Ella-May O'Brien Each character in this movie — down to the smallest one — is an individual rather than a type, prone to spontaneous changes of mood and sometimes amusing outbursts of pettiness or ill humor.

Mathilde the Guild Although I seem to have had higher expectations than I thought, the movie is super entertaining.

Hattie I didn’t really have many expectations going into the movie (good or bad), but I actually really enjoyed it. I really liked the characters and the banter between them.

Zandra The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.

Pamela Nash As an Australian, I fully acknowledge and support the content of this hard-to-watch documentary. This is not 'news' to anyone in Australia who watches our shameful history regarding indigenous peoples.John Pilger is a highly acclaimed award winning Australian journalist who throughout his lifetime has contributed to humanity by calling the truth - http://johnpilger.com/biography. One reviewer criticizes him for not having lived in Australia for decades. The truth is the truth, no matter where you live in our global village. I would like to correct some content in one of the reviews here, which is otherwise a very thoughtful and intelligent review. 'The first thing shown to you is a 70's era anchorman talking about the plan of sitting ministers to simply round up people for no reason, and move them away, then taint their drinking water to sterilize them in a "Humane" manner'. This man was not an anchorman. At that time, he was by far the richest 'self-made' man in Australia. His name is Lang Hancock, a Western Australian iron-ore mining magnate (1909-1992). His daughter, Gina Reinhart (1954-present), is heir to his fortune and is one of the four richest women in the world. As an Australian I am utterly ashamed and disgusted by Hancock's sickening view and he did not speak back then for all Australians, although many Australians still wish the 'aboriginal problem' would 'just go away'! Another reviewer suggests that Pilger's report is biased and one-sided. Of course, we do not need to 'fix what is not broken' so Pilger's film explores the underbelly of racism and genocide...... the 'positive' things can readily be found if one cares to look. Journalists such as Pilger shine the light in the darkest of places across the world - where most don't dare go. He is not frightened by power and people often, if indeed they even bother to access such documentaries, feel very uncomfortable and challenged about their own view of our world. This then, surely, is a vehicle for inspection and change.

sazebs . This is the first review I have ever written. Like with a lot of movies that move me, I go back to IMDb after its over, and think of writing a review. And then I think pff it's late, it'll take too long. I'm tired. etc.but when i fell upon a couple negative reviews after watching this film, thought i'd try and set the record straight.This is a very good documentary. not because of how it's filmed, or edited or whatever, it's simply about the subject. It's deep. It's moving. And once it's over, it sticks with you for a while. You know that effect, like your left in some aftermath of a shocking event.The negative reviews say its one-sided. A lot of documentary's are biased anyway, when you think about it, just trying their best to get their point across. And if this one is, it doesn't matter 'cos we clearly don't hear enough about the sufferings and struggles of the aboriginal community, and you can't deny them. Maybe the Australian "white man" was demonised, maybe things were slightly inflated to fit the purpose. Don't care. You need to hear this stuff. Everyone needs to hear this stuff. Take it with a pinch of salt if you want, but watch it.ps just read Jesse Boland's review (above). way better than mines and on point.

Jesse Boland A good documentary should derail your entire day, unless you had planned ahead to watch it, in which case you are one together human being. Enough fluff, this is a very good, and extraordinarily surprising story to see for a Canadian who already feels that human rights are not shared equally in this world. I was planning to sit around, and watch network crap until I just started watching this to see if I could watch it later, and I was immediately hooked. The first thing shown to you is a 70's era anchorman talking about the plan of sitting ministers to simply round up people for no reason, and move them away, then taint their drinking water to sterilize them in a "Humane" manner. Yes hooked I was, so I stayed to the end, and learned a lot that I thought I knew, but even I had thought that these things had stopped, and that things in "1st" world countries was getting better in how we were treating one another. Just shows how deluded we all are. I Enjoyed the no holds bared journalism from John Pilger, who has been trying to get people to pay attention to this issue for almost 30 years. Just because their ancestors roamed the land like the herds they followed does not mean they did not own it like all men(at least that is my take). If the act of observation changes the observed, then could not the aboriginal peoples say that by observing nature they shaped it?Jesse of www.jesse.ca

l_rawjalaurence The title UTOPIA is ironic, referring to a district of Australia set aside for the native Aboriginies that is anything but Utopian. John Pilger's documentary takes a long hard look at the ways in which the Aboriginies have been systematically abused by the white majority, who have not only taken their land, but subjected them to a series of indignities, whether physical, mental, or legislative. In many parts of the country they live in abject poverty, in communities redolent of nineteenth century England, with little prospect of improvement. Small children are often taken away from their families and made to assimilate into mainstream white culture. A succession of government policies have subjected them to heavy-handed police tactics, as well as being invaded by the Australian army. As with many of his films, Pilger's documentary is hard-hitting and opinionated, with the presenter-director asking the kind of questions of important politicians (e.g. former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd) that few of his contemporaries dare ask. In structural terms, however, the film becomes rather monotonous in terms of content - a bit of judicious pruning wouldn't have come amiss. But watchable nonetheless.