Tombstone: The Town Too Tough to Die
Tombstone: The Town Too Tough to Die
NR | 13 June 1942 (USA)
Tombstone: The Town Too Tough to Die Trailers

Uneven version of Wyatt Earp vs. the Clanton Gang with a little romance thrown in haphazardly.

Reviews
Perry Kate Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!
Micah Lloyd Excellent characters with emotional depth. My wife, daughter and granddaughter all enjoyed it...and me, too! Very good movie! You won't be disappointed.
Lidia Draper Great example of an old-fashioned, pure-at-heart escapist event movie that doesn't pretend to be anything that it's not and has boat loads of fun being its own ludicrous self.
Benas Mcloughlin Worth seeing just to witness how winsome it is.
JohnHowardReid SYNOPSIS: Two prospectors, Tadpole (Clem Bevans) and Ed Schieffelin (Wallis Clark), discover silver in the Arizona hills and they name the spot "Tombstone". Years later, they establish the Schieffelin and Foster Mining Properties and with this as a centre, the two rich partners create a town which soon grows big enough to sport "The Epitaph", a newspaper. The editor of the paper writes editorials to chide "the Mayor and his phoney peace officers", because Curly Bill (Edgar Buchanan) and his circle of outlaws really run the town. Things become so tough in the town that Wyatt Earp (Richard Dix), one of three brothers from the Southwest, is pressed into service as Sheriff. NOTES: Locations at Long Valley in the High Sierras, and Lone Pine in the Alabama Hills.COMMENT: Here's Wyatt Earp, Doc Holliday and all our other friends of the O.K. Corral, this time directed by Bill McGann. Although it doesn't quite achieve the epic stature it's obviously aiming for, and suffers by comparison with the other versions, particularly My Darling Clementine and Frontier Marshal, it's still a fascinating, suspenseful, action-packed piece of entertainment.
39-0-13 Previous reviewers of this film damn it with faint praise if that, but I found it noteworthy as yet another chapter in the Wyatt Earp saga as viewed by Hollywood. The real Earp hung around Hollywood till his death around 1929 and got to know some of the movie makers. Stuart Lake's biography was published in 1931, and Clarence Kelland's TOMBSTONE on which this movie is supposedly based, according to the screen credits, was well known. Well, Hollywood and history are only kissing cousins when it comes to factual matters, and this movie brushes along a lot of truths. But the one thing it does well is the depiction of the legendary gunfight at the OK Corral. The actual fight occurred in a very short space and took a very short time totally unlike the depictions in John Ford's MY DARLING CLEMENTINE and the Burt Lancaster/Kirk Douglas GUNFIGHT AT THE OK CORRAL. The depiction here comes closest in the movies to every film and TV version (such as the "You Are There" version) to the actual event as detailed in the many recent histories of Wyatt Earp. It also depicts the murder of Morgan Earp very well since that event occurred soon after the gunfight. As a movie, however, it meanders a lot probably because it tries to tell too many stories at the same time. Earp has to contend not only with unruly cowboys and outlaws but also political corruption at the highest level. The horrendous time waster is spent on Earp's attempt to save a totally fictional person, a young man called Johnny, from a life of crime and to promote the guy's romance with a girl who follows him from Kansas. The antagonist for much of the movie is Curly Bill, played by Edgar Buchanan with much juicy relish, and he has his minions in Ike and Phin Clanton and Indian Charlie, who were real people in Earp's life, but who had no such fates as described in the movie. The shoot out at the end following an abortive robbery of a silver shipment provides an exciting climax, but has no relation to actual events. Sadly, Kent Taylor as Doc Holliday has very little to do to show his acting skills, and Richard Dix as Wyatt Earp is sometimes so low key as to seem he is sleepwalking through a movie he finds boring. Because this film is seldom seen, and has some worthwhile parts to it for western movie fans and for Wyatt Earp fans, I recommend it -- not for its historical accuracy, but for its contribution to myth making.
GManfred Good grief. I must have been watching a different picture than the two reviewers above. This is about the fourth movie containing the famous gunfight at the OK corral I've seen and it is the most uneven version. The others are more action-packed, but this one is a case of a good cast wasted. In order, here are the best "OK corral" movies;1."My Darling Clementine" (46) - Henry Fonda, Victor Mature, Walter Brennan 2."Gunfight At The OK Corral" (57) - Burt Lancaster, Kirk Douglas, Lyle Bettger 3."Frontier Marshal" (39) - Randolph Scott, Cesar Romero, Ward Bond 4."Tombstone, etc..." (42) - Richard Dix, Kent Taylor, Edgar Buchanan. This last one is the one we are reviewing and it is the most disappointing.It starts out with a terrific gun fight by the local hell-raisers, led by Edgar Buchanan. It is put down by Wyatt Earp (Richard Dix), and here follows a long stretch of talking and planning, made worse by the presence of 'Johnny', a young cowhand who is followed to Tombstone by the girl he left behind, Frances Gifford. We are then treated to a romance until the final rousing gunfight between the 'good guys' and the 'bad guys'.Oh, I almost forgot. The celebrated gunfight at the OK corral is squeezed in between romantic encounters for about 30 seconds. It takes place in close-up since the fight is in such a small area (Gunfight at the OK phone booth?) It could have been so much better but too much time was wasted on a love story - it was only 79 minutes long but seemed like hours longer.
frankfob This is an unheralded little gem of a western. Full of rock-solid actors, but no big stars (Richard Dix, the biggest name in the cast, was beginning to settle into character parts after a long career as a leading man), this tight little western moves like lightning. Director William McGann made his name as an action specialist and second-unit director at Warner Bros. (it definitely has the Warner Bros. "look" to it, even though it's from Paramount), and he proved here that he was more than capable of handling a bigger-budget western. Tightly paced, full of rousing action and good performances, it deserves to be better known than it is.