Linbeymusol Wonderful character development!

Kidskycom It's funny watching the elements come together in this complicated scam. On one hand, the set-up isn't quite as complex as it seems, but there's an easy sense of fun in every exchange.

Senteur As somebody who had not heard any of this before, it became a curious phenomenon to sit and watch a film and slowly have the realities begin to click into place.

Skyler Great movie. Not sure what people expected but I found it highly entertaining.

gonzostyles I have been reading reviews on IMDb for 10 years but this is the first time I am actually submitting one myself.I don't live in Russia but speak the language and saw the film last week. I was born in the United States to Russian immigrants, I was born 2 years after they arrived in the states in the 70's. I grew up around Russian culture and did not speak any English until I began attending school in the states. So I never knew of Vysotsky when he was alive, I do not know what it was like in Russia aside from my knowledge from oral histories passed down to me from my family. To be honest Vysotsky was never mentioned in my home as a child, I did not know of him until much later in my teens after accidentally stumbling upon him. Then as I researched him, it blew my mind as to why almost no one in America knew of this great man. Though he did come to the United States in 1976 and played for major celebrities (Liza Minelli, Robert De Niro, etc) and was profiled on 60 minutes which was the mecca of television journalism at the time. So I was very excited to see this film, after seeing countless documentaries, finally a film version of the great Vysotsky...As far as the good about the film, whoever it may be who portrayed the great Russian Bard did a phenomenal job. You never feel like you are watching an actor but the man himself. The make up was fantastic, sure at certain points it can be seen that it's make up but it does not detract from the suspension of belief.The cinematography was phenomenal, it does not feel any less than a major motion picture release by Hollywood. The colors are vibrant, the scenery is breathtaking, it has the perfect feel of the time period. The supporting cast is decent, the standout performance comes from the KGB agent in charge of pursuing Vysotsky, there are a couple of specific breath taking scenes between the two, yet they do not take place with the two of them together. One scene is while Vysotsky is speaking to his lover in bed and the KGB agent listens in via wiretapping devices. The second scene is when he learns of Vysotsky's "death".The bad is not much but crucial in the sense that if you are expecting to learn about the man himself, this is not the movie for you. The movie takes place over the course of events surrounding Vysotsky's clinical death which took place a year to the day before his death on July 25th 1980. On July 25th, 1979 a battered Vysotsky was clinically dead for several minutes but was eventually revived and this film takes place around the days surrounding this event.To appreciate the film, you already have to have a solid knowledge base of Vysotsky. This film does not touch much if at all on what the man truly meant to the public, his acting career, his stage work, his poetry, etc. So unless you know the immense struggles he faced it is very difficult to appreciate it.The film is not great but it's worth a watch, it's more concerned with the faults of the man than it should be. It fails in concerning itself with the genius and the struggle of the man not with his personal demons but with his majestic abilities to convey with words what his countrymen felt.I also watched some interviews with Nikita Vysotsky (the son of Vladimir) who was involved in the project and he has respect for his father but it is clear from how he speaks about him that their relationship was not a good one, so I don't know how much that played in his input on what we see on the screen.The greatness of Vysotsky, not himself personally but of his phenomenon is that I cannot think of any other similar person in the history of mankind in this sense; Vysotsky appeared in very few films, his recordings were never released during his lifetime on any record label. The state did all it could to block him from the people, only 3 of his poems were officially published in his lifetime. Yet millions of people knew every lyric to his songs, knew his poetry and protected their idol like a g-d. This is where the film misses for me big time, as it does nothing to convey this unique phenomenon.

Vladimir-14 I was biased against watching this movie by poor reviews and I was glad that I did not listen to them. Shame on these reviewers. Too much of Hollywood, I gather. The movie cannot be considered outside of the context of timeframe. It is 1979. Exactly a year before his death. Anyone who knows anything about Vysotskiy knows that he was very ill at that time - his heart started giving in. It was rumored that he had 2 or 3 clinical deaths before he passed away. That's how he is shown in the movie: weak body, but indomitable spirit. And all these talks about money - he only needed money as a tool to be free, to do what he wanted - to move around freely and see his people, his audience. It was clearly shown when he comes out to the scene to meet the spectators, when he should not have to, over enormous chest pain knowing full well, that he could drop dead right there. Nobody needs money that much and whoever accused Vysotskiy (or creators of the movie) of that should be ashamed. The scene with KGB colonel is just perfect - the dialog of truly free person and a faithful servant of the communist regime. And the highlight of this whole movie - when he boards the plane, pulls out a wrapper from the cigarette box to sketch down his next masterpiece poem: it's all in the eyes of his companion looking over his shoulder - all the suffering she went through was just repaid. Yes, there was some wardrobe malfunction: in some scenes the mask did not work really well and one can guess the actor behind this mask. I have two things to say about it: 1) You can't hide dirt from a pig 2) Yes, it was a mask, because real Vysotskiy died in 1980 and if one one really demands perfect special effects to believe, than they should be watching movies that require no imagination whatsoever...Anyway, sorry for the tirade. You can tell I feel too passionate about the subject.

hdvdeo I would say this is film about man who is the symbol of the people versus death. And the death in this film closely related to government and KGB. Death is also can be seen as the Visotskiy inability to further work on his poetry - which is the life. Most people who do not know about Visotskiy, how people lived in Soviet Union, will find this film as waste of time. Most people who know Visotskiy well will expect bio type film. It is not. Audience younger than 40 and who lived in former USSR, may expect true satisfaction. As film it is very good. Soundtrack selection sometimes strange. Actors are excellent, except Visotskiy, dialogs are good.

Tamara Nartichti No, not at all. It's a well made film, but still a disappointment in many ways. Cinematography and scenery were magnificent, but the story was not only awful or vague, it was a bad choice, I'd say. If there was a TV-series about Visotskiy, this movie would be a good episode, CERTAINLY not the pilot one, as a feature it fails.Basically, it looks into a couple of days of a troubled artist. Granted, some important things happened during those days, but to choose that as the story for the movie about Visotskiy? Not a smart move. A great artist is shown as some junkie, who is *bravely* handling his ODs and detox issues. That was the idea, at least, but in fact, it could have been any regular junkie's indifference, any regular junkie's need for a shot, absolutely common lack of responsibility. They might have as well called the movie Some Junkie's Hard OD.This is not what I expected from this movie. They didn't show him as an artist at all, his early years, any speculations about the reasons for his inner pain that is clearly felt in his songs or any of artistic confrontations with colleagues during his years in theater and cinema. That's what I was interested in. Apparently all that mattered to the creators of this film was two days of Visotskiy's life. Important days, I agree, but still just two days as opposed to lifetime of fruitful work.As a fan of his music I was also disappointed by the soundtrack. Those few songs of his that made it into the movie were not his best, were not even close to my favorites or favorites of any other fan that I know. Why those few irrelevant and, frankly, weak songs while he has loads of powerful things, real bombs, real hits? I have no answer.Still, the movie was not bad at all. Camera work and acting was flawless. Comedic relief tolerable, at times even brilliant.I hope to see a real movie about Vladimir Visotskiy some day.