He Who Dares: Downing Street Siege
He Who Dares: Downing Street Siege
| 02 December 2014 (USA)
He Who Dares: Downing Street Siege Trailers

The sequel to Paul Tanter's "He Who Dares" will continue to follow the Special Air Service (SAS) anti–hijacking counter–terrorism team. In the thriller, Christopher Lowe finds himself summoned to 10 Downing Street to be dishonorably discharged from the SAS for disobeying a direct order, despite the fact that he saved the Prime Minister’s only daughter.

Reviews
Smartorhypo Highly Overrated But Still Good
Platicsco Good story, Not enough for a whole film
Ketrivie It isn't all that great, actually. Really cheesy and very predicable of how certain scenes are gonna turn play out. However, I guess that's the charm of it all, because I would consider this one of my guilty pleasures.
Kirandeep Yoder The joyful confection is coated in a sparkly gloss, bright enough to gleam from the darkest, most cynical corners.
smpomeara So many inaccuracies, I only watched the first 15 minutes, Called Major with corporal stripes, the British Army,unlike the Americans do not salute without a cap or beret, and what a salute, unshaven, wooden acting everything in it was wrong I could go on but don't Wat to waste anymore of my time, The most ridiculous film I've seen in years, DON'T WATCH IT UNLESS YOU LIKE REALLY REALLY BAD FILMS.
A Knight As many other reviewers have said this film is atrocious, a total waste of time. The acting is so wooden you could make a park bench out of it. The fight scenes are so badly put together it is laughable, this is supposed to be a highly trained SAS Trooper, only training this one would have had is how to tie his shoe laces; and as for the TV news reporter! OMG! I have seen nativity plays with 5 years that could act better.If we were to discuss the inaccuracies of protocols and procedures throughout the film, COBRA for one instance, we would be here all day. Politically and militarily this film is just awful, it is full of clichés and tabloid bravado with regards to the Regiment and as for the political intervention in a court martial, it is almost laughable. It doesn't even make for a good old fashioned macho action movie.Apparently the budget was $3,000,000; I can only assume that this was on the catering!Do yourselves a favour, go and do something else, anything else, it will be so much better than watching this.
trevor-103 Quite possibly one of the worst, most inane, awful films I have ever sat through, wooden acting, awful special effects, obviously fake head- shot stickers were on special during the day it took to film this as opposed to the wardrobe budget which obviously ran out extremely quickly as most of the actors were forced to share the same ill-fitting jacket. appalling dialogue full of unnecessary playground swearing.Truly dreadful!
Truth Speaker More in the style to which we've become accustomed from Press On Features - a production company that sounds more like an attribute for a sanitary towel than a purveyor of cinematic works o' fart. Many people criticise this film and its equally dire predecessor for their inaccurate representations of the SAS, but I say why stop there? These films have an entire cast of inaccurate representations of human beings. The producers must be geniuses as they are constantly finding the cash (and, in parallel, hacking away at the integrity of British Independent film) to create a production line of the worst films the UK has ever shipped out.Seriously, the script sounds like it was written by a teenage boy as a last-minute homework assignment. If any script consultants are ever used by this "writer/director" I would be astounded.Every scene is packed with atrocious dialogue and it's patently obvious that the "writer/director" has stuffed words in the mouths of the characters in an attempt to justify how they are behaving rather than do a crumb of research. Unfortunately for him, nobody with even vague brain activity will buy how these characters behave.This is a film that wants you to believe that eight armed people in fancy dress police uniforms can jump over the back wall of 10 Downing Street, indiscriminately shoot people and hold the PM hostage without being challenged. The 1-dimensional villain is played by Simon Phillips - some guy who wants to be an actor and so produces films and puts himself in starring roles. His spectrum of characters vary from being a fat bloke with a beard to a bearded bloke who is fat.The abysmally unimaginative direction attempts, and sorely fails, to be saved by an editor who has just discovered the effects panel in Final Cut Pro. Either that or he fell asleep on the keyboard. Constantly.The action sequences are rubbish. The humour is poor. Quality is non-existent. Even the wardrobe for every actor looks one size too big.Oh, and one more thing - if you are trying to get us to believe that you're shooting outside 10 Downing Street, then at least get the right style of numerals on the door.