ClassyWas Excellent, smart action film.

Sienna-Rose Mclaughlin The movie really just wants to entertain people.

Married Baby Just intense enough to provide a much-needed diversion, just lightweight enough to make you forget about it soon after it’s over. It’s not exactly “good,” per se, but it does what it sets out to do in terms of putting us on edge, which makes it … successful?

Haven Kaycee It is encouraging that the film ends so strongly.Otherwise, it wouldn't have been a particularly memorable film

bombersflyup Despite an interesting premise, Two Dollar Bettor falls well short on delivery.The biggest problem being the main character John Hewitt, he lacks believability. John throws away his life betting on horses, without ever being interested in horse racing. Late in the film, we learn that John has just been betting on the one jockey and that's where his winnings came from and when that jockey wasn't riding, John was losing. Surely you would want to have a reason for your actions and an understanding of what is going on. When he is at the track late in the film, it is like he doesn't know anything. The race calling is also quite repetitive and dull.The whole film is pretty empty really, no depth in any of the characters. There are many scenes at home of his daughters and they're goings on, yet we don't really learn anything about them. The film is fairly short, which is part of the problem. I see no reason why this film couldn't be remade better.

bkoganbing The only gambling I've ever enjoyed in my life is the $2.00 window at the racetrack. I've always liked to see where my $2.00 is being spent. I remember one time going to Finger Lakes racetrack and coming home with four winners out of eight races. Wow, I'm some sort of genius. Needless to say like John Litel in Two Dollar Bettor I learned soon I wasn't.But I never graduated beyond the $2.00 window and that certainly wasn't John Litel. A friend brings him to a racetrack where he's never been and he places a bet and wins. He has some more winners including a big longshot. After that he's placing bets with a bookie whose collector is the seductive Marie Windsor. Litel is good and hooked as only Marie can hook them.But Windsor has her own agenda involving her recently released from prison husband Steve Brodie. Litel's already embezzling from his company and as comptroller he has the access to do it. Let's say it ends badly all around.This independent production from an outfit called Realart Studios looks and feels like an expanded version of one of MGM's Crime Does Not Pay series. The performances are sincere and Marie Windsor is evil as Marie Windsor can only be. Still it's a shoddy production and can't get too high a rating from me.

MartinHafer This is a very frustrating film to watch, as the film has some of the most inconsistent writing I've seen in a very long time. It's sad, as John Litel was great in the lead and the script still had an awful lot to like. Here's the main problem--when the main plot is in play and Litel is acting, the movie is wonderful. But, when he's at home with his family, it is just awful. Despite being a film noir-like film, the scenes at home are like a bad 1950s sit-com--with an awful lot of 'gee whiz' sort of dialog. This portion of the film came off as schmaltzy and fake--something odd for a film that, apart from that, is ultra-realistic and dark!! Perhaps the film was written by Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde!! The film begins at the race track. A middle-aged businessman has been invited there but he seems really bored. He's not a gambler and only places a bet after his friends pressure him. He's very lucky that day and makes a nice little killing. Unfortunately, like often happens with gambling addicts, this initial success only whets his appetite and soon he's a full-fledged gambler--with a full-fledged addiction. Now, he's spending all his savings and his life is a shambles--though so far no one suspects. He even begins stealing from his company and faces jail unless he does something. Where all this takes him is very sinister and exciting--and is a good morality tale about the dangers of gambling without coming off as preachy. Now if only they could have re-done those scenes with his annoying daughters and their equally annoying friends. Yuck! Worth a look AND it is in the public domain. This means you can follow the IMDb link and download the film for free!

David (Handlinghandel) Watching a mediocre print of this movie was like seeing "Detour" for the first time. The movie has a terrible, pedestrian title. The stars don't promise much. Well, of course Marie Windsor is always good and Steve Brodie is a noir staple. But John Litel, as the central figure -- which he is? It's the very suspenseful story of a decent guy getting dragged down into a whirlpool of crime and deceit.Litel is what today would be called a middle-manager. He has an OK job and works hard. He has two daughters in their late teens, whom he adores. He lavishes everything he can afford on them. And, it turns out, more than he can afford.Urged to bet a horse to show at the races, he slowly gets bitten by the gambling bug. From small bets he moves on to a bookie. And who does the bookie send to collect his money but -- Marie Windsor.Far be it from me to say exactly what role her character plays in the story. She looks great, as always. This is all I'm saying. But the Litel character is very likable. The money he wants to win is truly only to continue pampering his daughters. And seeing his decline is painful. (And its shocking.)Though the film seems to have been made on a very low budget, its plot and character development are nuanced. I'm eager to see it again.