In the Name of the King III
In the Name of the King III
R | 11 March 2014 (USA)
In the Name of the King III Trailers

Hazen Kaine, an American contract killer living in Sofia, Bulgaria, gets more than he bargains for when he enters into a contract with the mob. One last job before he gets out and starts a new life for himself. The targets: the three children of royal billionaire Andon Dupont. Seems simple enough, or so he thought. Hazen apprehends the children, and before he can blink an eye, a simple necklace worn by one of the children sends his life spiraling back to medieval times. Now completely out of his element, Hazen fights for his life as he tries to escape a medieval army and a fierce fire-breathing dragon.

Reviews
Hadrina The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful
pointyfilippa The movie runs out of plot and jokes well before the end of a two-hour running time, long for a light comedy.
Geraldine The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.
Brooklynn There's a more than satisfactory amount of boom-boom in the movie's trim running time.
Michael Ledo Dominic Purcell has taken over the role of the tough guy as Hazen Kaine. He is a hitman in Bulgaria and is given one last job before he retires, and that is to kill the two young daughters of Bulgarian royalty. He kidnaps them and locks them in a sealand. He takes from the older girl a medallion, one that matches a forearm tattoo he got in California. The next thing you know he is transported back into time...a time in Bulgarian history when they had a fire breathing dragon and spoke modern English with Eastern European accents.He discovers that because of a tattoo which his now dead wife liked, he is destined to lead an army against the bad guys, fend off a dragon, and oh yea, there are these princesses babes with swords, the older of which doesn't like him. But in order to get back to the future, he will have to do it. I think you can write the rest of the story on your own, toss in a good shaman, and dress the bad guys in black. In fact you could script a better tale.You don't really need to see the other two films of this Uwe Boll masterpiece series of bad theater in order to understand it, although I will admit I was more partial to those films. This is very similar to the second feature of the seriesMy biggest criticism is the name "Hazen Kaine". In the first feature the hero is named "Farmer." In number two it was "Granger." So what was with Kaine? How about "Stockman"? Sure there is a homonym connection Kaine=Cane. A crop is not a farmer.Parental Guide: Plenty of F-bombs from Purcell...especially when he tries to mount a horse. No sex or nudity.
adonis98-743-186503 A modern day assassin, wanting out, is hired for one final job: to kidnap the kids of a local businessman. Things go haywire when it turns out he's chosen to return to the Middle Ages and bring back order to a kingdom in chaos. Uwe Boll once again directs a In the Name of the King film and once again the end result is pure garbage fire and it's a pretty bad waste of time but also talent since Dominic Purcell is actually a pretty good and decent actor but this movie never gives him what he truly wants and that's very disappointing but then again? Boll made it..
barbosa-vicki I just watched this and enjoyed it, but only because I like Dominic Purcell. I really liked him in John Doe and in Prison Break, and was hoping he'd been in some better movies. Sadly, this is all I could find.What I liked about ITNOTK 3: Dominic. His acting was low-key and emotionless, but I guess that's appropriate for a hit man. The landscape. The dragon which was pretty good, although I would have liked to see more of it. And to see the hero engage with it a little more than just firing at it.What I didn't like: the cheesy accents. The inspiring speech before the climactic battle was embarrassing. The plot: it made little sense.Nothing fit together: Why did the same actor play both villains, in the past and the present? Why did the hero have the tattoo? Why did the little girls have the amulet? Why was he chosen to lead them to victory when he actually did very little? And my biggest question: why did he decide to rescue the children when he had been the kidnapper? What made him change from a bad-ass hit man to a compassionate (I presume) rescuer? Was it something the princess said? ("That's not a job for a man.") Is that really enough to turn someone's life around?The best line in the movie: "We're all going to die."Was it worth watching? If you like Purcell, and dragons. If you want a coherent plot and superb acting, look elsewhere.
Tony Heck "You're on the path that you must follow to its end and that end might come sooner then you think." Hazen Kaine (Purcell) is an enforcer for the mob who wants out. After being given one last job he thinks he gets his wish. He is to kidnap the daughters of the royal family and hold them for ransom. When he takes a necklace from one of the kids something strange happens. He is teleported back in time to the dark ages and the only way back is to save the village from a dragon. So...yeah. That is actually what the movie is about. When they tried this plot in the Army Of Darkness it worked. This one did not. To be fair though I didn't like either of the other two so if you did you may like this one. I am not a Uwe Boll fan but after watching and really liking Assault On Wall Street I was hoping for better then this one. But when the main character in your series goes from Jason Statham to Dolph Lundgren to Dominic Purcell there is really only one way the series can go as well. Overall, I have seen worse but it's really time for this series to stop. I give this a C-.