAS A NORMAL LIFE-SPAN!"Oh yeah, AND it introduces him to Sylvia, the college librarian, a fellow child of the Summer of Love, and they *gag* GO ON A DATE!!!! This is a hole from which Disney will NEVER be able to dig themselves out. There was a REASON Goofy was not given a "Minnie Mouse" of his own. Goofy is a simple character, and giving him romance with a (hopefully) one-shot character does nothing but kill him" I... I am so shocked with you for saying that! [for this part, Dan's on the verge of tears] YOU SHOULD BE PROUD OF GOOFY! He now has his own girl to love. He's happy. AND THAT SHOULD BE ENOUGH FOR YOU, YOU HORRIBLE SELFISH PIG!!! [bawls like mad][Later, Dan comes back to continue] And where did the brat thing come from? Max was embarrassed by his dads, well, goofy-ness. HAVE YOU EVER HEARD THE EXPRESSION "BABY STEPS"?As for the Pete thing, it wasn't like HE was going back to college! Just be satisfied your precious villain--that's right! Villain!--appeared at all!As for Roxanne, for all we know, she could be going to a different college!As for your comments for the sporting events, NO ONE ASKED WHETHER YOU THOUGHT THEY WERE UNREALISTIC OR NOT! AS LONG AS IT WAS FUNNY AND/OR ENJOYABLE! AND I FOUND IT TO BE GOOD ENOUGH FOR ME!Goofy fans, I assure you, wileyjp is just being one-minded on this. He/she shouldn't be acting like ALL Goofy fans agree with him/her on everything about the Goofy stuff! You may or may not enjoy this movie, but wileyjp should NOT make you judge the "Goof Troop", "A Goofy Movie", or "An Extremely Goofy Movie" just on what she says, just because you're the fans of the same character!Just a message to you all, just because, as a fan, you think that something ruined that thing you liked, DOES NOT MEAN THAT OTHER FANS THINK THE SAME WAY YOU DO!THE DEFENSE RESTS!