Matcollis This Movie Can Only Be Described With One Word.

Iseerphia All that we are seeing on the screen is happening with real people, real action sequences in the background, forcing the eye to watch as if we were there.

Ogosmith Each character in this movie — down to the smallest one — is an individual rather than a type, prone to spontaneous changes of mood and sometimes amusing outbursts of pettiness or ill humor.

filippaberry84 I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

aferdman Yes, this movie is awful as it normal for D'Amato and its my favored across collection of some 2000 awful flicks. Its awful because I couldn't find decent copy, colors off etc. So what makes it my favored? Main chick! She is slut, cheesy, undress often and, in short, this is the way single men like any women. Reality in USA quite strange for any local as women became species not necessarily females. This movie is a dream, imagination and a story and D'Amato makes conflict after conflict to keep it running. It also realistically shows how we, men, chase anything with name female on it. Yes, sex part kinda not here--too bad. The flick not shy touch social aspect namely money which is name of the game in US.

jojamas WORST MOVIE EVER Truly deeply offensively boring, with the most outrageous and invasive background music, weak and tiresome hackneyed "plot". In a word risible. Bought it on VCR for 49cents, you get what you pay for i guess, and I got a pretty good deal. 49 cents for a videocassette I can record over and over again...The movie seems to be a vehicle for some astoundingly sallow sex scenes which give the movie an air of a very low budget and sexless porno.Very much a product of the late eighties, this really has to be one of the worst movies ever made, really this is what the truly crapulent should try to be.