Breakinger A Brilliant Conflict

Grimossfer Clever and entertaining enough to recommend even to members of the 1%

StyleSk8r At first rather annoying in its heavy emphasis on reenactments, this movie ultimately proves fascinating, simply because the complicated, highly dramatic tale it tells still almost defies belief.

Kodie Bird True to its essence, the characters remain on the same line and manage to entertain the viewer, each highlighting their own distinctive qualities or touches.

ray_magunnerc love the show hope it comes back. the jokes are funny also the story line. Keep these kids coming and bringing in the laughs. Reminds me of some kids in high school, who thought they were cool, but weren't. Also when freshmen try to take the senior's girlfriend away from him, but always getting busted. Also the white kid trying to be black. He is funny on how he does it. And special Ted was funny the disabled kid gets his payback. And the fat kid always eating and making it funny. And the blow up doll what a laugh. I hope this gets picked up for many more years. I haven't laughed so hard at the guys trying to be better than they are. Keep up the good work and please bring it back.

markimooplier This is honestly the worst show I've seen on Comedy Central. Another reviewer on IMDb called this show "The Nutshack for black people." He's not wrong.After watching the first few episodes of this show, I went online and checked the reviews. The few I found said this show was pretty average. While they thought the first episodes weren't very funny, they compared it to South Park and The Simpsons, which both didn't become great until a season or two in.Once you see the first few minutes of any episode, you will realize why that comparison doesn't work.I do agree that The Simpsons and South Park didn't hit their stride until the second season. The classic episodes of The Simpsons started being made in the second season, and South Park in season four. But there's one big difference between this show and those two.SOUTH PARK AND THE SIMPSONS WERE ACTUALLY GOOD.Both shows were funny from the start, and even if you don't think that, you really can't deny that they were both groundbreaking (The Simpsons for being one of the first adult animated shows, and South Park for saying the B word).This show isn't funny. None of the jokes are particularly clever, relying mostly on stereotype humor and saying the N word. It's raunchy and in bad taste for the sake of being raunchy and in bad taste. It's closer comparison, South Park, usually uses its raunchiness to illustrate a point. South Park is satirical. This show is not.Another reason I think this is the closer comparison to South Park is that it's art style is purposefully bad. But unlike South Park, which uses it's art style to have a unique, stop-animation feel and to get episodes out quicker, this show looks like it was drawn by a toddler with sharpies and is so dated that it could be put out anytime within the next thirty years and still be equally as timely.This show might have been ground-breaking if it had come out before South Park, but it still probably wouldn't have the same appeal. I will say that you don't need to be original or groundbreaking to be good, you just need to be funny.And that's the problem. It's just not funny.

THEANIMEFANZ OK I know it looks bad but so do all of American cartoons if you're watching for the first time. If you've seen Comedy Central's list of animated shows it fits right in. I compared LoCH with Family Guy but that'll mean family guy is worth having air time or it's fans. LoCH has a white guy name Milk who for being white is kind the Eminem of the show aka the race trying to fit with another race because they like their own race. This show actually has does something no other cartoon show had, actually make me wish this was on fox to replace Family guy. Sure the joke are bad, mostly are about sex drugs and basketball, but who cares at least it's not cutaway gags, offensive, hate full, or anything else family guy is doing. It doesn't my what you think about because it's just a show, it's not a human. Also calling it ugly is like what people said to CC's most important show Sourhpark, can we grow up.

twice-66471 Legends of Chamberlain Heights reminds me of the first episode of South Park with similar profanity, trashy story and weird animation. In 1997 South Park was described as "a witless offering that wants to score as it seeks to be pointedly outrageous and aggressively offensive but clocks in as merely dumb". Nevertheless it was funny and went on to be a hit for Comedy Central. So after one episode, why would anybody rate a whole show with a 1/10 rating. The first episode seems to be a hit or miss with 31 10/10 ratings and 51 1/10 ratings. The first episode of Legends of Chamberlain Heights was extremely funny for me and I encourage people to watch a few more episodes to see where it's headed. 10/10 to push the average.