TrueHello Fun premise, good actors, bad writing. This film seemed to have potential at the beginning but it quickly devolves into a trite action film. Ultimately it's very boring.

Murphy Howard I enjoyed watching this film and would recommend other to give it a try , (as I am) but this movie, although enjoyable to watch due to the better than average acting fails to add anything new to its storyline that is all too familiar to these types of movies.

Derry Herrera Not sure how, but this is easily one of the best movies all summer. Multiple levels of funny, never takes itself seriously, super colorful, and creative.

Payno I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

a-jakeholland I hate to be that guy, but the other reviewers just didn't seem to grasp what this show was trying to do. It is so much more than a genre "spoof" or "parody", rather - much like "Casa de Mi Padre" and "Spoils of Babylon" or "Garth Marenghi's Darkplace" and "Danger 5" - it is lampooning the process of how the films/shows of a certain era were made. The acting is supposed to be over the top or down right pathetic (The actors are playing fictional actors portraying fictional characters based on a fictional book by a fictional author - don't think too much about it). The dialogue and screen directions are supposed to be stilted and awkward. The strange camera angles and bizarre editing choices are as much a part of the "joke" as anything else. Glaring continuity errors are meant to service humor that may otherwise be lacking in the melodramatic dialogue/acting (again - this is the intent, not the consequence). On its surface it can be appreciated for the apparent use of satire, but unless you realize what is happening within the layers of the production itself, you're only getting half of the joke. As for Ferrell's portrayal of Eric Jonrosh, it's fairly obvious he is doing a send up to Orson Wells (the latter years) and not just rehashing old SNL characters as one reviewer put it. I wont say this show cannot be viewed or enjoyed by those unfamiliar with the production process - though some gags probably wont land as well for them - a foreknowledge of film conventions will certainly add to the experience (I watched with non film-nerds, and they loved it). At the very least if you've taken any sort of "intro to production" or "film studies" courses then you stand a better chance at "getting it." And if you haven't, there are still plenty of laughs to be had and seeing some of the actors play extremely against type is rewarding in and of itself. A must watch for filmmakers of all kinds and a highly recommended view for anyone else (assuming you have any sense of humor).

sgcim While this mini-series wasn't as funny as some of the best SCTV spoofs, it still had enough laughs in it to make it more watchable than most of what passes for comedy these days. To fully appreciate it, you should be somewhat knowledgeable about film-noir and jazz from the 1950s. There are references to 1950s jazz musicians like Wardell Gray, a tenor sax player who was mysteriously murdered in the desert outside of Las Vegas. They never found Gray's killer, so the writers borrowed that case for the plot of this TV show. There are a lot of other jazz in-jokes in the dialogue, so I can see where many people would find this mini-series baffling or boring. All of the performances in the show are fine, though some of the writing leaves the actors with some pretty lame lines in regard to humor. There are a few things that didn't make sense, such as showing the two detectives knock on Rock's door twice, J. Edgar Hoover's arms flailing around towards the end, and Will Ferrell's character just staring into the camera at the end, but they didn't have much of a negative effect on the show.

Mark Turner I've talked to far too many friends who have stopped watching Saturday Night Live over the past decade or so and every one of them has said the same thing: it's just not funny anymore. Oh don't get us wrong, there are the occasional moments when past glories seem at hand but 99% of what they offer just doesn't make us laugh. I would explain it away as our getting older but when talking with younger people those that watch say the same thing and their number is few.Which brings us to this movie, a compilation of six episodes of a "lost movie" that originally aired on IFC and has ties to FUNNY OR DIE, the online web humor site. I use the term loosely because like SNL the site isn't funny very often. One of the founders of the site is Will Ferrell, an SNL alum and one of the main people behind this series which explains a lot.The concept behind the series is a lost film by director and author Eric Jonrosh (Ferrell), a story set in the fifties jazz scene where a famed piano player named Rock Banyon (Michael Kenneth Williams) has been framed for the murder of chanteuse Fresno Foxglove (Maya Rudolph). Having passed out the night of the murder he has no alibi and the police bring him in for questioning. As their prime suspect he asks for two days to prove he's innocent which the police allow. From there he tracks down what few clues he has to find the culprit aided by another singer he was once in love with, Delores DeWinter (Kristen Wiig).Apparently this is a sequel to the earlier made SPOILS OF BABYLON, a parody series of the old epic mini-series that aired on TV in the eighties. That too featured Ferrell as Jonrosh doing the same thing. He presents a pompous character who thinks his every word is gold and who introduces and closes each episode. My biggest problem here was that this character sounded and acted like characters Ferrell has done before, offering nothing new and presenting little that was funny. That bothers me because honestly Ferrell can be one of the funniest actors around as well as a darn good straight actor (see STRANGER THAN FICTION). But as with many comedians from SNL and the stand-up scene of the time it's as if he's been surrounded by yes men who do nothing but tell him how great, how fantastic and how funny he is even when he isn't.Williams is wasted here. Having seen how good he can be in the IFC series HAP AND LEONARD I know what he can do and here he's not given much. Wiig is another SNL alum who has great potential and yet picks up roles like this one that offer nothing much. I'm guessing it was a favor to fellow SNL actors. Several more are included in the cast like Rudolph, Tim Meadows, Molly Shannon and Chris Parnell. Once more each deserves something better than this.I really would love to say I enjoyed this or that it offered a great parody of the genre but it felt forced to me rather than something that flowed with an admiration on the part of the writers, director and cast. Instead it felt more like it was trying for an AIRPLANE feel but falling far short. On the good side it never drops as far as the lame parody films like EPIC MOVIE, DISASTER MOVIE and THE STARVING GAMES.Ferrell continues to make movies that take on a roller-coaster feel going up and down when it comes to both popularity and the ability to make us laugh. Wiig has shown she's still doing great with roles in THE MARTIAN and BRIDESMAIDS. But isn't it time that ex-SNL cast members stop staying so close to one another to the point that they can't make a move without one another? And rather than listen to sycophantic crowds who surround them they need to find someone willing to say this doesn't work or this could be better rather than those who tell them how wonderful they are now.While not the worst thing I've watched in a while this movie is lacking. I tackled the first three episodes at one time and didn't get back to watch the last three until days later never feeling like I was missing anything in doing so. It would be nice if comedians would choose to make things funny for their audience rather than for their so called in group of friends. When the rest of the world just doesn't get it then the truth is it's not funny.