Solemplex To me, this movie is perfection.

Exoticalot People are voting emotionally.

Odelecol Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.

Fairaher The film makes a home in your brain and the only cure is to see it again.

Robert J. Maxwell Every production ought to be assessed on its own merits but in this case it's impossible if you've seen the 20th-Century Fox version (1953) and read James Jones' post-war novel about the Army and the attack on Pearl Harbor. Comparisons creep unwillingly to mind.First, the novel itself that provided the material for both movies was -- I think the style is called "naturalistic." It's extremely brutal, and it's written in a manner that convinces you that Jones knew exactly what he was writing about. And he did. It makes anything by Ernest Hemingway read like a Jane Austen weeper.The 1953 version was a big excellently directed and acted movie with stars like Burt Lancaster (Sergeant Warden), Frank Sinatra (Angelo Maggio), Montgomery Clift (Robert E. Lee Pruitt), Donna Reed (Lorene Rogers), and Deborah Kerr (Karen Holmes). Fred Zinnemann managed the whole thing flawlessly, as did the supporting cast and the crew. But in 1953, the story had to be sanitized and thus debauched. Captain Dynamite Holmes, a perfect, ambitious Arschloch with the philosophy of a fascist, instead of being promoted as in the novel, is forced to resign from the Army. And Donna Reed's whore had to become some kind of traditional "dance hall girl". And, if I remember the novel, Frank Sinatra's character is beaten to death in the stockade, whereas in 1953 he dies accidentally while trying to escape.Some stories need extended treatment and this is one of them. The 1953 film was like a Reader's Digest condensed version. This one has enough time to include more incidents from the novel, that add local color and flesh out the characters in greater detail. It has time, for instance, to send the protagonist, Steven Railsback (Pruitt), to the stockade. And Railsback does a hard three months. The scenes are STILL not as extravagantly violent and strange as in the novel, in which Pruitt learns to meditate while in solitary confinement. I mean MEDITATE, like a Hindu, connected to the real world only by an insubstantial string of sperm, as Jones put it. I hope I'm giving the impression that it's a powerful novel.The tough but fair top sergeant Warden, Burt Lancaster in 1953, William Devane here, are both compelling figures. Devane brings a more relaxed quality to the role, a sense of comme il faut, that's more realistic than Lancaster's brusque authoritarianism. Yet, there's no way of overpowering Lancaster's simple physical presence. He's big, sinewy, muscular in build and in attitude. Devane looks sadly down on Railsback's body and quietly praises him. (Fade out.) In 1953, Lancaster knelt over Clift's body, said something mocking, then turned to the gaping soldiers and shouted, "What's the matter, ain't you ever seen a dead man before? Get this body OUTTA here!" Railsback is no Montgomery Clift. Hardly anybody was in 1953, though Clift was drunk much of the time. But Railsback's intensity, his defiant commitment, is projected by a taut grin through which a few clenched teeth show. Donna Reed won an Academy Award for playing the hooker against type but she was nevertheless miscast. She's the girl next door, if the girl next door lived in Iowa. She can't handle hysterics. Deborah Kerr was cast against type too in 1953, but in her case it works because she's so elegant and lady-like. She's much less sexy but more believable than Natalie Wood in the role of the captain's adulterous wife. When you watch Natalie Wood, you can never quite shake off the realization that you're watching a performance.I enjoyed it. There aren't many TV movies that even come this close to being the equal of the original. I liked it even more because Buzz Kulik was my director in the superb "Too Young The Hero." My performance as a drunken hobo was widely described as peerless, even though I was only on screen for two seconds. In fact, a lot of my co-workers appear here. Joe Pantoliano was my supporting player in the neglected masterpiece, "The Squeeze", and Kim Basinger was the woman who loved me from afar in the poetic "No Mercy." Robert Davi gave me able support in "Raw Deal," a clever adaptation of "The Merchant of Venice," with Arnold Schwarzenegger as Shylock. (Thanks, Bob. I'll never forget your superlative rendition of La Donna e Mobile.) I also helped Andy Griffith get through an episode of "Matlock" but I've forgotten the title, or at least I'm trying to.

DJAkin Other than Joe Pants, this movie is so so. It's fun to watch that father from EVERYBODY LOVES RAYMOND as a drill sgt. He gets so mean that he even physically abuses his recruits!!! He is mean!! Like I said, unless you like Joe Pants, see the Ol' Blue Eyes version.

sbalwayspays The majority opinion can be wrong, and I think this is the case here, because I find the series much better and armonious than the sober film of the 50's, and more close to the original novel. Besides, you can enjoy one of the finest interpretations offered by Natalie Wood (a though but romantic heroin) and supporter Joe Pantoliano -the great resurrection of Frank Sinatra's spirit- who made clear in this production good part of his fabulous acting way that all of us would appreciate years later- thereafter,Pantoliano will consolidate as one of the best character actors of his time.

bux True, this version of James Jones' classic novel attempts to follow the writer's concept, moreso than the 1953 theatrical version, and it is able to do so since the Hayes Code has lost most of it's grip, BUT...The acting here seems so uninspired and lackluster, that it becomes a chore to grind out the five hours of this TV opus. Devane does well in the first half of this, but around the middle he spirals down to a gum chewing clod and more closely resembles SGT Snorkle of Beetle Bailey fame than rough, tough SGT Ward. Railsback, who shined so brightly as Chuck Manson in "Helter Skelter" (1976), still appears to be trying to portray the Mass Slayer rather than a thirty-year man with the troubles of the world on his back. Wood and Pantaliano turn in the best performances, yet what remains just is not worth staying up late to watch-catch the Lancaster/Clift version even if you've seen it a hundred times...it is far superior.