Wordiezett So much average

Softwing Most undeservingly overhyped movie of all time??

PlatinumRead Just so...so bad

Konterr Brilliant and touching

gridoon2018 A very late entry in the long-running Charlie Chan series, "The Feathered Serpent" is cheap, dull and instantly forgettable. For some reason, it shows you who the bad guy is somewhere in the middle, thereby removing the element of mystery from a mystery movie! (although they do throw in a - literally - last minute surprise, for those who stick with the movie until the end, who I suspect are always fewer than those who start watching it). Another problem, which I have had with a couple of other Chan films I've watched, is that the supporting characters (outside of Chan's family and Birmingham) are not distinct enough for the viewer to tell them apart; and yet another is that the sound recording quality is poor and sometimes the lines sound garbled. When you can hear them clearly, admittedly there are a couple of great ones, my favorite being "Number One Son very clever now and then. Must be then!" *1/2 out of 4.

classicsoncall "The Feathered Serpent" is unique among Charlie Chan films for a number of reasons. For one, we learn the identity of the master criminal well before the movie's end. Professor John Stanley (Robert Livingston) has kidnapped colleague Henry Farnsworth to learn the location of an ancient Aztec treasure. Only Farnsworth can decipher the Aztec hieroglyphics that may reveal the location of the riches. Perhaps even more meaningful for fans of the Chan series, Keye Luke has returned after an eleven year absence to reprise his role as Number #1 Son Lee. The last time Luke appeared in a Chan film was in 1937's "Charlie Chan at Monte Carlo", then with Warner Oland in the title role; he had never appeared in a Sidney Toler Chan film. On top of that, this is the only pairing of Keye Luke with Victor Sen Yung, who again appears as Number #2 Son Tommy (although he was Number #2 Son Jimmy in all the Sidney Toler Chan films in which he worked). The movie takes it's name from the ancient Aztec practice of worshiping a feathered snake or serpent. It's a bit difficult getting used to Roland Winters' speech pattern as the Chinese detective in this film, it seems a bit more exaggerated than in his earlier pictures. And I can't imagine why the film makers chose to have Chan run around the Mexican wilderness in his trademark white suit and hat, when a safari suit would have made a lot more sense. The end of the movie plays a lot more like an Abbott and Costello film than a Charlie Chan picture. There's a lot of animated fighting and the Chan brothers actually get a bit violent in pummeling the bad guys, particularly Tommy who repeatedly pounds his opponents' head against a stone step inside the discovered temple; it's actually quite gruesome if you analyze what's going on. But probably the most off kilter moment comes when Charlie himself warns his party to be careful in handling a weapon intended for himself - "Poison dart probably dipped in poison".

Phantom Moonhead Yeah, it's bad but the fact that both Keye Luke and Victor Sen Young appear as No. 1 and No. 2 Sons make it worthwhile. I like the outdoor atmosphere and the wind howling at night. It's like Charlie Chan goes camping.

admjtk1701 Dreadful Monogram Chan film with weak Roland Winters starring. The only item of interest is the paring of both Keye Luke (as Lee Chan) and Victor Sen Young (as Tommy Chan.) Set amidst Mexican pyramids, this is a boring poorly done film. It is sad that Luke and Young together didn't have a better script or budget.