Perry Kate Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

IslandGuru Who payed the critics

Solidrariol Am I Missing Something?

TaryBiggBall It was OK. I don't see why everyone loves it so much. It wasn't very smart or deep or well-directed.

Woodyanders Forlorn young Mina (an endearingly loopy turn by the ever-adorable Misty Mundae) is stuck in an unhappy marriage with stolid and controlling pharmaceutical tycoon Jonathan Harker (a fine portrayal by the lovely Julian Wells). Mina encounters Dracula (exquisitely embodied by the gorgeous Darian Caine) when she longs most for a child and falls under Dracula's wickedly alluring spell. Writer/director Tony Marsiglia brings a peculiarly arresting dreamy'n'heady style to the offbeat premise and does an expert job of carefully crafting a deliriously erotic atmosphere. Of course, we also get oodles of tasty bare female skin and loads of smoking hot girl-on-girl action, with a steamy and tender poolside love scene between Mina and Dracula rating as the definite sensuous and arousing highlight. Moreover, Marsiglia's "try it, do it" experimental avant-garde approach gives this movie a truly inspired sense of all-out pervasive weirdness: Caine and Wells both play their characters as men (Wells even does a from behind sex scene with Mundae!), Mundae's wacky little bat bat monologue is simply jaw-dropping, and towards the end there's without a doubt one of the freakiest attempted rapes to ever grace celluloid. The cast of yummy babes keeps things sultry and watchable throughout: Besides the mighty troika of Mundae, Wells, and Caine (and how can one really go wrong with these three?), there's the foxy Shelly Jones as the lusty and willful Abigal Van Helsing, the delicious Andrea Davis as the predatory bloodsucker Sarah, and cute Casey Jones as enticing and vulnerable teenager Beth. Dang Lenawae's sumptuous cinematography gives the picture a stunningly opulent look. Don Mike's moody score alternates between wonky ambient noise and smooth jazz. An intriguing oddity.

The_Void This is my third film from Seduction Cinema (the other two, coincidentally also directed by Tony Marsiglia), and it's by far the worst. For some reason, the director has attempted to mix mysterious Gothic horror with soft-core lesbian action and the result is truly ridiculous. A lot of the film doesn't make sense, and what does make sense is often hard to decipher because it's all damn boring! If it wasn't for the fact that the film stars the oddly compelling Misty Mundae, I doubt I ever would have seen...it is, therefore, unfortunate that she stars in it. The plot line isn't important; but it has something to do with a bunch of lesbian vampires, one of which is called Countess Dracula. There are some nods to Bram Stoker's classic tale - including character names and a few lines of dialogue, but none of it is clever and it's clear that this is just a lame excuse to film some porn. I'm sure Bram Stoker wouldn't have approved! Aside from Mundae, the film stars some other Seduction Cinema 'luminaries' such as Julian Wells, Andrea Davis and Darian Caine, who is definitely the worst 'Dracula' ever...but on the plus side, she is pretty damn hot! Overall, I really can't recommend this film. There are better vampire films out there, better lesbian porn films out there; and better vampire-lesbian porn films out there. Don't bother!

Boba_Fett1138 To say it kindly; this movie was absolutely terrible.The story is impossible to follow because nothing in it makes really sense. It makes this movie a very annoying one to watch. The movie is just a lame excuse to shoot some lesbian porn sequence's. And what was with the ending? Was it supposed to be a surprise ending? Anyway I didn't understood one thing about this movie, including the ultra-odd ending.Darian Caine is the most boring Dracula in movie history. It made me mad that they let her say classic Dracula lines, like; Listen to them, children of the night, what music they make! Her delivery of those lines is so absolutely horrible, she says it like a..well, porn actress. And why was Jonathan Harker played by a female? It was plain odd and the scene in which Mina finds out that Johnathan is in fact a lady is hilarious! And Van Helsing (also a female character in this movie) shares the bed with Dracula? I don't think so...OK, the cinematography and the directing really ain't that bad and the music is also pretty good, although the main theme is ripped off from Wojciech Kilar's "Dracula" from 1992. This movie is style over substance you may say, only problem is that the style doesn't compensate for the substance.Yep, it bites...1/10http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/

stevebowtie Didn't understand a bit of it - but with babes like that who cares? I used to think that being a vampire meant living in a damp cellar and flying around at night biting people. Oy Vay - did I pick de wrong vampire!! Apparently these girls have anorexia, which means they spend hardly any time feasting and what sucking they do is on each other's clitorises. When they ain't pleasuring each other they're doing it to themselves - with fingers, not lips - they're vampires, not contortionists. In fact it's a good job vampires can fly because these girls must be so sore that walking would be out of the question. If you miss the first few minutes you could be forgiven for thinking that you'd tuned into the porno channel - but keep watching and you'll be drawn into a suffocating dreamworld by the superb quality of the direction, the soundtrack and the filming (almost said "shooting" but there's only one man in the film and he's dead before he can rise to the occasion. So no hairy arses pumping up and down - excellent). The acting is retrained and creates a nightmarish atmosphere that is compelling. I couldn't stop watching, but then I'm a guy. Misty Mundae, mmmmm ..... tastier than Ice Cream Sundae .