Hellen I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

Jeanskynebu the audience applauded

Greenes Please don't spend money on this.

Motompa Go in cold, and you're likely to emerge with your blood boiling. This has to be seen to be believed.

Horst in Translation (filmreviews@web.de) "Whistle" is a British short film from 2002, so this one has its 15th anniversary this year. It runs for slightly under half an hour and was the very first film and only short film written and directed by (then not yet) BAFTA-winning filmmaker Duncan Jones ("Moon", "Source Code", "Warcraft") and he was 30 at that point. I guess this is also the main reason why this one is relatively known today. But I must say that Jones did not impress me yet in here. The story about a hit-man performing a crucial job is basically fine, but the attention to detail was far from as good as it could have been. I also think that lead actor Dominic Mafham may not have been the best choice as there is nothing really evil or bad-ass about his performance. Winman gives a better performance, but nothing too memorable there either. The ending was really wide open and I was quite surprised when the closing credits rolled in, even to an extent where I wondered if Jones will continue the story in a full feature film at some point. I'd probably not be too interested in checking that one out as this short film did not get me curious to a level where I would care about a sequel. Not recommended.

MartinHafer I recently watched Duncan Jones' first full-length film, "Moon" and I was exceptionally impressed. The film was extremely inventive, unique and was amazing to look at considering it had a minuscule budget AND was set on the moon! So, when I noticed that "Whistle" was included as a bonus on the DVD, I was excited to watch it too.The film begins with a British family relocating to another country (it looks like Switzerland to me). The wife did not like the move and you wonder why the husband would do this. Then, you slowly start to realize--he's an assassin! Now you never are sure WHO he works for, but you can assume he's not just some mercenary--as he DOES have a conscience. And, that's the problem--because one of his killings goes terribly wrong...and he cannot live with himself. What's next? See the short film.The story is exciting, interesting and is very, very impressive considering Duncan Jones was inexperienced when he made this film. Taken along with "Moon", he is definitely a man to watch. And, incidentally, he's the son of David Bowie (whose real last name is Jones). Well worth seeing.

charlytully While MOON--the first feature effort by WHISTLE director Duncan Jones--is a decent sci-fi exercise, only D.J. "completists" will find this preposterously-premised short worth a half hour of their time. I found the Swiss scenery about the only worthwhile aspect of this family-man-by-day, techno-assassin-by-day yarn. When Groucho Marx famously proclaimed "I shot an elephant in my pajamas!" he was only JOKING. But Jones seems to be trying to stretch Groucho's thin comment into the basis for his spin on THE DAY OF THE JACKAL, as in, perhaps, THE NAP OF THE PEKINGESE. Seldom has so much effort been expended to accomplish so little. Perhaps such a waste of time would be excusable if it was coming as an ill-formed comedy skit from an SNL dim bulb. But viewers expect more in the thriller and\or sci-fi genres, and WHISTLE appears to have veered way off course while it was still in the concept stage. About the only positive lesson that can be derived from this misfire is that not every successful director will produce a humdinger his or her first time out of the chute. After all, Robert Redford may have won Oscar with his ORDINARY PEOPLE debut, but he wasn't exactly sun-dancing during the preceding decade or two.

Benoît A. Racine (benoit-3) The director is an up-and-coming next-generation whiz kid who has worked with Tony Scott and eventually directed the excellent sci-fi success "Moon" (2009), recognized everywhere in the world except the US. It is just too bad that he had to start his directing career with yet another killer-for-hire story. I mean: don't they already represent roughly 50% of film production worldwide? The fact the killing is done with exotic, high-tech means bordering on the latest bloody video games is not an innovation. I found it impossible to have any sympathy for the main character for the following reasons: (1) we don't know why he is killing the people he is killing; (2) we know that his wife is fully cognizant of her husband's profession and even encourages him to stick with it through bouts of depression and that she is pretty much in a killer premenstrual world of her own all through the 30-minute film; apparently, the cow has absolutely no moral qualms about her second-storey balcony being used as an intercontinental missile launch pad or the fact that her son is raised in a murderer's den but the weather in Switzerland simply gives her conniption fits(!); (3) the hero's five-year old son is an emotionally retarded - and singularly inexpressive - quasi-autistic child whose only sign of life and contact with the outside world is that he is terminally addicted to video games (like his father); (4) in the general context of killing-as-a-profession, the bucolic "normal" Swiss postcard environment depicted is positively stomach-churning; (5) there is no possible way the viewer can be made to interpret with any certainty the meaning of the ending: was the anti-hero really trying to talk to his last victim's widow, and, if so, for what purpose? To tell her "Oh, by the way, I'm the one who offed your husband. He was a really bad man but I didn't mean to also pulverize your little girl. I'll try to do a better job next time, O.K."? Or was he deliberately setting himself up for a hit job (a suicide)? In both cases, the victim's widow's life is put at risk and we are asked to believe that this killer has a "conscience", which is itself one the most revolting aspects of the hit-man genre in general in that it asks the viewer to empathize with the angst, mood swings, family dramas and ingrown toenails of the perpetrator while not giving a rat's patoot for his victims.Technical note: This is the point in the film where the "whistle" of the title should be heard but isn't due to an inexplicable oversight in the sound editing.But then the film's other trappings are so sophisticated in their own polished and narcissistic way that no viewer will dare mention that last reservation aloud and everybody will pretend that they fully get the film's meaning.In conclusion, "Whistle" is a shabby little shocker that assumes the worst about its viewer's moral values and intelligence level. If it is meant to be satirical or somehow "funny", this dimension totally escaped me, unless there is a parallel to be drawn between the hero's wife and the cows insistently mooing in the Alpine countryside.