Matialth Good concept, poorly executed.

Ketrivie It isn't all that great, actually. Really cheesy and very predicable of how certain scenes are gonna turn play out. However, I guess that's the charm of it all, because I would consider this one of my guilty pleasures.

Sameer Callahan It really made me laugh, but for some moments I was tearing up because I could relate so much.

Bob This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

WILLIAM FLANIGAN THE RIVER FUEFUKI (FUEFUKIGAWA). Viewed on Streaming. Restoration = eight (8) stars; cinematography = six (6) stars; subtitles = six (6) stars; choreography = five (5) stars; frame painting / color filtering = two (2) stars; "music" = one (1) star. Director Keisuke Kinoshita's feudal-period drama wherein farmers are given the choice of a slow death as the numbing life of a peasant or a quick one in battle. Four generations (more or less) are shown to prefer the latter (both males and females). That's the movie. Kinoshita employs a boatload of technical tricks to disguise this threadbare, simplistic pacifist plot. Most are not particularly successful. Cinematography ( 2.35:1, black and white) is marred with frames of what look like hand-painted color swatches and objects (in static scenes) that resemble a five-year-old's coloring book. (Very distracting.) Some scenes are shot with color filters (seemingly at random) and an occasional set of freeze frames are tossed into the pot. Script typically has characters providing expository text (by commenting on what they are seeing and the viewer is not) rather than exchanging lines of dialog. Actors are rarely given a chance to reach out to and engage the audience, since the Director persists in using long shots to fill the wide-screen format. Acting (when you can see it in medium shots and close-ups) is not particularly well done. Talented actress Hideko Takamine is pretty much wasted even though she ages about 40 years during the film (her character has a limp which is about the only way the viewer can identify her in all those long shots!). A solitary Noh singer (usually filmed with a blue filter) is used as a Greek Chorus which adds not much to the proceedings. "Music" mainly consists of a temple gong and small hand-held temple bell (no temples are shown in the film). Sound of the latter seems ever present to the point that some viewers may be driven to turn off the audio! The same battle scenes are reused, but given different battle names. Battle deaths are poorly choreographed and far from convincing. Sloppy editing shows ropes employed to keep tourist at bay in one interior set (used for a feudal lord's residence). Subtitle flash rates are occasionally excessive. An insomnia countermeasure! WILLIAM FLANIGAN, PhD.

Jose Eduardo Lefevre I would really love to see again this film, which I've seen in São Paulo in 1961. Besides the positive aspects mentioned by the reviews already posted, I would emphasize another quality: some events are presented two or three times from the point of view of the different characters. As the events are not organized in chronological order, and the situations, faces and happenings are similar, the film seems absolutely confusing, till you realize what is intended to be shown: the reality is repetitive, but unique for each person, and each event must be understood from different angles. It's a pity that this film is not available on DVD.

Michael Neumann There's a rare sense of epic artistry in this unusual and striking medieval saga, directed by Keisuke Kinoshita as more of an aesthetic experience than a conventional drama. The film was designed to resemble a decorative 16th century Japanese scroll, painting spare brushstrokes of vivid color across each panoramic, wide-screen black and white image. It can be difficult (and not really worth the effort) to follow the endless progression of characters, and the manner in which the film unfolds is often more involving than the story it presents. Each leap forward in time approximates the turning of another page, usually to the next in a series of pointless, bloody battles between feudal warlords, with each conflict properly labeled beforehand, identifying the date, location, and principals involved. The battle scenes serve as punctuation, following successive generations of peasant soldiers to their doom, with the repetition suggesting that war is the only eternal aspect of the human condition, and passive resistance is futile.

zandert33 I'm not one to usually comment on movies on IMDb, but I think the fact that the only review that shows up on the site says "Depressing" and gives it a low mark, I had to resolve that issue.This movie is absolutely amazing. Firstly, the scope of the story is really quite amazing. We basically have six generations of one family, and their story. The story itself isn't really complex, but it really does linger in your mind for a while after watching the movie. The basic story is the how futile fighting can be. The acting is top notch, there isn't a bad performance in the lot. I thought the color effects were a little weird, and I'm not sure I understood the point of them. It didn't take away from the movie at all though.This is an amazing film. Is it sad? Yes, it is, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be watched. This is really a hidden gem of Japanese cinema, and I'd love to see it get a US release at some point.