Hellen I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

Borgarkeri A bit overrated, but still an amazing film

Nayan Gough A great movie, one of the best of this year. There was a bit of confusion at one point in the plot, but nothing serious.

Leoni Haney Yes, absolutely, there is fun to be had, as well as many, many things to go boom, all amid an atmospheric urban jungle.

Roddypii Despite the special effects being sometimes great and other times 'meh', Alice Through the Looking Glass surprised me a lot! It's very funny, light and pleasant to watch. Once again we saw Anne Hathaway and Helena Bonham Carter carry the movie but Mia Wasikowska is a lot better than before.. her acting is really good in this one. The meanings about Time and Family are really well done in almost every possible way.. the 'cause and effect' is on point. Really good movie.

Michael Ledo The film opens with an incredible scene as Alice (Mia Wasikowska) captain of "The Wonder" eludes Chinese pirates in the middle of a storm through the Straits of Malacca, 1874. She does 'the impossible" something she likes to do "six times before breakfast." When she gets back to London her financial circumstances has taken a turn for the worst. She ends up back in Wonderland where she must go back in time in order to save Hatter Tarrant Hightopp, who believes his parents are alive, but who died. She meets Time (Sacha Baron Cohen), a kinder German version of Rasputin type of man who must endure a rash of puns.As the film progresses, only Alice can save all of time, space, and dimension and realizes you only have one family.This film lacked the action, scenes, drama, and adrenaline flow of the first one. Through the time travel sequences we obtain background information of the queens and why their relationship as sisters fell apart. It seems the Queen of Hearts didn't eat the tarts after all.Mia Wasikowska continues in her female role model, although not as strong as the first feature. These time travel things seldom work too well.

leptir_bez_krila First of all, I want to say that I am not a big fan of the first movie, directed by Tim Burton. I thought it was an OK movie and nothing more. When I heard about this sequel, I couldn't care less. And the trailers didn't do much either to get my interest for the movie. So it took ages before I saw this film. And mama mia, was I wrong about it. This is, in my opinion, one of the most underrated movies that came out this year. It's more interesting than the first one, with a far more interesting story and concept. And in the end, it has a really good message for children about time and how we should use time the best way we can, and that the most important thing is our family. The directing is solid, on par with the first movie. The acting is OK, with some good CGI. The music and art direction is actually were the movie shines. There are some incredible beautiful scenes in this movie. It's definitely eye candy for children but adults too. It is a good family movie, and I would never thought that I would say this, but now I feel sad that this movie didn't do better at the box office. And actually really surprising, after all the first movie made over 300 million domestic and over 1 billion worldwide. So what really happened here ? But they could definitely use more time, especially in the beginning, for characters and story. The movie would gain more momentum and be stronger. Most of the CGI is great, but there are some scenes with bad CGI in it. This movie is definitely a step forward, and I would like to see a third movie, but I doubt we will get one. Families will enjoy this and children will learn one or two thing with this movie too. In the end, I would recommend this movie to everyone, go buy it on blu ray. Christmas is coming, and this will definitely be a great gift for every child who didn't see this movie (according to the box office of this movie, there's a lot of children who didn't see this film). This is a good movie, with more pros than cons. + Visually impressive + Art Direction + Very entertaining - They could take more time for character development and story - Some bad CGIGOOD - 7/10

studioAT Having used the books by Lewis Carroll for the first film there's really nowhere for this sequel (an unneeded one at that) to go in terms of plot.It manages to cobble something together, that is equally as nonsensical as anything Carroll dreamed up, but apart from some big names popping up in their roles from last time (Anne Hathaway, Johnny Depp) there is a strong sense throughout that this is a sequel for the sake for a sequel.I'm not saying the Tim Burton directed first part was a masterpiece, but at least it was grounded on something more solid.