Death on Saturn's Moon
Death on Saturn's Moon
| 31 December 2000 (USA)
Death on Saturn's Moon Trailers

Set in the year 2057, the science fiction film Ascension stars Paul Nolan as an agent investigating a suicide on Titan, Saturn’s largest moon. When severe weather keeps him stranded on the moon longer than expected, he begins to see that a greater evil may be present at the space station.

Reviews
Cathardincu Surprisingly incoherent and boring
Lightdeossk Captivating movie !
Michelle Ridley The movie is wonderful and true, an act of love in all its contradictions and complexity
Zlatica One of the worst ways to make a cult movie is to set out to make a cult movie.
jrundin I really enjoyed this movie, which tells the story of an agent sent out to investigate the mysterious death of a scientist stationed on a moon of Saturn. Apparently, the scientist chose one day to walk out of his station with no protective gear and died. The film manages with music and cinematography and acting to create an atmosphere of deep paranoia and anxiety. It's really quite beautiful to watch. Some may find it slow and lumbering, but that adds to the overall emotional effect. I found myself hypnotized by the leisurely pace and slow exposition of the characters' mental states through pregnant dialog and careful cinematography.As for criticisms I have read about the sets, go see a crappy zillion dollar Hollywood movie if that's what you want. I thought the sets were perfect for the story--claustrophobic, industrial, and threatening.My only criticism is that a bit more of a plot or a final revelation would have increased the film's entertainment value. The dialog is well-written, but others have complained that the story goes nowhere. I can understand this criticism, but I feel the film's other virtues make up for it. It perhaps would have been better had the central revelations of the movie been presented in ways that resolved the tensions so well developed in the film. Two big questions propel the movie forward. The first is what happened to the dead scientist. The second is how the investigating agent came to be on this mission and in his disturbed frame of mind. Neither issue gets a completely clear resolution. Moreover, it might have been nice if the resolutions of both had a clear connection.I think the movie's creator may have stumbled over one of the most common obstacles in the making of fantasy or science-fiction quest movies of this sort. Ultimately, it is very hard to create a revelation that is worth all the build up but not trivial or ridiculous or incomprehensible. The end of Kubrick's 2001 is a case in point. More plot-contrived intrigue would've helped, too--clearer deceptions and recognitions of deceptions among the characters. I think that that would've alleviated some of the critical complaints that nothing happens in the movie. However, while such plotting may have made the movie easier to watch for people who crave more action, it also may have done damage to the creator's vision, too--who I think was trying to create a sense of brooding mystery with no clear answers.Perhaps the creator should have re-read "Oedipus the King" by Sophocles. Now there's a murder mystery for the ages, where, through complex twists and turns and revelations a resolution is reached that solves the murder and affects the investigator. I loved this film; I hope its creator does more; I just hope he is willing next time to pay a bit more attention to theories of plotting movies for interest.
Clantron It surprisingly does have a storyline. however, I think the script is like 2 pages big because barely anybody speaks in this movie. The problem is that this movie does give you the idea it might kick in any moment, but in the end all I waited for was the credits it appeared since it never kicked in. Hugely disappointed because the storyline on the back of the cover seemed interesting. The movie keeps you wondering what's gonna happen next, but every time nothing happens.This movie was probably the worst spend 5 euro of my life.I gave it a 2/10 because in general I don't believe in 1/10. I consider those hate-scores. People that don't bother...
Taveeta Despite an alluring title and the promise of scifi mysticism, not to mention a lot of hype, Ascension is nothing more than a college film gone horribly wrong. Sixty and some odd minutes of close-ups, reaction shots, bad fades, flashback sequences and confused, lethargic and all around uninteresting characters running around inside what looks like my grandma's basement trying to escape some mysterious storm that seems to have a life of its own.The movie was meant to be something spiritual and haunting. An look inside the concept of what human beings perceive as life and death, good and evil and the very nature of forgiveness, acceptance, god and the afterlife. Instead, it's a giant tease with no payoff.The Titan storm....never really explained. Is it god? Is Titan some metaphor for purgatory? Is the missing lead scientist some sort of supernatural entity now? Does the director know that he filmed the most un-sexy love scene in all cinematic history? The two remaining scientists on Titan never really do anything, serve no purpose and pretty much just serve as a distraction from the rest of this jumbled story. And by the time you get to the end, you don't really care. Other reviews will go on and on about how beautifully this film was shot and how they did it on a shoestring budget. News flash.....it doesn't cost much money to make a sluggish, self-indulgent borefest like this rubbish….aka...Ascension...aka....John Krawlzik, go back to your day job. Avoid at all costs.