Perry Kate Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

ReaderKenka Let's be realistic.

Nessieldwi Very interesting film. Was caught on the premise when seeing the trailer but unsure as to what the outcome would be for the showing. As it turns out, it was a very good film.

AshUnow This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

David Fowler Re: The "review" by inkslug"Unearthed" is not better than other reviewers would have you believe. It's worse. It's a piece of offal and that's all the comment it deserves. FYI, Ray Harryhausen is an acknowledged genius and his special effects for the original "Jason And The Argonauts" are some of the most brilliant in the history of film. Your epically stupid, staggeringly wrong statement regarding them is a frightening insight into your profound and heartbreaking lack of taste. Stick to things like "Unearthed" and don't bother with genuinely great films like "Jason And The Argonauts". It's clearly pearls before swine and you only embarrass yourself. I know I'm embarrassed for you.

Ray Humphries This coulda been a pretty good flick. The plot, while tried and trite, is interestingly placed geographically -- although you gotta wonder about a county that has a sheriff with only one deputy, even in Arizona. The tie-in with the disappearance of the Anasazi is moderately cleaver. The actors are attractive enough, particularly the women. It's hard to tell if they are talented or skilled, though, because almost all of the movie is **shot in the dark!**Another reviewer observed there was something wrong/strange with this flick. Well, you can't see it, that's what's wrong. The monster roars; the cast squeaks, screams, moans and mumbles, but you can't see anything much. It was **shot in the dark,** and when there's a little light the cinematographer jerks the camera around like a drunken sailor at Mardi Gras. He musta "went to school" on "Blair Witch." It is really hard to have empathy with the characters or to feel their fear in the (presumably) scary parts because the movie was **shot in the dark!** Oh, and the monster looks like an "Alien" knock-off (and not a very good one), but you can't really tell because it was "...".The writer/director Matthew Leutwyler should stick to writing. He may not be really good at that -- what dialogue there is sux -- but he is an absolute farce as a director.

merklekranz First the good news, the movie is only 93 minutes long. Now the really good news, you can turn it off after the first half hour and spend the other hour watching your clock tick. It will prove more interesting than finishing "Unearthed". Scenes with a frantic wobbling camera that are illuminated only with flashlights and glow-sticks, will leave you in the dark about what is going on. Not that you will be missing anything, because you've seen this monster on the loose plot dozens of times already. It goes something like this, people and animals killed, more people killed, monster killed....................................... end of story. - MERK

JJonsey I wanted to watch this, I really did. I like fearnetHD and even if some of the movies suck, I love the fact it exists at all so I give most of the movies they feature at least a chance.Horror movie...check. High def....check. Drunken half naked sheriff chick...check. I still turned it off 20 minutes in. The plot was nonsensical: The road into town blocked. OK....but the premise of the road being blocked is Charlie Murphy driving into town and going around the wreck that blocks the road. So if the wreck blocks the road...how did he get around it and why can't anyone else?Monster: SciFi channel at best. I remember when the SciFi channel made Farscape. They now make garbage movies. This movie reminds me of the later....onlyy worse.I wanted to like this...it was so bad I didn't bother.