Jeanskynebu the audience applauded

CommentsXp Best movie ever!

Celia A great movie, one of the best of this year. There was a bit of confusion at one point in the plot, but nothing serious.

Darin One of the film's great tricks is that, for a time, you think it will go down a rabbit hole of unrealistic glorification.

Michael_Elliott Uneasy Three, The (1925) *** (out of 4) Often hysterical spoof of Lon Chaney's THE UNHOLY THREE has Charley Chase playing the mastermind of a dimwitted trio of thieves who plan on stealing a priceless jewel. The writing here isn't the greatest nor is the actual spoof the smartest but I don't think there's any doubt that this two-reeler has some of the biggest laughs of the silent era. Chase isn't overly known today, which is a real shame as he remains one of my favorites but it appears he has a cult following that gets bigger and bigger each passing year. There are three downright hilarious sequences here with the first coming with a young child playing with an electric piano cord. The next deals with the good guys being mistaken for the thieves and Chase having to help the detective (Fred Kelsey). The third one happens when Chase goes to buy the kid a balloon to keep him quiet and must try and hide it in his hat when he sees a cop coming. Each one of these scenes had tears flowing down my face from laughing and these scenes are what makes this a must see. Chase is his gem self and Bull Montana is wonderful as the dumb brother-in-law who even manages to look like Chaney in several scenes.

MartinHafer I love Charley Chase films and have probably seen more than 99.99% of the people out there, so don't get the idea that I hate his films--just this one in particular. The main problem with THE UNEASY THREE is that it has very few laughs--almost none. And for a comedy, that's a serious problem! The second problem is that the title would suggest that this film is a parody of the famous Lon Chaney film, THE UNHOLY THREE. Unfortunately, there just aren't enough parallels to make this so. Other than the fact that Charley is one of three thieves and one of the gang looks somewhat like Chaney, the similarities between the two films ends there. There just aren't enough similarities to consider this a burlesque of the much more famous film.Charley, a blonde and an ugly guy are a gang of crooks. Having Charley play such a role is a radical departure--usually he plays more of a decent "every man" character. Regardless, the three go to a fancy party and pretend to be the musical entertainment so that they can steal a priceless brooch. Charely and the ugly guy pretend to play their instruments in a non-funny and non-convincing manner as the blonde dances. Eventually, they succeed in not only stealing the brooch but the child of the lady who threw the party. And, throughout all this, no laughs....none. The closest to a laugh was when Charley and the ugly guy began hitting each other because the kid laughed and thought this was funny. That's really reaching.By the way, Bull Montana plays the ugly guy. If you do see the film, get a load of his cauliflower ears--it's obvious Mr. Montana had been a professional wrestler and for a very long time.

boblipton This is an amusing scattergun burlesque of Tod Browning's crime dramas, such as WHITE TIGER. It comes off well enough but may be a bit obscure to people who have not seen such works. Charley takes the place of Raymond Griffith in top hat and tails; Katherine Grant takes the Priscilla Dean role and Bull Montana even manages to look a bit like Lon Chaney in this kid-glove crime drama without the brooding.The result is amusing, but Charley Chase, who is probably the funniest silent comic you've never heard of lacks the delicate touch of Griffith's performance and the other two leads also can't compare to their equivalents. Director McCarey is interested in gags, not atmosphere. Still, the gags are highly amusing, especially the ones involving the top hat and a balloon. You could do a lot worse.